User talk:Rosebud1244

A tag has been placed on Draft:Edon Rizvanolli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 15:57, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Edon Rizvanolli seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Rosebud1244, I'm Bearcat. Please note that pages undergoing development outside mainspace, such as Draft:Edon Rizvanolli, are not allowed to be categorized alongside finished articles in mainspace, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories so long as it is outside mainspace, and this is not an optional rule that you're free to disregard or ignore.

You can provisionally list categories in your draft without affecting content categories by using one of the methods described here.

As the page has had to be pulled out of categories three times in 24 hours, do not readd it to categories again, because draft and sandbox pages are not allowed to be in content categories. Note as well that there can be consequences for disruption if it doesn't stop, such as page protection or deletion and/or the temporary or permanent suspension of your editing privileges. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Bearcat, sorry about that! I’m still pretty new here and didn't realize that drafts shouldn't be categorized like that. I definitely didn't mean to be disruptive. I’ve now removed the categories from the draft and I’m going to take a break from the article to make sure I actually understand the rules, before I touch anything else. Thanks for pointing it out and for the heads-up. Rosebud1244 (talk) 14:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Just to be clear, it's fine and acceptable for the page to have disabled categories on it, such as with a leading colon between the wikibrackets and the word category, as in [[:Category, or by wrapping the block of categories in the {{Draft categories}} template — the page just can't be filed in the categories as if it were already a live article, but textlinking to the intended categories isn't a problem. So since the categories had already been disabled with a leading colon by Quinntropy (and twice yesterday by me), you didn't actually have to remove them the way you just did — you just shouldn't reenable them by removing the colon from the category links, but disabled categories on the draft aren't a problem. Bearcat (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)