User talk:Rainsage

Hi Rainsage! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 02:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poladpur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ST. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aravind Adiga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

FortunateSons (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Please be aware of the relevant restrictions above, particularly concerning the I/P conflict.

I like your edits, but am slightly confused why you removed this reference? FortunateSons (talk) 14:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

thanks for letting me know about the policy.

i changed the reference from a Tablet article generally about Hoffmann to the specific Tablet article that covers Frank saying she recognized Hoffman.

just realized the first link was there because that was the actual Tablet article she read where she recognized Hoffman. i don't think that was clear before.

perhaps it should be a note rather than the reference? For example, "This is the Tablet article where she recognized Hoffman." Rainsage (talk) 15:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Makes sense, it’s probably a good idea :)

I will think about the optimal way to include it. FortunateSons (talk) 12:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Ok sounds good. Rainsage (talk) 19:39, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mokhtar Mokhtefi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 10:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you! Rainsage (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Gaza Strip famine, you may be blocked from editing. If you add content and are reverted, you don't get to simply add it back and insist that it remain there during a talk discussion. The WP:ONUS is on the editor who seeks inclusion of disputed content. That's why it's called "bold-revert-discuss" not "bold-revert-revert-discuss". GordonGlottal (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok thanks for letting me know. I got confused between the two policies. Will remember for future. Rainsage (talk) 00:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Well I looked up "bold-revert-discuss" and it says it's optional and not mandated policy. As far as I know, 1RR is not optional. Sure, we can follow BRD, but it seems unfair to term me asking you to follow 1RR as "disruptive editing". Rainsage (talk) 00:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. Thank you for your recent contributions to Pierre Chaulet. I noticed that you added an image to the article's infobox as a thumbnail. In future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox, as this is against the Manual of Style. When adding an image, supply only the filename to the |image= parameter and the caption to the |caption= parameter instead. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using; please consult the Template page for the infobox being used on that page for proper instructions and documentation. Thanks! - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 00:39, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the note and for fixing it. Rainsage (talk) 04:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Lovers (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

thank you! Rainsage (talk) 17:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rainsage. I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 22:15, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Based on your work on the Simon Nkoli article, have you considered nominating it as a Wikipedia:Good article? Iostn (talk) 19:47, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

hello, thanks for noticing :) i am planning to do some more work on it first before trying for GA. Rainsage (talk) 02:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hamasnik editor who changes things to skew public opinion of terror organization. 184.96.163.66 (talk) 14:12, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the enforcement request I look forward to talking to you. You seem to have got the hang of Wikipedia after 2,000 edits so nicely done. Ecpiandy (talk) 02:55, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Could you find another home for the section you restored? It doesn't fit under the WOL brief summary, because it's primarily about Kiswani, not about her work with WOL per se. Maybe make a new section for controversies surrounding protests? Would love your thoughts about how to make the logic of the article flow a little better. DuckOfOrange (talk) 07:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Please respond to my message on the Kiswani talk page, so it's easier to keep track of this conversation. Thanks! Rainsage (talk) 07:45, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

EDIT: Sorry just saw you responded on the relevant talk page - let's discuss there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamnotanorange~enwiki (talk • contribs) 08:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

There's isn't a template for this, but this arbitration motion thread mentions you. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 08:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Rainsage. I receive notifications any time you comment on an article talk page I am actively involved in. There is no need to separately ping me each and every time on my own user talk page. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

great thanks for letting me know. Rainsage (talk) 16:13, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi again Rainsage. Please just answer the question I had related to WP:OWN, WP:COI, WP:UPE on the Israel Frey page. You have an extreme interest in the page so it is not out of the ordinary of problematic behavior and you have continued to deflect in not answering my query and now instead reacted by warning me in retaliation on my talk page.

In good faith, I had even said, "...though it is also possible you are not since it seems like you do just hold a heightened interest in many Israel-Palestine related subject matter articles in general given a review of your edit history. If you are not, then simply make that clear now."

All that would have been necessary there is a basic refutation and clarification and we then move on to continuing to discuss the content of the article. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

After I reverted your changes, I started a discussion on the Talk page to give you my reasons for my revert. Your initial response was to violate 1RR , accuse me of WP:OWN and WP:POV, and refrain from responding to my points. Once you and 2 other editors participated in the discussion, all of the issues I had raised in my initial post were resolved.

Since you have continued to cast aspersions, I made a post on your talk page asking you to either provide evidence for your accusations or stop . Now you are here, adding more aspersions to my Talk page. If you truly think that I am violating policies, you can report me. But I personally don't see how starting a Talk page discussion to solve our content dispute is WP:OWN or how my alleged "extreme interest" shows I have a WP:COI. Rainsage (talk) 18:01, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

I was just looking for a direct answer to my query related to UPE and COI. The behavior having created the page and then the OWN behavior after, especially for a BLP such as this, would normally get me to tag the page with potential for undisclosed paid editing potential. I was only asking that you deny and disavow such potential in clear terms. You have refused countless times now to just say, "No, I am not", unless I missed that. Which in that case, I apologize for the oversight and will just move on. Iljhgtn (talk) 16:17, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

It sounds like you don't understand what OWN behavior is. I've avoided edit warring and attempted to resolve our content disputes through discussion despite your personal attacks against me; that is the opposite of OWN behavior. If you had actual evidence for your COI/UPE accusations, I would be happy to respond, but you don't. Given that you have cast aspersions instead of meaningfully responding to my points in talk page discussion, it appears you make personal attacks in order to derail/avoid discussion. So I see no reason to entertain your aspersions. I agree that you should apologize and just move on. Rainsage (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

For the purposes if WP:PIA, Al Jazeera is considered a "biased source", and so we should find others to use on that subject area. Please self revert or find another source when editing in this area. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Whereas ToI is considered just "potentially biased" on PIA, "The Times of Israel is generally reliable, although potentially biased in certain topics like the Israeli–Palestinian conflict", AJ goes further it says, " Al Jazeera English and especially Al Jazeera Arabic are biased sources on the Arab–Israeli conflict". Given that, please either remove the content, add attribution, or self-revert to remove the source, and please restore the ToI source which you removed on the GHF article. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Both AJ and TOI are considered "biased" but "generally reliable". Reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Both sources can be and are used widely in PIA. If you want to change AJ's designation as "generally reliable", you would have to open a new discussion on RSN.

I replaced the liveblog version of the TOI article with the actual article. Why do you prefer the liveblog? Rainsage (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Did you? Maybe I looked at the history incorrectly. It looked like you were only removing the ToI and adding back Al Jazeera. "Potentially biased" and just plain is "biased" though are not exactly the same thing. Even without any further update to the RS/P. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes you did look at it incorrectly. Since you have a history of making false accusations against me, I would strongly recommend you be more careful in future, or you may face sanctions.

It doesn't matter; both are considered Generally Reliable. But if you truly think I am wrong, you should open a discussion on the Article Talk page or Reliable Sources Noticeboard. Rainsage (talk) 20:32, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

I was just asking, in what I felt was a friendly manner (hard to convey over text via the internet) a question based on behavior or the perception of it. You are free to not answer it if you felt that I was being disrespectful, but know, that I was not. I don't know why you are now claiming that I levied "false accusations" when all I did was ask you a question, albeit repeatedly since I felt you were dodging in replying. Also, you are now conflating issues, because that thread was above, and in this one I am just discussing these sources with you. Again, in the interest of WP:AGF, I apologize if you felt that I was accusing you of something. I felt I was asking. In my mind those are two different things. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:41, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Well I certainly disagree with your interpretation of your behavior, but thank you for apologizing. Rainsage (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

May I suggest you create an archive for your talk page? Maybe on a rolling annual basis like I do? It is really long and probably only going to get longer. Up to you, but I think it is at the point where it would be ready for it and would benefit from it. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rainsage. Thank you for your work on David Luis Gonzalez. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing! Rainsage (talk) 02:26, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gaza Soup Kitchen logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 07:01, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi, i uploaded this image to use on the Gaza Soup Kitchen page, but I see that you replaced it with a different logo. Just wondering if there's a reason you like the other logo better? Rainsage (talk) 07:06, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hamas external European operations, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamas external European operations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi you reverted my edit, which is fine - but can you take a look at the change I was suggesting please?

Alon Ohel: Deletion nomination - the inclusion purports to be "sexual violence" but the testimony clearly states that the action performed was washing the hostage "thoroughly so he would not develop skin rashes". Including it as "sexual violence" is a stretch, as even the quoted hostage finishes the story with "Luckily, it didn't go any further" Sellotapemaskingtape (talk) 08:32, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, you are not ECR yet, so you cannot make edits regarding the Israel/Palestine conflict anywhere on Wikipedia, except as formal edit requests on Talk pages. That means you weren’t supposed to make this post on my Talk page either.

I already explained my reasoning at the Talk page. If you still disagree you would have to wait until you are ECR to participate in the discussion. Rainsage (talk) 16:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Orit Strook, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tableland, Trinidad and Tobago, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)