User talk:Rushbugled13/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rushbugled13. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Surprising edit summary
Good faith?? 79.123.74.157 (talk) 08:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Someone makes an edit which (a) messes up the formatting of a section heading by removing an =, (b) gratuitously adds the word "water" by itself, not even in a sentence. And that edit must have been made in good faith, because it does not fit into any of the categories in a list that someone has made of the commonest types of vandalism? That really seems to me to be an odd interpretation of the expression "good faith". I would have thought that "good faith" referred to the intention behind the edit. How it could be an "accidental edit" I am not sure. It might be mistaken for a "test edit" if one only looks at the edit itself, but a test which produces nonsense ceases to be a mere test and becomes vandalism when the editor decides to walk away and leave it in place rather than revert it. Since in this case the edit had been left for well over five hours before you reverted it, I think we can safely conclude that the editor had no intention of reverting. I had thought, in fact, that your edit was an example of automatic and unthinking use of Stiki. Many people using such tools as Stiki and Huggle make the mistake of thinking that doing so removes the need to think about edits, and just automatically click on one of the default options that such tools give them, frequently producing inappropriate results. The message above was intended to be a gentle pointer to the fact that you might have done that, in the hope you would think about it. However, from what you say it was not a case of such automatic use of Stiki, but a definite decision that the edit should be treated as good faith. However, I still find the idea that something is not vandalism if it is not on a list headed "Vandalism on Wikipedia usually falls into one or more of these categories" an odd one. I am also by no means convinced that it doesn't fall within the types enumerated in that list, under the heading "Silly vandalism". 79.123.74.157 (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
- Another one and more and more. Are you sure that you have really made a considered decision in each of these cases? I counted 63 Stiki edits in one hour. I never use Stiki, but I do use Huggle, and I never achieve a rate of anywhere near an edit a minute over a prolonged period, and I very much doubt whether anyone can really be giving sufficient thought to each edit at that rate. If the only result of haste is inappropriately edit summarising as "good faith" when there is vandalism, perhaps it is not a significant problem. However, hasty use of automatic vandalism tools is very likely to lead to more serious errors, such as reverting perfectly good edits as vandalism. I do suggest that you think about this. 79.123.74.157 (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Mobile Monitoring
Hi Chris, you have declined the publishing of the article Mobile Monitoring. Can you help with fixing it or be more precise what is missing, so it can be made live? Why is Mobile Monitoring ok for the Germen Wicki and not for the English one?
Jschweizer - SWITZERLAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jschweizer (talk • contribs) 08:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kate Dimbleby, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Ian Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Rejection of Sean Burch contribution
Hi, Thanks for reviewing the Sean Burch contribution page. Can you please be more detailed with specifics on what I need to do to get this accepted? I've looked at other submissions and contributions, and my writing seems to fit in with everything applicable as well as sourcing the info. Please help. Thanks. Alexia Stuart (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC) Alexia Stuart
Anton Kuivanen vandalism
Hi, I noticed that you reverted vandalism on article about Anton Kuivanen. The article has been maliciously edited multiple times in a short period of time. Previous activity: . There seems two users whose nicks are "Pertti11111" and "Jorma74" who are vandalizing the article. I'm not certain if I can give them a warning or if it would help at all but can you warn or sanction them (ban) for intentionally vandalizing the article? 130.234.207.176 (talk) 10:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Rejection: UFC 155: Dos Santos vs. Velasquez II
Hi,
I saw recently that you rejected the creation of the article for UFC 155. I added some data to the article (including an image) and I'd like for you to take another look at it and re-consider your decision.
Although I did not create the article, I believe it is reasonable and apparent enough to see that the article is NOT a test as you suggested. Aside from the facts that the topic and content of the article are specific to a real-life upcoming major sports event and that it is filled with real sources for the content discussed, there is nothing in the article that suggests it was created as a test article or that a reader would consider it to be a test article upon first view.
Furthermore, I believe that the article meets the notability guidelines for sports events listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28events%29. Specifically, there is both a great depth of discussion regarding the background and importance of the event, and there is a diversity of listed sources. The outcome of the event will impact the championship of a weight class within the largest mixed martial arts organization in the world, which meets the "lasting effects" guideline. All of the event participants even have their own Wikipedia articles, with the main event of the fight card featuring the current and former champions facing each other in a rematch.
The event is upcoming on December 29th, and I (and I'm sure other MMA fans) would appreciate it if you reconsidered your decision before then.
Thanks,
Accountingkid (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter
Grupo Rush
Edit to the page of Reina Hein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Henrik_Wenøe
From AFC Submissions
overrated!
Why are all the reviewers contradicting themselves? One time you say that the article needs more references and at other times you say that is not the problem!
Why are you declining this article?
Rejection of Rails Camp Article 9th November
Article for Re-Submission
Awaiting reply to previous post
you suck
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
Rejection - Central Communications Command
Request reconsideration of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kathleen A. Marchione (politician)
Article for creation : Last Curtain Call
Delivered at 12:42, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BAYADA Home Health Care concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BAYADA Home Health Care, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BAYADA Home Health Care
Hello Rushbugled13. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "BAYADA Home Health Care".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/BAYADA Home Health Care}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Please note
That User:Filmmakerjohnb appears to be "John Borowski", and it was recently ascertained that the entirety of his article here at WP was self-published from his self-authored IMDB biography. The John Borowski article has been wikified (first pass), and has some real references now, and all the puffery removed (see here for what appeared before: and ).
This is called to your attention, because he is also apparently the direct source behind the articles on the movies and books he has done, and your name appeared here, , as mediating the review of one of them here at WP. If he plagiarised and broke self-publication and NPOV rules (not to mention delivering entirely unsourced content in a new article), he may try to do this again. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 04:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please approve the journal's entry
A kindly request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Felunayak (talk • contribs) 21:42, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Dayereh
An article that you have been involved in editing—Dayereh—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Wildhorse3 (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)