User talk:Samizambak

Hello. Please stop spamming music-related articles with dubious, poorly-sourced claims. --Omnipaedista (talk) 15:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

The name derives from pandur, a Sumerian term for long-necked lutes.^[1] Source of our knowledge about this instrument is since the ancient Greek Mantineia marble (4th century BC), now exhibited at National Archaeological Museum of Athens, depicting the mythical contest between Apollo and Marsyas, where Greek Pandouris is being played by a muse seated on a rock.^[2] Lutes have been present in ancient Greece.^[3] They were also present in Mesopotamia since the Akkadian era, or the third millennium BCE.^[4]

You misrepresent what your sources say. The only source of those four that talks about Sumerian origins is Erkut et al. — but this is not a reliable source about linguistics. --Omnipaedista (talk) 16:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop spamming my talk-page; please respond here. --Omnipaedista (talk) 16:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Here is what a reliable source says., Mauricio Molina's book Frame Drums in the Medieval Iberian Peninsula says "10 While it is also possible that the term pandero derived from the latin adjective pandus (curved, bent), the most current theory based on phonetic development from Latin to Spanish sustains that the word pandero comes instead from pandura pandorius. It also has been explained that the term pandura itself derived from the Sumarian pandur or pardur (little bow), which suggests that the pandura was an instrument that evolved fiom some kind of musical bow. However, these words are never used in theSumerian literature in connection with musical instruments. See H G Farmer. "An Early Greek Pandorw," in The Science of Music in Islam. ed Ehckhard Neubauer (Frankfurt Institute for the History of Arabic-Islamic Science at Johann Wolfgang Goethe University. 1997), 2/301. Organologists have commonly identified the pandura as a kind of Greco-Roman lute Their conjecture is based on the description by Pollux of Naucratis (second century A. D) of the instrument us a tricHOEdon (instalment of three strings) The panSuta is rarely found in GrWco-Roman literature or musical iconography. It was comprised of a long, thick fingerboard and a small resonating body. Representations in late Roman sarcophagi indicate that the instrumet had three strings or more and was plucked with either fingers or a plectrum, It is also important to take into consideration that both Marcianus Capella and Isidore of Seville identify the pandorius with a wind instrument made out of cane. Isidore, quoting Virgil (Eel. 2.321, further ascribes the instrument's invention to the god Pan. and" - so the article title is ok, just the content is rubbish. :) Dougweller (talk) 17:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=XYJ1AQAAQBAJ&pg=PT669&lpg=PT669&dq=pantur+instrument&source=bl&ots=_PcYAjC9Xf&sig=I2jJlyL5NnmLnQH40rRb9qgkvA4&hl=tr&sa=X&ei=c1DEUr2LC5SA7QbTh4DYDw&ved=0CCkQ6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=pantur%20instrument&f=falseSamizambak (talk) 17:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

And he cites the organologist Curt Sachs The History of Musical Instruments (1940). That's a long time ago. The Sumerian word for lute is 'gudi'. and the author of that is an expert in Sumerian.. Organologists aren't. Dougweller (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Sumerian pandura.png is clearly from although it's interesting that it is called there a harp. Your rename is clearly original research. I note that 3 of the files you uploaded there have been deleted, one of them as recently as the end of November. Dougweller (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• Noting that it's now been deleted. You seem to be being less than truthful in licensing the images you are uploading. Dougweller (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The pdf by Andrij Hornjatkevyè is just that, a pdf someone named Andrij Hornjatkevyè wrote and put on the web, fails WP:RS by a mile. Farmer is a reliable source and you are misusing him. Sure, he says "it has been surmised" but he makes it clear that "no such words have come down to us in Sumerian which actually indicate an instrument of music." Now you must have read that so it seems pretty obvious you are misusing this source. If you think Farmer actually supports your claim, take it to WP:RSN. If you don't do this and continue to make such claims I will conclude that you are just editing disruptively and take you to WP:ANI. Dougweller (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Vallja e cobanit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 04:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload unencyclopedic images, you may be blocked from editing. Stop your copyright violations. You uploaded this image and claimed it as your own work. Yet a simple image search shows it is this image, a copyright image from this page. And I quote: "Images on this site are protected. Permission is given for teachers and students to use the images for non-commercial educational purposes. When an image is used on a website, notify me of the site and kindly credit me for the image. A link to the Digits site would also be appreciated. Use of images for commercial purposes or non-profit, for-fee use, requires permission from William Allen." - Slàn, Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 03:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC) - Slàn, Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 03:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Please refer to the pictures uploaded by the addition of.--Samizambak (talk) 21:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC) A newly added photos?Samizambak (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

• 31 August 2013 Samizambak (talk | contribs) uploaded "File:Kemerli Kilise. Fresco.png" (User created page with UploadWizard)--Samizambak (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

These days no files added today or this month has been added by me. Add an image to this day if I give notice accordingly. These files are added as will be seen this month is not even mine.--Samizambak (talk) 23:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC) Affected:

• File:Cami kahve.png 30 August 2013, 18:18:04

And also:

• File:Dundar evi2.png 29 August 2013, 11:25:33
• File:Dundar evi.png 29 August 2013, 10:27:37
• File:Kemerli kilise5.png 29 August 2013, 09:22:10
• File:Ottoman tirilye.png 27 August 2013, 19:07:36
• File:Batheos Rhyakos Soteros Monastery.png 13 August 2013, 21:09:51
• File:Pelekete monastery.png 13 August 2013, 20:27:39
• File:Sofali cesme.png 12 August 2013, 23:38:22
• File:Tire meatballs.png 1 August 2013, 12:35:08
• File:Hittite tambourine.png 29 July 2013, 14:01:41
• File:Vanotlupeynir.png 15 July 2013, 19:27:29
• File:97 2687tazeotlar2-15.jpg14:26, 30 June 2013--Samizambak (talk) 00:11, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chickpea noghl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop spamming Wikipedia with links to unreliable sources as you did here —Omnipaedista (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions about Turkish cuisine. I observed that you sometimes use the word köfte and sometimes meatball for the very same dish. How about changing köfte to meatball ? Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6fte

Despite the absence of meat in meatballs and I have to write them say köfte?--Samizambak (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Stuffed chard, appears to be directly copied from http://en.cyclopaedia.net/wiki/Yaprak-(food). Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Stuffed chard if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kömbe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hatay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shiksaray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Turkish

Teke zortlatmasi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Turkish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Teke zortlatmasi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 09:11, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTDIC. Creating article stubs like Shiksaray, Kasap havasi and various other stubs that you have created do not require additional independent article, if they can be merged with other main articles of the same topic. For example, I have merged articles Shiksaray, Kasap havasi into Turkish dance. Merging articles is a tedious task. I hope you read WP:NOTDIC (Wikipedia is not a dictionary) before creating other articles. Kind regards. Harsh (talk) 10:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Larchemi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.openmuseum.org/objet/show/1034?facet=2328.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miskal for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Bensci54 (talk) 01:44, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chagane, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXs5kpvatgs.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Miskal, Samizambak!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please consider expanding the stub.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zaharya Efendi Mir Cemil for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Chamith (talk) 19:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mesir macunu, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.turkishtradition.net/?p=375.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Elmaların yongası has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence to indicate notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 09:41, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Soltane Ghalbha (şarkı) to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Soltane Ghalbha (şarkı), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elazığ dik halay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Seljuk eternity sign, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —swpb^T 18:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sikitita, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.olint.com/en/farming-olive-varieties/sikitita.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aşağımollahasan höyük, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Özalp. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kazaziye for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 19:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Caucasian armpit drum. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nagara (drum). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nagara (drum) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Yintan  20:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caucasian Dhol. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yintan  20:42, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Doli (musical instrument), you may be blocked from editing. Please, stop this. "Caucasian armpit drum" does not make ANY sense. Yintan  20:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Some names of davuls include:

• tupan (Goranian: Tupan)
• davul (Turkish: davul)
• daul, tǎpan, tupan (Bulgarian: тъпан, тупан)
• tapan, goč (goch) (Serbian: тапан, гоч)
• tapan (Macedonian: тапан)
• tobă/dobă (Romanian: tobă)
• tabl (Arabic: tabl or tabl baladi)
• tof (Hebrew: tof תוף)
• daouli (Greek: νταούλι), literally meaning "drum"
• lodra, tupana, daulle (Albanian: lodra)
• dohol (Persian: دهل duhul/dohol)
• doli (Georgian: დოლი doli)
• dhol ([դհոլ dhol] Error: {{Langx}}: text has italic markup (help))
• towla/dowla (Syriac: ܛܲܒܼܠܵܐ)
• dahol (Kurdish: dahol)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Caucasian armpit drum, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Yintan  20:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sut ictim dilim yandi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheKaphox T 21:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

The article Yandim Efem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, and has inadequate content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, please try not to leave bare references around. This means in the reflist, it shows up as a plain link. Please see this video on how to properly cite sources. Thanks :) --Jennica✿ / ^talk 11:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Let me know if you have any questions - seems like you're still doing it.

Please interlink to a Greek pages. If the subjects aren't notable in Greek Wikipedia, why they are here?Xx236 (talk) 11:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. You have new messages at Talk:Girl from Ushak.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Song lyrics are copyright, and it's not okay to add them here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Sjö. Samizambak, thanks for creating Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be great if you added more sources to Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists), to show that he is notable per Wikipedia standards.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sjö (talk) 10:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for your work adding Nikos Oikonomidis and his music. The articles are good examples of wikiformatting and using infoboxes. However, I question that the artist and his music are notable enough for their own articles. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (music) and explain how he and his music is notable. As far as I can see, there isn't even articles in the Greek Wikipedia, and the sources are not independent from the artist. I also noted that many of the sources you use as references don't support the statements they are supposed to source. Please find sources that support the statements in the article, and don't use misleading sourcing. Sjö (talk) 11:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ni ke Dre ‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Most of the sources you added recently to various articles don't even mention the statement they are attached to, or they are non-reliable sources. Sjö (talk) 06:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Raikos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Domdeparis (talk) 12:59, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Raikos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Domdeparis (talk) 13:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Silaw. I just saw your edit on the Sari Gelin article and I wanted to say that it would be nice if you could add more information about the Kurdish version of this song, like adding the lyrics and maybe some cultural references.
Sipas.
—Rye-96 (talk) 13:43, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikos Oikonomidis (violinists) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sjö (talk) 14:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. You have new messages at Talk:Burçak Tarlası.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please put spaces after any punctuation. Commas, periods, parenthesis. This is the proper and correct way. Thanks --Jennica✿ / ^talk 02:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC) Thanks--Samizambak (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Aydın karşılaması. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

The article Zarkadio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 11:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Nikos Oikonomidis songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sjö (talk) 05:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Esmer Kızlar Edalı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jennica✿ / ^talk 08:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Külhanlı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jennica✿ / ^talk 08:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Çarşıya Vardım requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jennica✿ / ^talk 08:22, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

The article Gelin Ayşe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 00:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Şafak Söktü requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jennica✿ / ^talk 10:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

The article Ulah Havasi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 21:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ah Dede Vah Dede (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jennica✿ / ^talk 03:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Olmaz Olsun (song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TopCipher 18:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Konyalım şak şak çalar kaşığı, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Winged Blades ^Godric 13:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Ksekina Mia Psaropoula, Samizambak!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ağrı Dağından Uçtum

added links pointing to Armenian and Kurdish

Alaylar Alaylar

added a link pointing to Sinop

Çökertme

added a link pointing to Anatolian Greeks

İpek Olsam

added a link pointing to Anatolian Greeks

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Do you have a famous recording to mention? In ictu oculi (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you added a link to God Rest You Merry, Gentlemen on Hurrian songs. Do you have any reliable sources claiming the two songs are connected? Clarinetguy097 (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpxN2VXPMLc
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCYSITWpKIk

--Samizambak (talk) 11:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, they do sound kind of similar, but I think that would be considered original research by Wikipedia's standards. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Tiridine bandım should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiridine bandım .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 18:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Hoyda yarim should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoyda yarim .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Giota Lydia should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giota Lydia .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ordunun dereleri should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordunun dereleri .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

On this article you have a Greek And a Turkish composer. Unless they worked together this cannot be correct. Once a song is composed, it remains composed by that person. Can you check, please. Thanks. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Surmeli vay, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 09:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cerkez kizi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 19:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ciguli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. St0n3 BG (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Shaskin should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaskin .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Winged Blades ^Godric 15:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi,

I've just reviewed the 86 articles you created which were in the pending new pages feed.

Unfortunately, there are multiple issues with most of them. The three main issues are:

1. Notability. These articles may fail WP:NMUSIC due to the lack of sources and content, both of which are issues in their own right.
2. Grammar. Nearly all of the articles had incorrect spacing. While I understand this may be difficult for new users, you might want to rectify these. I have done the first ten or so, you can copy and do the rest.
3. Completely unreferenced articles. A few of your articles are totally devoid of references in any form which means we cannot verify the claims made nor the notability in and of such articles.

Please reply here and ping me in using {{ping|DrStrauss}} if you require any further assistance.

Thank you,

DrStrauss talk 21:59, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gia na xereis alaniari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gia na xereis alaniari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DrStrauss talk 09:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hopak seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 07:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agistri (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agistri (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Yayla Suyu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no sources located, Turkish article doesn't have sources either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Blessed thistle with lamb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources since 2013

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spudlace (talk) 11:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

The article Bahçelerde Menekşe Uy Gelin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) and other listed information does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (music) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Bende Binem Kar Kara Atlara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) and other listed information does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (music) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Samizambak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged İzmir Bomb Kurabiye for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 10:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from İzmir Bomb Kurabiye, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. As the article no longer violates copyright it should be fine, but for future reference the creator is not allowed to removed speedy deletion tags - a reviewer or admin has to do that. Thank you. JW 1961 ^Talk 14:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article İzmir Bomb Kurabiye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İzmir Bomb Kurabiye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

It would be better not to move or redirect pages that are subject to an open AfD, as you did with İzmir Bomb Kurabiye, because this can cause confusion. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Filiz Makarna, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Turkish pasta companies Samizambak (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Turkish pasta companies indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Filiz_Makarna Samizambak (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Balparmak tatlısı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.greece10best.com/melomakarona/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Muğla halkası requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://greecebyagreek.com/2016/04/27/greek-easter-cookies-koulourakia/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Miskender, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makarnalı köftender is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makarnalı köftender until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— Pamphylian ● 💬 08:52, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Tirilye Rûm Cemetery Monastery, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Melceü't-Tabbâhîn has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Marie finger biscuit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:35, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak,

Thank you for creating A Manual of Turkish Cookery.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A BEFORE search indicates that there are many sources for this book. Kindly edit the article, add more information from independent and reliable sources. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:27, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Filiz Makarna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tirilye Rûm Cemetery Monastery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

The article Mana m' irthen i anoixi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable folk tune, no significant coverage; unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lennart97 (talk) 19:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miskender, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak

Thank you for creating Balık çorbası.

User:Valereee, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The fact it was included in the first published ottoman cookbook is a credible claim of notability, but more sources would be very helpful in supporting that.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Valereee}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—valereee (talk) 18:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

The article Swallow's Nest, Tirilye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable toursit resort. Unreferenced in almost a decade

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marie finger biscuit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Kadayıf noodles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.pastrysampler.com/Questions_and_Answers/kadaife.htm and https://taste-the-globe.webflow.io/ingredients/kadayif. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. /wiae /tlk 22:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Kadayıf noodles. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samizambak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Samizambak (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadaif Samizambak (talk) 19:27, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I saw that I blocked you unfairly. I just transferred the information from another page of wikipedia. Samizambak (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Not important. I will continue to make articles in Turkish wikipedia. You can follow what I have done there.Samizambak (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

"I just transferred the information from another page of wikipedia" Yes, that would be a violation of copyright. You've been warned about this for almost a decade, over and over and over again. --Yamla (talk) 20:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

There are wrong links to the languages ​​related to the kadaif page. They are all mixed up. I tried to fix them. I will fix the link again from the Turkish wikipedia. Kadayif dolması is a variant of kadayif. It connects with the kadayif page.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaday%C4%B1f_dolmas%C4%B1#:~:text=Kaday%C4%B1f%20dolmas%C4%B1%2C%20Erzurum%20mutfa%C4%9F%C4%B1ndan%20T%C3%BCrkiye,%C5%9Feker%20ve%20limon%20suyundan%20haz%C4%B1rlan%C4%B1r. Samizambak (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to care about my situation. Samizambak (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaday%C4%B1f

There was a mess on the page I made. Tel kadayif information was transferred incorrectly. Also, this dessert is very old, its history is wrong. Samizambak (talk) 18:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Kataif, known as flat kadayif in Turkish,

It is one of the examples that can be shown as an example of Arab-Turkish cuisine interaction. Flat

The type of kadayif that has been filled and fried with walnuts and sugar since the 10th century.

It is still done in Malatya and Hatay provinces (Isin, 2018).

https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1066464 Samizambak (talk) 18:36, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samizambak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Samizambak (talk) 05:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a good reason to unblock you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can see my work. If there is a situation that harms wikipedia, why are my pages published? In addition, all the work I have done for 10 years is obvious. It has been mentioned that I have been warned for 10 years, but please check it, including my latest work. Samizambak (talk) 06:54, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I am not a new member. I have been creating pages for 10 years and the pages I have made are published. Also, I have added and corrected many pages. I do not accept the accusation made against me Samizambak (talk) 06:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samizambak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Your reason here Samizambak (talk) 07:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As noted above, "your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. When making a request, you must replace the "your reason here" text with your request. 331dot (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi! I understand from your comment above that you copied Kadayıf noodles from Simple Wikipedia – is that correct? If so, I will restore that page. Because of the terms of our Creative commons licence, WP:Copying within Wikipedia always requires attribution for the work of the editors who created the content (this applies to translations as well as direct copying). If that attribution is not provided your edits are likely to be reverted or deleted, as happened here – I'm sorry, but how were we to guess where it was taken from?

I'm prepared to consider unblocking your account if you will do this: go through all of your edits, and list here, on this page, any of them where you copied or translated content from another Wikipedia article (yes, that's quite a lot of work). If there are other articles that were deleted because of unattributed copying, list them too – it may be possible to restore them. If I'm satisfied that your list is substantially complete, I'll unblock your account on condition that you then make sure that the copying is attributed in every case (I'll show you how to do that, of course). Is that acceptable? – please let me know! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kadaif I added this page.You can check if you wish. Samizambak (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

I still look blocked. Samizambak (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Correct. You are indeed blocked. You have failed to convince anyone it would be a good idea to lift your block and you have refused to answer the question posed by Justlettersandnumbers above. --Yamla (talk) 12:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I did not reject the question. I don't have any other translation. Samizambak (talk) 12:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I asked Justlettersandnumbers to reply to me. Thanks for your help but I'm waiting for Justlettersandnumbers reply. Samizambak (talk) 12:09, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

I believe in Justlettersandnumbers sincerity. We solve the problem among ourselves. Samizambak (talk) 12:14, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

The link as kadaif is wrong. Kadayif is the common name of many desserts in Turkey. It is a dough made from wire kadayif mentioned here.Kadayif noodles should be the title of the article. Samizambak (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yassı kadayıf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

I can't help you because I've been blocked. Samizambak (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yass%C4%B1_kaday%C4%B1f Samizambak (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Samizambak. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Yassı kadayıf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Areti Ketime songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Petros Gaitanos songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Cretan Turks cuisine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Aintabli (talk) 03:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harkuşta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harkuşta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 01:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bahçevan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahçevan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Entarisi ala benziyor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entarisi ala benziyor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 02:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabardıç is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabardıç until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 06:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

My dear friend, I cannot make any changes to the English Wikipedia because I am disabled. I opened the page with its sources in Turkish wikipedia. Samizambak (talk) 13:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

The article Elmayı top top yapalım has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katıverelim Rakıyı Da Şaraba Katıverelim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katıverelim Rakıyı Da Şaraba Katıverelim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

The article Chacha Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This building does not meet notability criteria. It has not received significant coverage and is mostly just defunct tourist curiosity. The most important reference here is a press release, which does not meet Wikipedia:Notability. Rest of references are travelogues and random websites, and even they just mention it superficially. Did not notify creator because the account is blocked indefinitely for repeat copyright violation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

The article Stis Triantafilias Ta Fila has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged uncited a long time ago. A search throws up several recordings but there is nothing in the article to explain how it is notable. Not sure why this is marked mid-importance for Wikiproject Turkey. Maybe it is notable for Greeks? But if so why no Greek article?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 11:30, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to the article Haliva. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. -- Brunnaiz (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Same goes for Lepsi (dish) and Libje lebje basta. -- Brunnaiz (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

I would love to help. I can't help you because I'm blocked. Samizambak (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tahini_roll&redirect=no

You can check the page from the Turkish page, which has been redirected incorrectly. Samizambak (talk) 05:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

The article Hicaz Buselik Jewish Kanto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No one has shown it to be notable since it was tagged many years ago

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:16, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

The article Anası Kızından has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I searched but I could not find enough good sources to show notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

The article Aydın Karşılaması has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I searched but I could not find enough sources to show notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkish tango music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish tango music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 10:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

The article Amed nesîm-i subh-dem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

The article Amorgos Sousta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The article Elmalıya Yangınım has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never charted, never been covered, can’t find other sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roasted (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konyalıya Güzel Derler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konyalıya Güzel Derler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aintabli (talk) 05:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Haris Alexiou songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Gagauz cuisine has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 09:08, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi Samizambak. Thank you for your work on Tahini roll. Another editor, Kingsif, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Note: does not appear to be copyvio, based on copypatrol check and edit history period vs the later web source causing the flag.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kingsif (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)