User talk:Rsjaffe

Hello Rsjaffe, I did a edit about Bhatiary. But it was deleted. I am a native here and I did every edit for my hometown. Most people don't know about a lot of thing about Bhatiary so they come here. But unfortunately you deleted it. Nazifa Tasnim Nowshin (talk) 10:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

There were several problems with the edits:

1) They were not neutral, and included lots of opinions about the place. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Describing aesthetic opinions and reputations.

2) It appeared to use an AI/LLM to produce the writing. You cannot do this. See WP:NOLLM.

3) Wikipedia is based upon what reliable independent sources say about a subject. Personal experience about a subject is not allowed here. See WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE.

4) Many of the references were not reliable sources. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 15:50, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry to say not personal but I only edited it what was true. Gave the reference also. ~2026-24562-07 (talk) 00:43, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Why you deleted Col Hunny Bakshi page? Anujrewar555 (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Did you edit that page? Your account only has this one edit. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:56, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Yeah I only edited it to write something about my hometown.It's a very beautiful place but mostly people don't know it. ~2026-24562-07 (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Please revoke User talk:~2026-24612-18's Talk page access as this TA is abusing its own talk page. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Done. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:14, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

new spi - Against Dummy423 and that TA you just blocked. ~2026-24464-63 (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

@Rsjaffe I'm the subject of Draft:Darren Palmer (designer), which you deleted on 24 April 2026 under G15. I want to address the citation concerns directly. Every source was personally found and checked by me in a browser and all links resolve correctly. Some URLs from TV Tonight, Domain and The Canberra Times block automated requests due to cookies or paywalls, which likely caused the bot errors. I have a fully revised draft ready and Teahouse host Quxyz has offered to look it over before I resubmit. Would you be okay with me recreating the draft for that purpose? DarrenPalmerAustralia (talk) 04:38, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes. Just make sure you didn’t use an AI when writing the article. It’s now not allowed, which is stricter than before. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:52, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

the wiki user which is @Shadow4ya he is calling every users as a sockpuppet without any evidence i suggest you to block him because he did that for many years everyone is tired of him ~2026-25671-43 (talk) 14:42, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Hiya, I thought you would be aware that AlejandroMuller50 is saying some pretty awful things about you and atheists, we're all evil godless beings etc. Should TPA be revoked or do we just let them vent? I mentioned this at ANI a few hours ago & they've been escalating since then. Blue Sonnet (talk) 03:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I think TPA should be revoked, but I’m not the right person to do so. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:08, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Oh yep, that's a very good point - sorry to bring you back into this mess! Blue Sonnet (talk) 06:50, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

• Deepfriedokra

• EvanProdromou
• Wouterstomp

Interface administrator changes

L235

Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

• TheresNoTime
• Versageek

Oversight changes

Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

• Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
• The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

• The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
• Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
• Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
• The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• The May 2026 administrator elections are scheduled to run from April 29 to May 19. The call for candidates ends May 5.
• The 2026 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is scheduled to run from April 25 to June 1. Candidacy submissions close on May 10.
• A new noticeboard for non-urgent, batch page protection requests has been created, primarily for the enforcement of contentious topic restrictions.

Hi, wondering if you can take a look. You recently blocked user for adding spam links. Think they may have created another account as they're adding the same links back to the page again . Thanks! EM (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Requesting you to remove ECP of Lechtkaeaeia, whom I had reported here. The consensus on ANI was to at least remove his ECP right. Thanks THEZDRX _{(User) | (Contact)} 04:12, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I’d ask one of the admins involved in that discussion. I’m not seeing a consensus developed about that, and I’ve not investigated the case. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 13:52, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

How I Can Editing In Kurdish Topic? Dasani053 (talk) 20:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Make 500 more edits that are legitimate in a non-Kurdish topic, then apply for XC at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:11, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, rsjaffe.

I thought I added a COI statement to my profile, showing that I am a web master for Spacecom. Here's what I wrote:

I am a paid contributor. I am working on behalf of Spacecom / חלל תקשורת as the web master. My client is Spacecom. I will not directly edit the articles below and will instead make requests on the article Talk page for independent editors to review.

There are 2 pages: English: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecom Hebrew: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%97%D7%9C%D7%9C_%D7%AA%D7%A7%D7%A9%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%AA

What else do I need to do?

My client asked me to request an edit so their new logo can be posted.

Thanks,

User:Ashedit4pw

Ashedit4pw (talk) 05:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

That's sufficient. As to the logo, see Wikipedia:Logos for information. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 11:32, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Looks like we are having quite the "Oops" day... thanks for restoring! Impru20^talk 13:49, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi! This is probably a stupid question and I'm only asking it to learn something, I don't actually want to question your decision/ restore the article. At Draft:Rory Little 124 VS Britain's Got Talent you deleted the page for G12 infringement from Wikipedia itself, why does that not fall under "Public-domain and other free content, such as a Wikipedia mirror, do not fall under this criterion, nor is mere lack of attribution of such works a reason for speedy deletion"? Kind Regards and sorry for the annoyance, Squawk7700 (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Ouch! Thank you for pointing that out. All those pages are just remixes of wikipedia pages, so I'll undo the mistaken deletions. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:36, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Would it be more reasonable to speedily delete as blatant hoaxes (since none of what the user has published have ever existed, as there is no such thing as Rory Little 124)? Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:43, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes, although a little playing around on user subpages is tolerated. This may be taking it a bit too far. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:48, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

So I assume only the drafts would be deleted and not the user sandbox? Apologies if I may have been assuming bad faith. Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:49, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Right, although the user sandbox could be deleted too. This is a gray area. You're not assuming bad faith: I think some admins would delete on sight; others would talk to the author. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:51, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance and helping me learn more about what copyvios are and are not. Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:55, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

I just want to let you know that you recently closed an ANI discussion about revoking TPA and email, but the only change in the block settings was disabling their email, and the user still has talk page access. Beta Beta Beta - talk 21:40, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I fixed that. The blocking administrator was managing two blocks, and the one they altered didn't have the talk page option, so I blocked it on the other one. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:39, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Another question though, since the user in question has written a significant amount of disruptive material on their talk page, would blanking suffice or will the material be kept anyways? Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:43, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

I can take a look. I am one of those that doesn't remove a lot of stuff from user talk pages unless it was offensive. The disruption is local, and I think ignoring trolls is often the best course of action when we can do so. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:45, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Revert, block, ignore gives you the idea. I'd obviously revert if it were not on the vandal's talk page, but I'm going to try to ignore those edits. Other admins may differ, and someone might remove it. One or two of the comments do get close to crossing the line. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:54, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

I joined in wikipedia for 2 years and i did more than 10 edits and i want to know why i am not autoconfirmed ? Banbloku i dukagjinit (talk) 14:41, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

You are autoconfirmed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I checked their user rights and it doesn't appear they are autoconfirmed. I think Wikipedia may of changed how autoconfirmed works. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 22:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Ok I have read WP:AUTOC and it appears autoconfirmed is now given 4 days after the first edit and not 4 days after the account was created. See phab:T418484. Seems like a good update as some vandals create sleepers and make 10 dummy edits to get autoconfirmed and vandalise semi-protected articles. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 22:19, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

They made edits in 2024, but the page was deleted. I'm going to look into the technical issue a bit more. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:22, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Seems odd. Maybe it's counting the "first edit" as the first one made after the new autoconfirmed system was implemented. I'm not sure on the technical details. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 22:24, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm asking WMF folks about this now (on Discord--don't know if you use it, but conversation is at . — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:26, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

It's not listed there, but XTools says they're autoconfirmed. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:21, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Turns out XTools is just guessing, and it's wrong in this case. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 12:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

It'll be four days after your first edit this year. The deleted edits were ignored for gaining this status. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 12:06, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for picking up my slack on the Muboshgu/Baron Trump rev-dels. I blocked and was circling back but had to put out a figuritive fire IRL and got distracted.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:30, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

No worries. That was a thoroughly unpleasant editor. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:34, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I kindly request access to edit this page (Kurumba Gounder). I found that the article relies on single source and would like to improve this article. I am a scholar and I have relevant expertise to help edit the content. Please let me know if any futher information is required. Thank you! Cosmicdusts (talk) 22:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

You can make a non-controversial edit request on the talk page. Non-controversial requests are either uncontroversial improvements (correcting typos, grammar, or reference formatting; improving the reliability or efficiency of template code, adding an image, straightforward updates) or are already supported by a consensus of editors, usually on the protected page's talk page. Otherwise, you can't touch the castes subject until you have reached the minimum experience level (500 edits, account over 30 days old). — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your prompt response and clarification! Its very helpful. Cosmicdusts (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

• Asukite
• Bobby Cohn
• Bonadea
• Ca
• Drm310
• Reconrabbit
• Sammi Brie

• Tamzin
• TonyBallioni

• Ezhiki
• Queen of Hearts

Bureaucrat changes

• WereSpielChequers

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the "persistent usage of large language models" has been included as a common reason for a block.

Technical news

• Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

• The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
• The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous

• Voting for the 2026 Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election closes on 1 June.

Hi, can you please revoke the TPA for the blocked user ~2026-32651-96? They're abusing their talk page. Malgosha 15:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Nevermind, looks like their TPA already got disabled. Malgosha 15:21, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Palestine-Israel articles 5 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Staraction (talk · contribs) 18:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

I think you worded your request incorrectly, @Staraction. See my comment on that page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping, and yeah, looks like I did. Just added another a comment; apologies for any inconvenience this might've caused. Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 19:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, reaching out to you because you accepted my most recent WP:G4 deletion. These three articles were deleted via WP:LLMPROD and were recreated by the same user: Restlezz, Tomi Folayan, Zeeno Foster. From what I remember, they look exactly the same as they were before deletion. Could you confirm this? Thanks! InfernoHues (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

They're similar but slightly reworded. Overall structure and details are the same. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:12, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you :) InfernoHues (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey you Rsjaffe! Why you locked me!? RojasDawson (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1224#Long term disprutive edits by User:RojasDawson and all the messages on your talk page. Blue Sonnet has given you advice on how to apply for an unblock. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:45, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Question for you and Black Kite, as involved admins in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Report_personal_attack, does the behavior of Least Action (intentionally not linked) strike you as odd? user with under 600 edits who is SUPER well versed in Wiki procedure and ardently pushing a proposal they are writing for a block? I may be off the mark here, but this to me smells of a far more experienced user who has either been banned and then created a sock, or someone who is using multiple undeclared accounts... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:52, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

My impression is that this is a new user who just discovered AN/I and is a bit too enthusiastic. Hopefully they'll cool down with experience. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:56, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

100% defer to your judgement but just wanted to raise the concern. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:57, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

I think this is consistent with my view of the situation. You can see that they have needed intervention, both by Black Kite and myself, which is not great, but not enough to do anything special about yet. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:03, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

One of many reasons I'm not an admin. Appreciate your insight! Keep up the good work and thanks for the response. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Who knows? Maybe you'll change your mind and be ready for it some day. We need more victims volunteers. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

HAHA!!!! Maybe.... Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:08, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps this range should be blocked, like how 2600:382:37F8:2671:F1D2:C7E3:CCC8:8BC6/64 was blocked? 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 23:10, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

yep. done. thanks for the notification. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

This range could probably use a block. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I'll keep a lookout. The blocked editor only transiently used that range on a single date, unlike the rest of their edits, so it's not clear that a block would be beneficial there. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:13, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

sorry to bother i'm new to wikipedia, sorry if this is the wrong place to ask questions. But on your user page your userboxes are formatted to be in collums next to eachother and i was wondering how i could do that on my own page cuz it looks really nice. AUBSTRAWBS (talk) 18:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I did that so long ago I don't remember exactly how, but Template:Babel helped a lot. See the documentation there. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

thank you very much AUBSTRAWBS (talk) 22:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi rsjaffe. NormalguyfromUK is evading his block via TAs.

The page should be placed on semi-protection for a while as they inevitably keep coming back to it constantly, as you can see from the revision history. Thank you. Griboski (talk) 21:15, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

They found an open proxy. I've blocked that, the TAs, and reverted those edits I could. Protected the article, too, though that's not the only NormalguyfromUK target, so it's best to keep on knocking down the socks when they show up. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:25, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

You have deleted my professional page. What is the specific reason? Cortalane (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

The page was created by an account that was banned for undeclared paid editing. We don't allow those edits to stand. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:34, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Am I allowed to attempt to reconstruct the same page with my own personal account? All of the information was accurate. Cortalane (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

You can write an article about yourself de novo. Using some of the blocked paid editor's text would be problematic, since there is no appropriate disclosure from the paid editor, and it could trigger disclosure requirements for you, too.

A basic hurdle to having an article is that the subject must be notable, according to how Wikipedia defines it. For people, read WP:BIO. If an article doesn't include information establishing notability, it is much less likely to survive the review process.

There are lots of potential problems with writing an autobiography: please carefully read Wikipedia:Autobiographies, which will provide advice. Also, note that there will probably be extra scrutiny of the article since it was formerly written by a undeclared paid editor who was part of a cluster of editors who probably work together or are fake identities concealing a few individuals controlling all the accounts. This raises people's suspicions about subsequent attempts, so care should be taken to follow the recommendations at Wikipedia:Autobiographies. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:11, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

If, after reading that material, you still want to create an article, you may find Wikipedia:Article_wizard useful. Most editors do better if, before writing their first article, they become familiar with writing in Wikipedia by contributing edits to articles already there. You could, for example, improve articles that fit your interests. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:44, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

This page Teesri Begum has been deleted twice, including once by you with following details-

17:46, 9 June 2026 Rsjaffe talk contribs deleted page Teesri Begum (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Alakmarsaify) in violation of ban or block) Tag: Twinkle (thank) 19:09, 31 May 2026 Izno talk contribs deleted page Teesri Begum (G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Shubuam chak) in violation of ban or block) Tag: Twinkle (thank)

This page seems to be relevant and important a it deals with a Hindi film recently released, which also garnered attention because of the "Jai Sri Ram" controversy.

The page was deleted possibly because of being created by a banned account.

Kindly allow/permit me to create this page once again. I have requested to the other Administrator as well.

Regards, Endofworld123 (talk) 03:50, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

I don’t think there’s anything in place to prevent you from creating it. I deleted it because of who wrote it, not because of what the subject was. You might want to start it as a draft and have it go through articles for creation review, just to make observers more comfortable about the article, given its troubled history. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:07, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

I would most humbly like to state that I am doing this purely as an Editor of Wikipedia.

At the same time, I would also respectfully state that I am directly creating the page, instead of creating the draft, because there is certainly a need for such a page, which can be created by me.

I hope you would agree to me after having seen the final page.

Regards, Endofworld123 (talk) 08:15, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Dear sir,

I have tried to make the page Teesri Begum as informative as possible, though there is certainly a scope for betterment and additions to the given page.

Hope to get your approval to it please.

Regards Endofworld123 (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

May i know why undo my edit? EdwardA78 (talk) 04:38, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Clicked wrong button. I’ve already restored it. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:38, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Yeah i see thanks EdwardA78 (talk) 04:39, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't think we usually tag temporary accounts, similar to how tags were not added to IP user pages. I always see tags not being applied to TAs reported at SPI. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 22:25, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't tag many socks, usually leaving it for the closer, but do tag when I'm sure there's not going to be a checkuser evaluation. I tag TAs because, unlike IPs, a TA represents an individual. Tagging an IP would harm the next person the IP address rotates to. On the other hand, I can see not tagging a TA as they are sort of throw-away accounts.

In response to your question, I reviewed the administrators' instructions for SPI. Turns out they have instructions for registered accounts and for IPs, but not for TAs. That's odd. So I went asking around.

When the TA accounts first started up, there was no consensus about whether to tag or not, so the instructions have not been updated. Now there appears to be a consensus. The consensus is not to tag, unless it's one that you want to be able to look back at in the future (e.g., for developing an edit filter or because there's a lot of edits by the TA that might be good to review later looking at another account).

So, thanks for the question. I learned something, and now the administrators' instructions are going to be updated. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:47, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

hello! ive been lurking thru ANI and just have a question out of genuine curiosity about a comment from Least Action referring to "the hexagrams". this isn't terribly important and im sure you have better things to do, but i just wanted to know 1. what the comment means and 2. why it was inappropriate in context. thanks in advance!

happy editing, InRRainbows Lets chat! 12:22, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

REVDEL needed. AIV history, and history of the Talk Page of that User Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

The three edits before the three most recent ones, may there be REVDEL there, too? Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 04:38, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Make that the four before the last three of that user. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

I don’t think those are at the level needing rev-del. Just obscenity. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:43, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Only confused a little. I thought, though, maybe I'm interpreting it too broadly, that obscenities ought to simply not exist on Wikipedia. If somebody looks at the history of one of those pages, there's a chance they'll run into it. That's all. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Here’s the discussion on overuse: Wikipedia:Revision deletion#Misuse. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 04:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

OK. I understand. Maybe, it was a little broad. Since its introduction in 2010, there's been a concern that Misuse/Abuse of REVDEL may occur. So, I'll keep that in mind when I request REVDEL in the future. It's got to be really clear that Admins dissenting is not too probable (my words, based on what I read). Mere unwise language, for example, is usually not enough. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. And thanks for the REVDEL you did, as well as for blocking them and revoking TPA. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 04:53, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

In the 2026 FIFA World Cup page, there is a flag in front of Lionel Messi, then why shouldn't there be a flag in front of Virat Kohli in cricket? Rudraaac (talk) 16:27, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

An uninvolved administrator handles unblock requests. Since I am the one who blocked you, I won’t handle the request. Discuss this on your own talk page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

I am discussing, but first you answer my question Rudraaac (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

A clarification request in which you were a party has been closed and archived. This is only a notification, and no action is needed on your part. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 03:04, 19 June 2026 (UTC)