User talk:Ryuudou
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Explain
Can you explain why you're removing "Sub-Saharan African descent" for pages about Black people in different countries like Black people living in France or Japan? Sub-Saharan Africa is Black Africa, like how North Africa is Arab Africa. I reverted your edits because I'm confused. I'll undo my reverts if you give me a good reason why Kpop777 (talk) 07:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- There are many millions of Black African people descending from countries above the Sahara too, and the sources support this. There is no arbitrary line in Africa where a black person is allowed to be from. These people are included and should not be erased. Ryuudou (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Black people in the Caribbean have origin in Sub-Saharan Africa. The page about Black people on Wikipedia mentions in the first paragraph all Black people have ancestry there, or they're indigenous Australian or from Malaysia. Sub-Saharan Africa is Black Africa, anywhere else in Africa isn't black, like Libya in North Africa is Arab because North Africa is considered Arab Africa. Give me one Black African country in Africa that isn't Sub-Saharan Africa and I'll undo my edits Kpop777 (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- "Sub-Saharan African" is not a scientific term. It's psuedoscience. Neither are terms like African-_____, which simply refer to all people of African descent. Ryuudou (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Kpop777 (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- its not psudsoscience. There's critics of the term but It's a widely used term to classify the regions of Africa South of Sahara desert and has nothing to do with science. I see other people remove "Sub-Saharan Africa" on pages from time to time so since I'm outnumbered that it should stay, you can change the pages, I won't do it myself because I still disagree with you, but I won't revert your edit. There's over a hundred countries and at least some Black people in each one mostly, you have a lot of removing to do because lots of pages not all but lots of pages have that. Kpop777 (talk) 05:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Kpop777 (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- "Sub-Saharan African" is not a scientific term. It's psuedoscience. Neither are terms like African-_____, which simply refer to all people of African descent. Ryuudou (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Black people in the Caribbean have origin in Sub-Saharan Africa. The page about Black people on Wikipedia mentions in the first paragraph all Black people have ancestry there, or they're indigenous Australian or from Malaysia. Sub-Saharan Africa is Black Africa, anywhere else in Africa isn't black, like Libya in North Africa is Arab because North Africa is considered Arab Africa. Give me one Black African country in Africa that isn't Sub-Saharan Africa and I'll undo my edits Kpop777 (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
March 2026
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to North Africa. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Skitash (talk) 22:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.