User talk:Saturnpilot

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bradley International Airport has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bradley International Airport was changed by Saturnpilot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896391 on 2013-09-13T19:47:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Bradley International Airport, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.BDL-MCO is not seasonal, it operates Saturday only throughout the year, and BDL-DCA is mainline on US Airways in the fall if you check the schedules. Please stop reverting these changes. Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 03:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

You are sort of right with DL's service to MCO -- it seems to have 'intermittent' breaks in service, it will operate for a few weeks in a row, and then take a week off. I'm not sure why. However, since the service is fairly consistent throughout the year, I would hesitate to call it seasonal. Thoughts on this? Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 03:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm HuffTheWeevil. Your recent edit to the page Philadelphia International Airport appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HuffTheWeevil / talk / contribs 05:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Please read edit summaries which are trying to help you. Guidance at WP:AIRPORTS suggests all new routes need a proper WP:RS reference giving an exact date of change. Also if something you have enered is reverted it is polite and required by WP:BRD that the dispute is taken to the article's talk page rather than simply reverting again - that behaviour is edit warring and you may be blocked from editing for that. Andrewgprout (talk) 00:09, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Saturnpilot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 20:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

• Bradley International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Saturnpilot. You were reported for edit warring at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Saturnpilot reported by User:Markvs88 (Result: ). I see that you removed a notice about this from your talk page. Are you planning to make any kind of response before an admin has to make a decision on your case? It looks like you have continued to restore the same item since 27 February, which appears to meet the definition of edit warring. You did not provide a source for your claim, and you have never posted on the article talk page to explain your edit. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Saturnpilot, you've been warned for edit warring. You may be blocked the next time you revert at Bradley International Airport unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nashville International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 18:02, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

One of your edits to Rapid City Regional Airport is incorrect. You noted that Delta Air Lines (Delta Connection) is ending service to Salt Lake City on 5 October, 2022. There are no current news statements provided on this topic, Rapid City Regional Airport confirmed with me that service is not ending to Salt Lake City, and the source you cited is a news article from last year, which contains dates that do not match your edit. (talk) 12:31, 27 September 2022 (PST)

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm The Banner. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Columbia Metropolitan Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Banner talk 03:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

This is a legitimate source. The services on Allegiant were announced today and announced by the airline itself. Nothing can be more of a legit source than the airline itself. Saturnpilot (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

No, my friend. WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT demands in dependent sources. So it is improperly sourced. The Banner talk 03:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Columbia Metropolitan Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Banner talk 13:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rhode Island T. F. Green International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Additionally, please learn how to properly cite and not use bare URLs as you have been told repeatedly. Also, not sure how many times editors can tell you this, but Simple Flying is not a reliable source per WP:SIMPLEFLYING VenFlyer98 (talk) 22:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Your inability to use edit summaries, reliable sources (including independent sources) after multiple warnings, and inability to respond to your Talk Page is making me think there could be a possible competence issue here. VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, connections must be sourced with independent sources. By no means can the company website of Frontier be seen as independent from Frontier. Please be aware of that and use correct sources. Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 19:07, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles.

Posting this again. The lack of communication about this, as well as the lack of communication about any Talk Page messages and just deleting the messages several times is starting to make me think there might be a WP:COMPETENCE issue. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 15:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC))

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Bradley International Airport. VenFlyer98 (talk) 19:38, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Deleting your talk page messages implies you have read them. Please read them and listen to their feedback. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2025 (UTC))

@Saturnpilot you are still adding bare URLs. Please stop. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:31, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

@Danners430: Hi again, honestly I wouldn’t even message this user, it’s another one where WP:CIR may be an issue. If you go through this Talk Page history, you’ll see I’ve been leaving these messages for a long time now, but the user never responds, just occasionally blanks sections of the page. I bring up WP:CIR since part of that is “the ability to communicate with other editors and abide by consensus” and this user has shown a serious lack of communication to these messages. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:43, 16 October 2025 (UTC))

They’re still at it… is it perhaps time for ANI? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

@Saturnpilot Note that communication is mandatory - is there a reason why you are ignoring all talk page messages? Not communicating is a reason for admins to block users, which is why I'm trying to hard to get you to discuss your edits before that stage is reached. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 08:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

@Danners430 I haven't been ignoring you or anyone at all. I just don't know how to respond. I'm big into aviation, work in the industry and follow routes. I post articles that are permitted to be referenced when I see a new route announced. Just trying to help and I find and confirm things are true, like new routes that I post/add to pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saturnpilot (talk • contribs) 21:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

First of all, please sign your posts. Secondly, if you work in the industry then you likely have a conflict of interest, so you should be following the advice left below. And thirdly, if you're not ignoring these messages, why do you continue to add bare URLs when it's been explained why these are a problem and how to improve them? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean by sign my posts? I don't mean to post bare URLs, which I also don't know what they are, sir. I just confirm if a route is confirmed and valid to start and post the link. I try to find the best links possible when posting on a page for a new route starting. Saturnpilot (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

If it's that much hassle, I'll just stop for good and delete my account. Not worth all this hassle when I just try and contribute truthful stories and articles to new airline routes starting when I see them. Saturnpilot (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

You’re signing your posts now, so thank you. As for bare URLs, that is literally what is explained at the beginning of this section - please have a read. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Don't mean for any trouble, just trying to post truthful and honest airline routes to the appropriate articles and referenced with the most accurate information possible. If all of this is too much, I'll delete my account and never come back if that's the better route. Saturnpilot (talk) 21:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Please have a read of what's written above here - it's not difficult to turn bare URLs into full citations, and indeed there are automated tools you can use to generate the full cites. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Will do. All good now if I follow what's above? Saturnpilot (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Aye - just to note, when we post on your talk page we're trying to discuss with you for the sake of helping. We're not here to bully or criticise, we're all a team here :) Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:54, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, appreciate that! Saturnpilot (talk) 22:12, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Will say that there has been a conflict of interest issue already. Check out this edit from September on Dulles’s page: . COI warnings have already been left on the page, there’s one still here now but they’re usually blanked (see here: ). User continued to edit the page despite the warnings. Happy to see communication finally, better late than never, but with how long messages have been left here, the lack of communication until now has been concerning. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC))

One other thing to add about URLs. The bare URL reference you added to Albany International Airport included the referrer information (i.e. stuff that is personally traceable to you) and is not something that should be included in a reference. Take a look at the article history to see exactly what information I removed when I corrected it just now. I must say though that having read everything above, if you aren't capable and/or willing to add references properly then perhaps you should consider not adding information. Your choice, but we're all here to help you if you are will to try. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

@Saturnpilot I send this message almost as a last chance - communication is mandatory, and you’ve been ignoring multiple editors who have raised genuine concerns about your editing. Please respond to them on your talk page. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

@Danners430 I responded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saturnpilot (talk • contribs) 21:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! VenFlyer98 (talk) 18:21, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bradley International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. It's really hard to know if you are vandalising articles or not if you don't give an edit summary. Play nice or stop giving us all work to do please. 10mmsocket (talk) 21:25, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

I haven't edited Bradley International Airport recently pal, you have the wrong person. I haven't touched it and stopped doing so. Saturnpilot (talk) 21:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

So you're saying that this edit yesterday by Saturnpilot, your last edit before replying to this talkpage message wasn't you? 10mmsocket (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Ah yes, I only took PHX out of American's destinations because they do NOT serve this route, only Breeze. Whoever put it in there, did it without sourcing. It's completely false. American hasn't flown this route ever, it was US Airways before the merger! Saturnpilot (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Which brings us right back to your lack of edit summaries. Can you understand why you get reverted and why people get to do extra (sometimes unnecessary) work when you don't make it clear what your intensions were? Again, if you don't want to play nice, don't play. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

As you well know, Aeroroutes isn’t reliable per WP:AEROROUTES. Thank you for finding alternative sources, however you shouldn’t have restored the Aeroroutes source in the first place - I’d recommend you remove it. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC) Wilco, sorry I forgot.

Hello! Thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations: try the Citer tool, or in the wikitext editor, try the reFill tool, and in the Visual Editor, the reference dialog can convert some bare urls into a full citation. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles.

Once again, a reminder to please try to avoid using bare URLs. Not sure how many times this can be repeated. (VenFlyer98 (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC))

@Saturnpilot why are you persistently ignoring messages left on your talk page? You’re STILL adding bare URLs, even though multiple messages have been left. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 00:13, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

@Danners430: Was going to leave this message here (again) because once again, the editor was using bare URLs. This has to be a WP:CIR at this point, right? (VenFlyer98 (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC))

At the very least it's lack of communication… definitely wouldn't disagree Danners430 _{tweaks made} 00:31, 27 January 2026 (UTC)