User talk:Rcarter555
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly changing content—in a back-and-forth fashion—back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this stage is to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand, not to engage in edit-warring. Wikipedia provides a page that details how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Polygnotus (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- I find it so ironic that you accuse others of the things of which you are guilty. Rcarter555 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are not making sense. Polygnotus (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Onus
The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. I see you have been editwarring multiple times before so you probably know that already. Polygnotus (talk) 14:22, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- You are removing a longstanding item on the page. The onus is on you to get consensus. Rcarter555 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- Nonsense, that is not what WP:ONUS says, which is part of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy. If you disagree with the policy you should try to get it changed, not just deny that it exists. Polygnotus (talk) 15:42, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Talkback

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Polygnotus (talk) 04:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)