User talk:Riktetta

When adding a source ensure the article title, date, and publisher is included. F8RIL (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

arbitrarly removing contents is considered vandalism, you are free to modify and improve contents if you think are incompletes. Be more precise about what you think is missing.

See the edit I made since, adding the title, “Padova, dalla Juventus arriva anche Vogliacco”, as well as the publisher, and date. A bare url will see the article get tagged. F8RIL (talk) 18:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Please help me in doing such things, bare url are multiple in that section...

I believe you added those bare links. Go through each one, add title, and publisher. Example, ^[1] F8RIL (talk) 18:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, the following player has played for Italy Under-20, and there are proofs of it. This is a proof. --Valentinenba97 10:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juventus F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mattias Andersson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Dear Riktetta, thank you for your edits at many airport articles. Currently, Wikipedia has been vandalized by many unregistered users. If you detect any vandalism act, you can report here: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Cheers! Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 14:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Nguyen, thanks for the tip. Actually I am involved in an edit war between me, user MadMax3249 and unregistered user 213.122.231.207 which edits in Milan Malpensa page (arbitral removal of content) may represent vandalisms. In addition, I think that both profiles are the same person that sometimes do not (forgot to?) access. Any idea on how to handle? In the past I suggetsed to make this page available for modifications only to registered users, but I received no feedbacks...TY Riktetta (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

OK, I understand, I just took a look in the page history and think you should calm down because MadMax3249 is new user, not like you so he can make mistakes when editing. If he still removing the end dates without reference, I will talk to him. Don’t worry! Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 17:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. For your info, today it happened again, with the unregistered profile...:-S

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page André Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

The Lega B website is a pain the ass, but if you click on "trasferimenti estivi", it shows all transfers sorted by date and type (instead of by team). In Castenetto's case (which by the way they also mispelled as Castanetto), you can see it says temporaneo. Luxic (talk) 18:21, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Luxic: Hi Luxic, OK, now I see, thanks a lot. Please check page 2019–20 A.C. Milan season, section "Loans out" to see the latest loans that can be added to A.C._Milan#Out_on_loan section. Riktetta (talk) 08:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gran Canaria Airport. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You need to support your changes with sources that directly support them. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Milan Malpensa Airport. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jetstreamer: Hi. Maybe I lost something, but let's try to sum up:

• Tenerife South Airport: you claim that there is not such date on the reference: reference is Ryanair offical website (that, I think, is the best source for Ryanair services). If you look for Tenerife--> Beauvais flights, the last service available is on 5 January (the date that was included). Given that, which is the problem? Why you undid this revision? Please also consider that in Beauvais–Tillé Airport page the same info with same ref is provided (and was done by another user)

• Gran Canaria Airport: all the info provided were referenced (and always by Ryanair official website). NO unreferenced info were given.

• Milan Malpensa Airport: again, reference used is Ryanair official website, only that was a litlle bit deeper research.

Please reply, thank you Riktetta (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You need to provide sources that directly support the changes. The use of booking engines is original research.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Jetstreamer: Ok, this justify for Milan malpensa change, what about my points regarding Tenerife e Gran Canaria? Riktetta (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Much the same thing. Where in the reference you used, https://www.ryanair.com, is the date in question directly mentioned?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Jetstreamer: This is a quiet short-sighted policy: companies rarely announce the stop of a service (as they do with new opening) but it is enough to do a couple of clicks on their websites to find out. But this is considered an original research. On the otherside, third parties web sites (e.g. routesonline.com) not always announce the stop of a service in time. We truly run the risk to deny information because of bureaucracy. Riktetta (talk) 07:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

(Un)fortunately, WP:VERIFY is a policy, and if you do not provide a reliable source in compliance with it then the changes should not be implemented. By recalling it, me or anyone else can promptly revert such edits.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of Argentine footballers in Serie B, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 14:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

@Buidhe: Hi. Page belong to "Category:Lists of expatriate association football players" and it has been created in order to lighten his mother page, as already done for other similar pages. As you can see, the page is aligned to other in the category as per number and type of references. In order to meet verifiability policy I just added re-direction to Lega Serie B website, the official website collecting news, statistics and lists regarding Serie B championship. Other references may not be accepted as they are user based databases (e.g. www.transfermarkt.com). I then submitted page for review, please make sure that will be visible again. Wherever needed feel free to place the "unreferenced" tag. From my side I will have the commitment to add new references if and when available. Thank you Riktetta (talk) 17:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Riktetta, thanks for your contributions. It looks like you've submitted it to Articles for creation already so a volunteer will be along to review it soon. buidhe 02:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I wrote by mistake that Ricci is not injured, I wanted to say that he has not been replaced. For that reason, as he is part of a list of 23 players called for a "tournament" (the group stage of the Euro U21) - and not a normal match - he should stay on the list even if is not available to play.--88.88.123.218 (talk) 08:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

@88.88.123.218: Hi. ok, I see your point, but consider that several articles expressely stated that the player had returned to his team, lefting the U21 National team (e.g. this https://www.alfredopedulla.com/italia-under-21-ricci-infortunato-non-verra-rimpiazzato/). Actually it's not included in the list, nor aggregated to the roster. For this reason I think it should be listed in the "recent calls up section" as I did.Riktetta (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Portugal international footballers born outside Portugal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national football team.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inter Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filip Stanković.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivory Coast national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim Sangaré.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you add the main source provided on official FIGC website which includes new entries and players who had to leave due to injuries?--Island92 (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

If this source has not been added yet, we had better wait.--Island92 (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

@Island92: Hi, I added a new ref fo the new called ups. if we wait for FIGC ref we run the risk to be outdated. Anyway FIGC is not the only reliable source. Riktetta (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Tuttomercato web is not a reliable source. We should wait for that on FIGC official website.--Island92 (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

This is a your opinion and nothing more. Please stop arbitrarly removal or un-edit Riktetta (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

No. Tuttomercato web doesn't work directly with FIGC. The best source should come from here. I don't see it yet.--Island92 (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, just added a ref from Gazzetta.it (reliable as well) hope this is enough for your spoils. When FIGC ref will be available, feel free to substitute, in the meanwhile please stop undoing proper edits. regards. Riktetta (talk) 15:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

My intention was not to make you think about which edits are absolutely either right or wrong to be made, despite the fact they may be proper or not from time to time. Generally speaking, Gazzetta.it is much closer to the Nazionale than Tuttomercatoweb. Therefore the information currently given with that source works nicely. In addition to that, into the table list we should leave just Emerson for a merely reason: in this template the only thing written is just Emerson rather than the full name.--Island92 (talk) 16:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Added.--Island92 (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I see your point, but maybe, instead of undoing edits, you can ask for better ref. Undoing proper edits do not just create useless conflicts but it is also considered a vandalism. Please be more constructive next time; I'm always open to dialogue, never to war. With regards to the "Emerson issue", I think that you are discussing it with another user, not me. I have no point for this specific discussion Regards. Riktetta (talk) 08:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Remember just the fact when you add a new ref, it should be completed with the right parameters. Adding <ref> url link </ref> sounds like the edit was not taken care of very much.--Island92 (talk) 13:19, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

When you update Juventus trasfers, I'd prefer you update the footballers' pages and 2022-23 Juventus F.C. season as well. Dr Salvus 17:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Riktetta

It's great that you are expanding so many articles and adding references ... but please please can you fill the references using {{cite web}}? The WP:Bare URLs which you add (e.g , ) are obscure to readers and prone to WP:Linkrot.

You shouldn't be leaving problems like this for other editors to clean up after you. For help on how to fill a citation, see WP:HOWTOCITE, and {{cite web}}. Since most of your refs are to a few sites (e.g. TUTTOmercatoWEB.com), it i very easy to create a partly-filled template to which you need add only a few details. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I agree with BrownHairedGirl, having filled in a few citations myself on Atalanta B.C., including one more just now . Your diligence in keeping numerous pages up-to-date during the transfer market is appreciated, though it only takes a few seconds longer to provide complete citations (you can even copy, paste, change parameters), and it would save other editors the cleanup work. ^Complex/_Rational 20:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello again @Riktetta

4 weeks later, you are still adding bare URL refs, as in this edit.

Please please can you take the wee bit of extra time to fill out a {{cite web}} template?

Thanks. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi

I am continuosly adding filled references, however, it can happen that sometime I miss. I'm only human after all. Please also consider the complete edits I'm making, not just those with bare ref.s

Regards Riktetta (talk) 12:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.C. Sampdoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gonzalo Villar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Can you at least remember to update Template:Juventus F.C. Under-23 squad as you have not done with Michele Besaggio? Dr Salvus 10:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juventus F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alessandro Minelli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Why the mass removal of sources in this edit. The Banner talk 12:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Note: When an connection starts, you can remove the start date, not the source. The Banner talk 14:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Good morning, it is common use, in Airport pages, to limit the number of sources, in order not to heavy up the page. Usually ref.s for routes established and consolidated are removed for this reason. In case of Lyon–Saint-Exupéry Airport it has to be considered the possibiltiy to add, at the begin of the table, a reference linking to airport schedule: in this case the link would encompass all the existing routes in just one reference, making the section smoother. Anyway, this is, again, just a common use, if you think that would not apply to this specific page, feel free to undone (just update starting dates). Regards
Riktetta (talk) 14:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

It is common sense to leave the (preferably independent) sources in to improve verifiability, per WP:VER. The Banner talk 15:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for your message. Honestly, I don't know what is right.

Except Europeaon Countries, Many football Associations operate U23 team officially. So This cannot be argued.

But Most Europeaon Countries, U21 team to qualify at olympics and the team which participate in Olympic have 22 or 23 years old players.

In addtion, Many Europeaon football Associations don't operate U23 team officially

For Example, FIGC operate national teams as belows

• Please Check out FIGC Website
• National Team
• Under 21
• Under 20
• Under 19
• Under 18
• Under 17
• Under 16
• Under 15
• University

This situation cause argument.

In my opinion, Even though Wikipedia Italy national under-23 football team page is about Italy U23 team in 1970s.

Italy national under-21 football team and Italy national under-23 football team are same team.

Because they share same coaching staff.

I'm not sure what I'd call Itally Olympic team, U21 team or Italy U23 team.

For consistency, I hope that European countries operate U23 team officially like non-European countries.

Before discussion on talk page. You look Italian, I'd like to hear your opinion about this case. Footwiks (talk) 10:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Good evening,

Sources are the key to every airline and destinations table. Thus I can not understand why you A) keep removing sources and B) remove them when services start and not only the begins/resumes DD MM YYYY tag.

Of course I won't revert the edits but the sources given are crucial for the reliability of the air services we list at the airport pages, even after flights have begun.

Would be cool If you could just tell your point of view because I don't see any benefit from removing sources.

Brgds,
Der HON (talk) 23:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi, @Der HON:.

If a ref is removed is, usually, because: 1) it is repeated (e.g. there is already a cumulate reference at the beginning of the table, collecting all the services). This is mainly to prevent the so-called "reference overload", 2) The webpage is no longer available/accesible (or contain virus...yes, it also happened, I think in the Antalya Airport resulting in just a tile pointing to nothing. 3) The reference come from a non-reliable source (e.g. Italiavola.com, that is a quite weel updated website, but being a user-based forum did not meet the reliability requirements).

When updating an airport page, I try to check deeply almost all the reference referring to already exixting/already begun/already/resumed routes, but it can happen that I miss someone. Of Course it can also happen that I wrongly delete some legit references (in this case, wait nothing to restore them). I'm trying my best in order to "maintain" these kind of pages, in which several references have been left since I do not know when. If you think that also these must be left, I will no longer check them.

Best regards Riktetta (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Good evening,

Sorry but I just saw by now that you had answered my questions, but somehow Wikipedia didn't show me the ping. Nevertheless, thanks for your answer.

In general, I would call myself d'accord with your statements, especially with point 2. Regarding nr. 3 it is indeed bad to have non-reliable sources in the tables but in the end it's better than to have no source.

The only sources that I do remove when a service starts/resumes/ends are landing page links, e.g. "https://www.lufthansa.com/de/de/homepage" as they do not fulfill Wikipedia standards at all.

If a reference is added multiple times because it supports several new service I can kind of understand it to remove it. Still, I wouldn't delete it completely but just move the reference next to the airline name

My main goal was to write you because I lately saw some changes e.g. at Bologna and Palermo airport pages where you removed the sources for an airline with only one destination or accidentaly removed a source which was still used somewhere else and therefore got "orphaned".

But as all things are clear now - no more topics or points to discuss about.

Thanks a lot and brgds,
Der HON (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023–24 A.C. Milan season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–24 A.C. Milan season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:44, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi

thanks for invitation to discuss, just submitted a reply. Regards. Riktetta (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023–24 Serie A, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023–24 Serie A until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Ciao, allora pensavo di fare così: per i parametri zero (Skriniar) e i ritiri (Ibra) possiamo già aggiornare, per i retrocessi invece direi di aspettare Domenica prossima per via del dubbio riguardante Verona o Spezia (e il giorno stesso dovrebbe esserci il ritorno dei play-off).

--Valentinenba97 (talk) 16:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

ok. Attendo settimana prossima anche i fine prestiti, allora...
Riktetta (talk) 19:12, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Al contempo segnalo che per quanto riguarda Bari e Cagliari per i ritorni vanno monitorati:

• Benali (LBY) e Botta (ARG) nel Bari;
• Rog (HRV), Kourfalidis (GRC) Radunović (SRB), Obert (SVK), Lapadula (PER) e Nández (URY) nel Cagliari

--Valentinenba97 (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Ciao

scusa, ho visto solo ora che mi hai risposto. Nel Bari gioca anche Ceter (Colombia), mentre Botta sembrerebbe andare a scadenza al 30 giugno...Nel Cagliari rientrerà dal prestito anche Gaston Pereiro (URY). Faccio sempre confusione, questi di rientro vanno subito "grassettati" o si aspetta che scendano effettivamente in campo?

saluti
Riktetta (talk) 16:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

I rientri dal prestito sì (finché non vengono ceduti), quelli in attesa di rinnovo no. --Valentinenba97 (talk) 12:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genoa CFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reggiana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi... I'm very grateful that you update wiki pages when routes start and end - i.e. you remove the "(begins XXX date)" or "(ends XXX date)". However, I notice that when you do so, you also remove the reference or source relating to the route. A number of pages on wikipedia have been challenged and then deleted by other wiki users because the page does not contain sources for all the routes. If you look at pages for airports in the USA, you will see that references and sources are retained forever. Some people in the USA think that European airports should have the same rules on wikipedia as for American airports - their argument is that if references do not exist, then it is not an encyclopaedia. Would you be kind enough to *keep and not delete* the references and sources on pages, so there is a reduced risk of pages being deleted in the future ? It seems a shame that you are putting in all the effort... only for pages to potentially be deleted in the future. Many thanks in advance. Pmbma (talk) 15:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for contributing in WP airport pages.
The removal of reference is not intended, of course, to impoverish the page but rather than to prevent several other chellenges that may arisen: 1) to prevent the overload of references that would make heavier the page and the reading (preventing the so called "reference orgy") 2) much references are not maintained, resulting in links to no longer existing or archived pages (that can't be considered valid references anymore) and 3) much references, if we consider those used in airports, points to non-reliable sources (user based sites) that also are not liked by wikipedian community (and guidelines). Actually much airport pages already has a reference, at the begins of the destination table, pointing at the overall flight plan. These represent a comfortable cumulated reference already embedding all the routes mentiuoned. In normal conditions these would be considerated enough. Actually claiming that a routes does not exists because there is not a reference on WP is quite...weird (but, hey, just my opinion), and would be even weirder to challenge an entire page because of this, while there is no rule stating that every single route listed has to have a reference. For sure, I will try not to remove references that may help the page (especially those in small/minor airports) but I will continue to remove references that are not acceptable, not relevant and/or repetitive. Hope to have explained my POV... Riktetta (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cape Verde national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Angola national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cameroon national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for informing. All league season articles use templates for the standings, therefore we should have a procedure to transition towards that, and in fact I am quite surprised this had not been done before. The fact club season articles are (wrongly) pointing to the main article rather than the template is not an excuse, and we should instead change them all to use a "{{2023–24 Serie A table|showteam=MIL}}", etc, syntax instead. I will shortly start doing these changes myself, in order to make room for the transition to happen seamlessly. Thanks, Angelo (talk) 16:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Guadeloupe national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Guinea-Bissau national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page DR Congo national football team, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:27, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Cape Verde national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Pina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inter Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pro Patria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, you should know that adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to linkrot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources. A bare URL is a URL cited as a reference for some information in an article without any accompanying information about the linked page. In other words, it is just URL copied and pasted into the Wiki text, inserted between <ref>...</ref> tags, without title, author, date, or any of the usual information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already entered one or more bare urls to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles, and to avoid future link rot, please consider supplementing your bare URLs—creating full, inline citations with title, author, date, publisher, etc. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Inline citations. Thank you. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italy national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stade Jules-Ladoumègue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2023–24 Serie B. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi
Sorry, my bad! that was meant as a "sandbox trial" but I then forgot to remove.
Riktetta (talk) 07:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I saw that you created this page, and from the start, the home kit is the only one you carried over from this season. I was just curious if you knew that was going to be the same home kit, or if you just left it in there and it might still change. Do you know? Thanks, 2pou (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi
I must probably forgot to reset (ot put in comment) such info. As per today I have no info on how the shirt will be. Feel free to put in comment these info. Regards Riktetta (talk) 14:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martinique national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FC Red Star.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italy national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

No initiative was taken. Order players were added per source. I know I had to put them by caps. I had simply no time to do it. Regards. Island92 (talk) 07:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi... I'm a little puzzled as to why there are some route end dates for Easyjet at Milan Malpensa - e.g. to Oslo or Copenhagen. As far as I can tell, Easyjet haven't finished publishing schedules beyond mid December 2025 - so trying to infer route end dates just beacuse a route is not on sale beyond mid December may not be reliable. Do we have any kind of source to show that these routes are definitely ending ? Pmbma (talk) 18:28, 7 April 2025 (UTC) t

Hi

actually Easyjet seems to have fulfilled capacity for the whole Northern winter 2025/2026, as all the other routes are available up to 30 March 2026 (see, as some mere examples, these ref: <ref>https://www.missionline.it/easyjet-la-stagione-invernale-e-gia-in-vendita/^[1], <ref>https://siviaggia.it/notizie/easyjet-nuove-rotte-inverno-2025-2026/518515/^[2] and also reference from Easyjet website itself <ref>https://www.easyjet.com/it/ispirami#inspire=1&origin=MXP&date=Italy_One-way_Winter-2025^[3].

Which is the logic for re-opening some routes (that were actually supposed to be transferred totally to Milan Linate) in October 2025 and make them lasting only up to December, is not known to me. It could also be that they will adjust availability, for these, in near future. In that case, I will have no problems in update the page, but, for now, it cannot be avoided to indicate that there is a planned end date.

I'm still looking for the reference to add for these but, apart Easyjet website (that seems to be unacceptable) I found nothing. Most articles on-line only, inaccurately and roughly, report the transfers of these routes to Milan Linate without

- Indicating the seasonal re-open in Malpensa

- Not considering that, when re-open in Malpensa, some of these routes are no longer available in Linate (e.g. NO Linate - Birmingham available after October 2025)

Consider also that Easyjet recently closed definitively some routes from Malpensa (e.g. Pristina, Split) but no info were delivered about these closures, not from Easyjet website, nor from independent articles.

The only thing I can do is to take the commitment to constantly keep an eye on if and how these routes will change, and updated Malpensa Airport page accordingly.

Any other constructive suggestion is, of course, welcome.

Available for any further info, regards.

Riktetta (talk) 09:21, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2025–26 Como 1907 season. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Honestly I do not see reasons to draft it directly. Have you opened a discussion to get consensus about this action?

Anyway, the period is right to start to think about next season, as similar pages already have been created and next season page is established as well. From my side I can just take the commitment to constantly update the page in order to get a sufficient number of sources (by the way, is there a minimum acceptable quantity?), but, anyway, it should be back to be published in the mainspace.
Riktetta (talk) 10:31, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I have again reverted your edits on Milan Malpensa Airport. Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT all connections must be independently sourced. The airline/facebook and an involved airport fail that criterion. You also removed valid sourced request. The Banner talk 12:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Is there any reason you keep removing the numbers from Como's players? Raskuly (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

If you speak about shirt numbers, the season is over. New season numbers have yet to be released, as per today. Aniway, last modification is from last week...Riktetta (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Most if not all players will retain the same kit numbers from season to season. If a player's number is changed it should be changed when that happens, rather than blanking the kit numbers of all players. Como's website, the cited source, provides the kit numbers. Raskuly (talk) 12:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

What are you doing dude?, deleting all the league schedules that I have compiled and created?, deleting planning results by round, results summary for this season's league, etc, and call it vandalism??, are you stupid?, I matched all the league schedules for next season and made a sketch of the notes and you deleted everything so easily, where is your brain? Noussairelnouri (talk) 02:35, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

FIRST OF ALL, LOW DOWN YOUR TONES! The page saw a high load of vandalisms from both registered and UNregistered users, thus I restored to a previous verified versione. This meant that also some legit edits were canceled. I tried my best to restore those (like those you mentioned in above) but it can happen that some may needed to be re-done. This happen because users take initiatives WITHOUT matching page rules, not because I like to destroy someone else work. Your insult will be reported. Riktetta (talk) 07:01, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

And you changed the schedule for the Copa Italia, and delete the match time clock?, even though it was already listed on the Como calendar schedule and even listed on Google, and you deleted it??, what a stupid dude Noussairelnouri (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

see above Riktetta (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Regarding the position of the players in particular (Simone Verdi and Alessio Iovine), the ones you listed are all wrong. Alessio Iovine's original position is Right midfielder (midfielder), not defender.and Simone Verdi's original position is attacking midfielder (AMF), not striker/forward, source by Transfermarkt.com Noussairelnouri (talk) 03:14, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Could be... I just copied previous listed roles, I change nothing. Riktetta (talk) 07:02, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

For players who returned on June 30th, all should be listed in "player return transfers", even if the player has been sold, at least the digital footprint of the player is in Fp, and even if the player has not been sold or loaned back must be recorded in detail in the player's return on June 30, 2025, does not necessarily follow the list of players in the main squad Noussairelnouri (talk) 03:21, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

No, they're not. The rule that I also listed, is the standard for this type of pages. This is the type of iniatitive that do NOT follow page rules I was mentioning above: just because you think that something must be done, does NOT mean that it (actually) must be done. Riktetta (talk) 07:03, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Your thread on AN/I was removed by an administrator because it was malformed. Not sure if you saw that because it does not appear you were notified. So if you want to recreate it properly, you can.

That said, make sure you notify the involved editor, since it's a requirement. I've also gone ahead and warned the editor in question with the tier-1 WP:NPA-based civility warning. — Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 09:17, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the info. Sorry if I ask, what could I do in order to re-create it properly? As far as I saw, all the mandatory fields were filled...

TY in advance Riktetta (talk) 09:19, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Go here (this page is linked from the 'start a new discussion' button on AN/I), fill out the subject, the content, and make sure you notify the editor in question that your report is about. Further, for the content, make sure you link differences of the editor in question insulting you, so they don't have to do additional work in order to verify your claims, if not gauge their severity. You can get diffs, as they are commonly called (short for differences), by going to the history link at the top of any page, and clicking the 'prev' link of the history entry in question. Here is one such entry. I would of course recommend adding the aforementioned entry as well as others (should you find or know of them) to the report you're creating at AN/I.

As a small aside, depending on how the user in question responds to my warning, a report may be too soon. If they continue to personally attack you after the warning I left, that would be when to file. — Dædαlus^{+ Contribs} 10:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Just a note that Aeroroutes and its predecessor, Routes Online, is not a reliable source - see WP:AEROROUTES. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:21, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi

ok, thanks for the info. However there are several reference related to these website in a huge amount of airport pages...Additionally, as the destinations from/to RedSea airport are anyway available, would it be acceptable to restore them in Red Sea International Airport page, while a proper reference is found? Riktetta (talk) 11:25, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

It's only recently been agreed as unreliable, and it's used in over 1.8k articles... so yeah, it's still all over the place - there's a few of us slowly whittling it down when we have time, but it's going to take a long time! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 11:27, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cape Verde national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamed Hamdy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:51, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, actually just forgot to add the reference. Be informed that, in such cases, you can just add CN (Citation Needed) template (as an example {{Citation needed|date=December 2025}}) without un-doing edits. Regards
Riktetta (talk) 10:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Er no, we don't add CN tags for when people add unsourced content. CN tags are for when there's content that was added some time ago and never got a ref. It shouldn't have been added either, but it wasn't caught. It's plain and simple - if there's no source, it doesn't get added - end of discussion.

As for Turin Airport, you've restored two routes - one of which still has a fake citation. I assume you're going to fix that too, or am I reverting again? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 10:34, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Didn't realized about the other edit, done by un-registered user (that also seems to live in the future given tha date delivered... ). I corrected it as well. Riktetta (talk) 11:23, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Riktetta. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 15 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey.

And wishing you a joyful Merry Christmas and a wonderful, happy 2026. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 20:10, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Ciao! Allora io Loik l'ho inserito in quanto nato in un territorio croato e per le chiare origini straniere. Però al contempo considerando che era un territorio occupato e italiano ci sta che possa non essere considerato oriundo. --Valentinenba97 (talk) 11:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Ciao

in teoria, oriundo è chi ha una nazionalità straniera alla nascita, e prende poi l'italiana una volta che si trasferisce in Italia (sia per giocare a calcio, che per latre ragioni). Loik ha sempre e solo avuto quella italiana. Se sei d'accordo lo rimuovo.
Saluti
Riktetta (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2026 (UTC)