User talk:Ruzhiner

Hi Rafi Chazon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Ohel Yizkor. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminder and suggestions. I have read through the help pages like and the Tutorial. There were indeed a few issues with Ohel Yizkor article, but I've made improvements now based on the guidelines. I appreciate you taking the time to review it. Rafi Chazon (talk) 15:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rafi Chazon,

Thank you for creating Sonderkommando Revolt in Auschwitz.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Rafi, good work on your new article. It would benefit from additional sourcing, and should be added to appropriate Wikiprojects and categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from he.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 20:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Rafi Chazon (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on Sobibor uprising. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gorodishche Ghetto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gorodishche. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on Drahichyn Ghetto. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Could do with a bunch of images.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 09:38, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on History of the Jews in Zakynthos. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I removed a section that was effectively unsourced. Ibid reference forms and those types aren't used in Wikipedia. Full citations for every sentence is the standard. Please revert and reference correctly. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 09:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rafi Chazon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of the Jews in Meknes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rafi Chazon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "History of the Jews in Meknes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 18:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, this information you added appears to be a hoax. More detailed coverage is here. Long story short, there is no evidence he said that, and the official twitter account of his office has also called these reports false. Keep in mind that the person in question is living, so hoaxes about him are covered by WP:BLP. VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 00:03, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

@Vice regent I am truly sorry. I was convinced that the source I used was reliable, but it turns out I was mistaken. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will delete the paragraph shortly. Rafi Chazon (talk) 13:56, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Rafi Chazon, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2025 Yokneam attack, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Yokneam attack.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Actually your changes were reverted twice, one by another editor and one by me, Please self revert. You may not continue to add back reverted edits. Please see Wikipedia:Onus Responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1277927150

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=1282127826

please self revert your change.

Cinaroot (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

@Cinaroot

I replied to you on your page.Rafi Chazon (talk) 15:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is GeoColdWater. Thank you.

You're being notified because you commented at the WP:Requested move that precipitated the discussion.

Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 04:27, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanked you and then reverted you at Greta Thunberg. I blame mi iPad! I’ve reverted myself. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey, Rafi Chazon. We are having a discussion at the talk page regarding the background section. I tried to ping you given that you are the main editor of that section, but it seems that maybe it didn't work right, hence this brief notice. Hope to see you there. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Super Goku V! Already answered there! Rafi Chazon (talk) 02:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah, I see I am late in posting here. (Self-trout.) Sorry for the trouble. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Destruction of Israel in Iranian policy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destruction of Israel in Iranian policy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 08:35, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from he:בית הצלם to Beit HaTzalam. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

The same applies to Every Person Has a Name. I have completed the necessary attribution for you. Please review other pages that you have created and ensure that appropriate attribution is given for source texts when a translation has been made from another Wikipedia article. Richard Nevell (talk) 23:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, you're right. They're articles I translated at the beginning of my Wikipedia career. Today I am careful to provide appropriate attributions to the articles I translate. Rafi Chazon (talk) 10:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article June 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June 2025 Israeli strikes on Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Crampcomes (talk) 14:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

You edited text here that other editor added, please open a discussion about it to achieve a consensus. I added several academic well recognised references, if you want to change it, then it need to be discussed. AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@AyubuZimbale You have been adding content to the Background section that either lacks sources, misrepresents the cited sources, or cites materials published before the attacks. Please note that the comment directly below the Background heading clearly states that this section is intended to include only information described as background by sources published after the war began on June 13. Happy to discuss anything at any time, but it appears that your recent edits have violated all of the guidelines mentioned above. This is why your contributions have been reverted by multiple editors. Rafi Chazon (talk) 17:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

My opinion is that the text I added has relevant sources from academic journals or international institutions: Once source that I added is: https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/from-words-to-deeds/Hezbollah_Case-Study.pdf The other is https://academic.oup.com/book/32400/chapter-abstract/268692345?redirectedFrom=fulltext both a serious references to be consider.

All along the article there are sources previous to June 13, and in the context of background it is nonsense to introduce only sources after 13-Jun as probably they will be less objective, more emotional and more biased. There is also a danger that we replicate war propaganda of either side.

I understand that we should limit the background to something reasonable, but my edits have (1) Academic and therefore lasting relevance sources (2) I did not added any topic just clarified context and (3) I opened a topic before any edit in the Talk page about avoiding framed content in the background. I hope you can contribute. AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but the decision to include only sources published after June 13 wasn't mine I'm afraid. I originally added several high-quality sources from before that date, including from top academic publishers like Oxford and Princeton, but they were all removed by a consensus decision. Rafi Chazon (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Where is the consensus debate? Is it in the talk page? AyubuZimbale (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I am not able to find this discussion. AyubuZimbale (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I as I commented I was not able to find where it was agreed to only include sources after June-13 in the background section which obviously is a section where references before June-13 has a lot of sense. Also I note that others editors added references dated before 13-June and they has not been deleted. So I am afraid that the reason of deletion is not only about the date.

Also you mention that "This is why your contributions have been reverted by multiple editors" but some editions reverted have sources dated after 13-Jun not only before, and also it is not true that this was the reason as the short comments provided are not indicating that. Finally, not only my edits were reverted but also improvements of other editors. AyubuZimbale (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I saw that you are editing the article and I suggest removing the Npov, non-neutral edit: "Legal scholars saw the Israeli strikes as a violation of international law".

The reason for this is in the source itself, which claims a legal dispute. Therefore, presenting a specific legal side contradicts the principle of neutrality. I will note that a search of the Internet reveals two or three specific individuals with this opinion. I will note that the source talks about a publication on CNN as a fact. I will add that Israeli intelligence thought differently from the American one and accordingly there is a legal difference. I will note that from my memory such an assessment was not mentioned until after the bombing, the lengths were shorter. For example, this report in Hebrew, citing the New Times: https://mobile.mako.co.il/news-world/2025_q1/Article-0f2f019ebfdc491026.htm I will also mention this article that defines an attack on a nuclear reactor as an example of a justified preemptive attack: Shue, Henry and Rhodin, David (2007). Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford University Press. p. 215.

Thank you in advance for your help and contribution to the free encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.70.165.173 (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Rafi Chazon,

Are you aware that Timeline of the nuclear program of Iran already exists?

Therefore do we also need, History of the nuclear program of Iran?

Please also see WP:Copying within Wikipedia.

Regards, 220 of ^ßorg 12:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

https://www.b144.co.il/b144_sip/401D0D1A4370655D4F17021244/ 185.84.106.184 (talk) 13:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on Operation Red Wedding. Another editor, Alalch E., has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Operation Red Wedding, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Iran–Israel war#13 June. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. WP:LLM-generated WP:REDUNDANTFORK to the content in Iran–Israel war#13 June and List of attacks during the Iran–Israel war

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 13:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on Operation Narnia. Another editor, Alalch E., has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Operation Red Wedding, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected to Iran–Israel war#13 June. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. WP:LLM-generated WP:REDUNDANTFORK to the content in Iran–Israel war#13 June and List of attacks during the Iran–Israel war

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 13:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello Rafi Chazon,

Please study the guideline Wikipedia:Notability § Whether to create standalone pages.

You created dedicated articles for both the Operation Red Wedding and Operation Narnia, the two June 13 military actions that marked the start of the Operation Rising Lion, the June 13 operation, that encompasses these military actions and other military actions. You can notice how the articles you created redundantly repeat a lot of content between themselves as they mostly discuss the background: That is a good sign that these two topics are naturally a subtopic of a larger topic. They share the background with the entire Operation Rising Lion.

The entire Operation Rising Lion and its background are already discussed in Iran–Israel war (its "Background section" and Iran–Israel war § 13 June; the specific targets are covered in List of attacks during the Iran–Israel war).

The cited guideline provides an answer for what to do here: Sometimes, a notable topic can be covered better as part of a larger article, where there can be more complete context that would be lost on a separate page and several related topics, each of them similarly notable, can be collected into a single page, where the relationships between them can be better appreciated than if they were each a separate page.

Because all the other information such as the background and the targets had already been a part of the encyclopedia, essentially, the only new information that you added to the encyclopedia is that when, during June 13's Operation Rising Lion, Israel targeted IRGC commanders, that aspect of the operation was labelled Operation Red Wedding, and when it targeted the nuclear scientists, that aspect of the operation was labelled Operation Narnia... and that these names are taken from Game of Thrones and The Chronicles of Narnia, respectively. We do not need two new articles to say this—it only takes a 1-2 sentence addition to Iran–Israel war.

Sincerely, —Alalch E. 13:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

When translating from another language version of Wikipedia, as at History of the Jews in Arta and History of the Jews in Riga, you must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary: Content in this edit is translated from the existing Hebrew Wikipedia article at [[:he:קהילת יהודי ארטה]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template {{Translated|he|קהילת יהודי ארטה}} to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 20:40, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Francesca Albanese, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

@Est. 2021, you have violated 1RR. Please check your talk page soon! Rafi Chazon (talk) 21:41, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:2025 murders in Israel indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Portrayal of the October 7, 2023 attack in Palestinian Authority schools, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portrayal of the October 7, 2023 attack in Palestinian Authority schools until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

On 13 October 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Gaza peace plan, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 06:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

@Schwede66 Thank you for placing the article there. Just one note, there is a slight inaccuracy in what you wrote. It could be interpreted as if both Hamas and Israel are releasing hostages, while all news sources are reporting that Hamas is releasing Israeli hostages and Israel is releasing Palestinian prisoners. I would appreciate it if you could clarify this, perhaps something like "Exchange of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners". Thank you again. Rafi Chazon (talk) 07:42, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

I can see you've been working hard on this article but it has some Sfn/Harv errors. At the end of the edit summary for this content, you can see the automatic system Tag of Tags: harv or sfn errors. You added Sfn cites but they don't have complete citations like cite book or cite web or whatever for the Sfn format to work. Please take a look at Help:Shortened footnotes#How to create shortened footnotes for instructions. Refs 9, 10, 11, & 12 all have this same problem. If you can get this issue fixed, the article will no longer be in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. - Shearonink (talk) 01:40, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done. Rafi Chazon (talk) 06:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Rafi Chazon. Thank you for your work on Mazyr Ghetto. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:36, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Palestinian Authority Martyrs Fund, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2026 Iran conflict, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:13, 3 March 2026 (UTC)