User talk:RavenFireblade

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Draft:Jack_Logan.

AfC notification: Draft:Jack Logan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jack Logan. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, i added few new sources and followed the editor’s advice. This i think has improved my article. Can you please give it a chance and reasses? Thank you! RavenFireblade (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Logan (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft still lacks sufficient reliable sources to establish notability. Page creator has COI so draft needs to meet the higher bar of very clearly establishing notability as defined. Subject feels WP:TOOSOON. As previously requested, on the Talk page, please provide WP:THREE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Logan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, RavenFireblade! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Logan (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still fails to address notability issues. Please provide WP:THREE on Talk page as requested. Please change content to past tense to meet WP:MOS. The new Manilla Bulletin link does not work (and if it can be repaired, it is included twice which should be consolidated).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Logan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 00:33, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Logan (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See my further detailed comments on the Talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Logan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 02:36, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Logan (filmmaker) has been accepted

Jack Logan (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MWFwiki (talk) 01:21, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @MWFwiki! I really appreciate your assistance. RavenFireblade (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello RavenFireblade! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Draft:Jack Logan, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

September 2025

Your edit to Jack Logan (filmmaker) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much @Dclemens1971 for letting me know. I understand the concern regarding copyright and I want to assure you that I take Wikipedia’s copyright policy seriously. Any text that may have been too closely paraphrased from sources such as Manila Standard or Daily Tribune has since been removed and rewritten in my own words with proper citations.

I will be more careful moving forward to summarize information in neutral language rather than copying source text. If you notice any other sections that still seem too close to source wording, please let me know so I can rephrase or remove them.

I also plan to request revision deletion (per WP:REVDEL, criterion RD1) for the past revisions that contained copyright violations, so that the page history is fully clean.

Thanks again for the guidance. RavenFireblade (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use AI to respond to other editors. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:30, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Jack Logan (filmmaker)

I've undone a lot of your edits because they were not neutral or violated our policy on biographies of living people. Per WP:COIEDIT "you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles directly". Going forward, I highly recommend that you use {{edit COI}} on the article's talk page to request edits. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles