User talk:Rht bd

Hi AlbeitPK! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:23, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Selkoe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Selkoe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz (talk) 19:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Biharilal Chakraborty, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DJRSD (talk) 14:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amendments to the Constitution of Bangladesh into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 05:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Petroleum & Mining Engineering has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 14 § Petroleum & Mining Engineering until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 15:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rht bd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Rht bd (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Moheen". The reason given for Moheen's block is: "Copyright infringement: Rahmat Ali (actor)".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Yamla‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: The block seems to have already timed out. You should be able to edit now. If you can't, let me know. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

AlbeitPK (talk) 06:35, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Do you happen to have any sort of relationship or close connection with Moheen? — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 07:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Nope. AlbeitPK (talk) 09:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Are you Meghmollar2017 or User:Moheen ? 59.152.7.99 (talk) 13:24, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Nope. Why do you suspect? - AlbeitPK (talk) 07:36, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

I browsed both of your edit history, it matches more with Meghmollar 2017. 202.134.13.131 (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Criminal backgrounds of Awami fugitives are being fabricated by bots and anonymous users. Please keep an eye on these individuals.

Hasan Mahmud (Politician) Mohibul Hasan Chowdhury Nowfel Zunaid Ahmed Palak Matia Chowdhury Obaidul Quader Shamsul Hoque Tuku

Thank you! :) Intlctzn (talk) 06:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bangladesh Chhatra League. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Goku from bd (talk) 11:37, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Bangladesh Chhatra League, you may be blocked from editing. Goku from bd (talk) 10:23, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Goku from bd (talk) 14:21, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedian Government of Bangladesh employee indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Somewhere, I don't remember where, there's a guideline or essay about not flooding AfD with nominations. I think it's particularly about not nominating many of one editor's articles at the same time, but the principle also applies to not overwhelming any deletion sorting category. WikiProject Bangladesh has relatively few members. Other editors help, but are often constrained by unfamiliarity with Bengali and/or Bangladesh's reliable source landscape. A limited number of volunteers participate in these discussions, and it's courteous to spread out nominations so that everyone has time to do their own research and give each topic due consideration.

Under the circumstances, 25 nominations is just over a week is excessive, to the point of becoming disruptive. Also, long strings of nominations with only a few minutes between them make it hard to believe you had time to do a proper WP:BEFORE on each topic. The results of the first four closed discussions in your spree are not encouraging either, with your !vote matching consensus only 50% of the time.

There are certainly articles that need deleting, but the task can be accomplished without nominating more than a couple per day. There is no deadline. For the sake of your colleagues and the encyclopedia, please slow down. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:42, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Will keep in mind. If you can find the Wikipedia rule on the aforesaid circumstance, please share with me. Rht bd (talk) 02:14, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

I came to post the same thing. This will/has completely overwhelmed the AFD process at Wiki Project Bangladesh. It does not help that the user copy pasted the deletion rational for multiple articles. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:36, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello there, and thank you for your help with NPP! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recent A7 speedy deletion nomination of 519 Enterprise, which occurred 9 minutes after the article was created. It's best practice not to nominate an article for A7 speedy deletion while it's actively being edited (except in the case of obvious articles, e.g., writing about my clearly non-notable cat). In practice, this means articles shouldn't be draftified if they have been meaningfully edited in the past hour.

I understand and sympathize with wanting unsourced stubs out of main space, but we also need to recognize that it can come across as bitey to nominate an article for deletion too quickly -- especially considering that articles in mainspace do not need to be complete, and editors are allowed to develop articles in the mainspace .

I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:44, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Rht bd (talk) 14:45, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi Rht bd. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2025-10-10. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Giraffer (talk) 14:56, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nurul Majid Mahmud Humayun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Corruption Commission. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that I've declined your G11 speedy deletion nomination of Shafi Ahmed because I did not find the article to be overtly, unambiguously promotional. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "rollbacker" (Rollbackers) will expire on 00:00, 10 October 2025 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Bongan^® →TalkToMe← 06:57, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Comptroller and Auditor Generals of Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_November_2#Category:Comptrollers_in_Bangladesh

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 12 November 2025 (UTC)