Your submission at Articles for creation: Shagwüf has been accepted
Shagwüf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks for your contributions to Ships In The Night. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969TT me 13:42, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
Hi there, I'm putting a post here rather than tagging the file for deletion as I clocked that there may be a conflict of interest with Draft:Ships In The Night
Essentially I'm just querying whether the image you've used is in fact your own work, as I've noticed it may be a press image that has been used in several publications.
If this isn't an image you have taken or own the rights to it may be a copyright violation and may not be usable on Wikipedia. Please could you clarify? sksatsuma 14:51, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I can confirm that I am the original author of the image. RobinIsadorable (talk) 15:20, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
@RobinIsadorable Hiya, I did a little bit more digging and saw it was also photographed at your place of work so assumed it was original work.
I'll leave be and not mark for file deletion, good work on the article btw! sksatsuma 15:26, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you and I appreciate your due diligence! 🙏 RobinIsadorable (talk) 15:32, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! Requesting an image update to reflect current members of Pretty Bitter
Hi!! I was hoping to see if we could change the attached image for Pretty Bitter to a current band photo. A couple of members feel more comfortable with current photos, as there have been some changes. thank you!! Mothboy1000 (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Sure! I could change it to a pic from Liberation Weekend or if there is a high quality, current band photo that is under a Creative Commons license available, we could use that. If the photographer uploads a picture they took to Wikimedia Commons or Flickr it can be changed easily. RobinIsadorable (talk) 20:41, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
It should be uploaded here!! File:Pretty Bitter Press Photo 2025.jpgPretty Bitter at Faux 8, shot by Bailey PayneMothboy1000 (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ships in the Night (musician) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thank you for the interesting article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Better source request for File:So Vam film poster.jpg
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука13 09:35, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Gheesling (February 17)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.The reason left by Guninvalid was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft could honestly go either way, but I'm gonna lean on declining. Sources are mostly good, but most of them are WP:INTERVIEWS, meaning they are not WP: INDEPENDENT and do not meet the criteria for WP:BASIC. It would be best to add 2-3 sources of coverage of Gheesling himself outside of interviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dan Gheesling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, RobinIsadorable!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! guninvalid (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Gheesling has been accepted
Dan Gheesling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hi RobinIsadorable. Thank you for your work on Dan Gheesling. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice start!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
