User talk:RotatingPirateShip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak SkyRide hoax (April 5)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Kuak SkyRide hoax to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Theroadislong (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, RotatingPirateShip! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kuak SkyRide hoax (April 6)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:
Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. This sort of "dog rescues man from well" story is the sort of thing newspapers publish to pad out a slow news day, it's not the sort of thing that belongs on an encyclopedia, because it very rarely has the sort of lasting impact that we require to consider an event notable.

Next steps

Scam warning

Athanelar (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello RotatingPirateShip! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Possible propaganda bot found, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI