User talk:RadioactOlive

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(This message was sent to User talk:Odanr and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Reply for your message: ~2026-37944-9 (talk) 01:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Coimbatore/minister-of-civil-aviation-to-launch-interim-expansion-passenger-amenities-at-coimbatore-airport/article70652822.ece

Hey there .. could you please try to add this link of a webpage along with that previous edit of mine to republish that once again ...?

~2026-37944-9 (talk) 01:31, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

If you really want me to do it for you, I suppose I can, but there's no reason you can't do it yourself. See Help:Cite if you need instruction on how to add the link as a reference. radioactOlive_(she/it)(talk) 01:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. It appears that you reverted an edit I made on the page "International Cricket in 2026" due to the link "seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia". The links I had put follow are similar to other links on the same page and simply cite an official scorecard from ESPNCricinfo. ESPNCricinfo is one of the main sources for cricket references on Wikipedia, and is used many times on that page in particular (in the exact same manner) alongside most other cricket-related pages, especially for match scorecards. ExtremelyRandomHouse (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, apologies about that! I absolutely failed to parse "espncric" as an actually coherent string of characters, and assumed it was just a spam link. Sorry! I'll be more careful about that. radioactOlive_(she/it)(talk) 01:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey no problem! Everyone makes mistakes once in a while we are all (hopefully) human. ExtremelyRandomHouse (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User talk:Odanr and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hey RadioactOlive,

You're invited to the March 2026 meetup in Portland, Oregon! Join us either in person at the Northwest Library or online at 10:00 AM on Saturday, March 28.

Please RSVP at the link above, even if you might be interested, so we can know how many people to expect. Hope to see you there!

(To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:45, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Science for the People shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. ~2026-17853-49 (talk) 02:50, 22 March 2026 (UTC)