User talk:Rillington

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morning Edition (BBC radio programme) (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires secondary reliable sources with significant coverage to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morning Edition (BBC radio programme) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 18:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Rillington! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lewcm Talk to me! 18:52, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Fawlty Towers episode articles

Hi Rillington, I have noticed the discussion you began on the Fawlty Towers talk page, "Articles for each episode". I too agree that there are enough resources for these articles to be reinstated.

In the coming few months (I am too busy just at the moment), I will attempt to improve these episode articles using two Fawlty Towers books, and websites.

So, I was wondering whether you would like to help me in reinstating these articles, whether that be by adding additional sources, doing general copyediting, rewriting the episode plots to sound more encyclopedic, etc..

I will make sure to notify you when I begin this task.

Please let me know what you think. All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 12:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Rillington, just letting you know that I have now begun attempting to reinstate the Fawlty Towers episode articles, starting by improving the episodes that still have their own articles, "Waldorf Salad" and "The Germans". I think these articles should be improved first before the other articles are reinstated. "The Germans" in particular needs reformatting to look more like a modern episode article. So far I am working on "Waldorf Salad", then I'll start on "The Germans".

I would be interested to know what your thoughts are on how to approach this task. Mr Sitcom (talk) 10:25, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rillington. Thank you for your work on Medway RFC. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rillington. Thank you for your work on Marlborough RFC. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Rillington. Thank you for your work on Camberley RFC. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Related Articles