User talk:Sauer202

What is the P_max of the 6,5 × 55 mm SKAN and can you provide a C.I.P. TDCC like reference or references regarding this standard? For the C.I.P. 6.5×55mm case 3,988 bar (398.8 MPa) would yield a similar bolt thrust as the C.I.P. .308 Winchester chambering the modern SIG Sauer 200 STR match rifles must be capable to use.--Francis Flinch (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Will see if I can dig and find pressure and dimension specifications for both the original 6.5x55 specification as well as SKAN. I am quite certain that 6,5 × 55 mm SKAN is officially rated for 380 MPa as measured according to the C.I.P. method, but sources are needed. In the meantime I can provide some info that may be of relevance.

Vihtavuori provides reloading data for 6,5 x 55 SE / 6,5 x 55 SKAN with the max pressure for both set at 380 MPa,^[1] and write "do not use with Krag-Jörgensen, Mauser M1896 or similar rifles".

For competitions in Norway under DFS the maximum permitted chamber pressures as listed in the competition rules have been:

• 250 MPa in 6.5×55 for the youngsters (rekrutt) aged 11 to 15 years.^[2]
• 330 MPa in 6.5×55 for Krag-Jørgensen.^[3] Ammunition made for the Krag by Raufoss is said to have been reduced further to 280 MPa during the 1960s or 1970s, for example with the «RA SUPER sierra» and «RANO super» factory ammunition, but a source is needed for this. The well known Norwegian handloading manual Ladeboken also mentions 280 MPa as a safe pressure for Krag.^[4]
• 380 MPa in 6.5×55 for SIG Sauer 200 STR and Mauser M67.^[3]
• 415 MPa in 7.62×51 for Sauer and Mauser.^[3]

Hot factory ammo is available for Nordic Rifle Field-Shooting, for example "Norma Diamond Line Felt 6,5 130gr / 8,4g" with a muzzle velocity of 900 m/s in a SIG Sauer 200 STR with a 740 mm barrel.^[5] The pressure is not stated by the manufacturer, but since it is used in competition it is probably close to 380 MPa.

Even though the same pressure is set for both 200 STR and M67, the 200 STR is considered to be much stronger, similar to how a Remington 700 is considered much stronger than a Mauser 98 (the M67 is built from old k98's). It is not uncommon for handloaders to load past this without pressure signs. To paint a picture, the following are unsourced examples loads used by handloaders, but it can give a rough idea. These are for a 9 gram (140 grain) bullet in SIG Sauer 200 STR with a 740 mm barrel:

• 6.5x55 SAAMI pressure, 350 MPa, 810-820 m/s.
• 6.5x55 CIP/SKAN pressure, 380 MPa, 860-880m/s.
• 6.5x55 handload max (without pressure signs), 415 MPa (.308 pressure), 900-920 m/s.
• 6.5 Creedmoor, 435 MPa CIP pressure, 830 m/s.

In the other end of the spectrum we have the Krag. It is a strong action, but not as strong as the more modern Mauser og Sauer actions, and as 100 year old competition rifles that could go through thousands and thousands of rounds, wear became an issue. Decent Krag loads have been available that achieves a lower pressure using heavier bullets and slower burning powder.

Older pressure ratings for the 6.5x55 are also interesting, because they may have been measured with different methods such as CUP.

Sauer202 (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Svensk Jakt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, European Cartridge Research Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 14:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, European Cartridge Research Association, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:01, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Elgin Gates, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The article Scandinavian Ammunition Research Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth sources from independent reliable sources to show it passes WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Scandinavian Ammunition Research Association was merged into European Cartridge Research Association. Sauer202 (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Non-magnified optic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-magnified optic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Sako 75, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Add red links to “see also” sections. I won’t tell you again Celestina007 (talk) 22:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for taking the time to give me feedback. I suppose this is about red linking to Tikka T1x from other Sako .22 LR rifles. It is not something I do too often, but I will end the practice. Sauer202 (talk) 08:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Workpiece, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Pinchcliffe Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elgin Gates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barrel threads

added links pointing to Enfield, Zastava, Husqvarna, Sako, Tikka and Ruger American

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Sauer202 (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apache Synapse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SFTP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disc coupling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Servo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Fanatec, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. IceWelder [✉] 18:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the International Practical Shooting Confederation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. The logo has now been replaced with a .png version. Sauer202 (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Google Search, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Your Money or Your Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Det frivillige Skyttervesen logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

I see that the official logo has been replaced by this homemade variant: (picture on the right)

It is okay I guess, although it seem a bit unofficial. Sauer202 (talk) 18:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The article IPSC Armenia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources cited, searching finds little, fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 17:21, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello @Gab4gab: The organization seems to not be active. I have no problem with the deletion. Thanks for letting me know. Sauer202 (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

I see that more sources now has been added by another user, so deletion may not be warranted. Sauer202 (talk) 18:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scrum (software development), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Advanced technology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 18:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sentroller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Controller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 07:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Shoulder dolly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, it is hard to find good sources which are not advertisements, but it is clear that the topic in question is a very useful tool for moving objects. Not sure if I can contribute more on the matter. Sauer202 (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the French Shooting Federation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Launch control (automotive), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center console.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, fixed. Sauer202 (talk) 06:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Tool board, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:24, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Cane holder, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 22:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating Brake balance.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:44, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating CoreXY.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Possibly should be merged into a broader article. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

The article Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 7 years, WP:BEFORE does not turn up any articles

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 09:53, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Dynamic Shooting Association Singapore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202

Thank you for creating Mainspring (firearms).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milliradian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Data mesh

added a link pointing to Data platform

Kaggle

added a link pointing to Data platform

The Echo Nest

added a link pointing to Data platform

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fanatec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Data mesh

added a link pointing to Data platform

Kaggle

added a link pointing to Data platform

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Data management platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data platform.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Translation (geometry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pitch angle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Import One-Stop Shop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello onel5969, and thanks for the heads up. I don't have time to work on that article, and therefore would like to contest the move to draftspace, and hereby ask for the article to instead be listed under Articles for deletion to get broader attention, and if the article is not of high enough quality, to be deleted. Sauer202 (talk) 12:47, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Sauer... no worries. Have moved it back, and removed the unsourced material. I think it is notable, just the current sourcing doesn't have enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show it. I didn't want to delete all that material, which is why I moved it to draft in the first place. But I've marked it reviewed, since I don't think AfD is warranted. Thanks for all you do on the project. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cane holder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cane holder".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communication and leadership during change, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Character.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DMAIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resource planning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Sauer202. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fanatec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Positive locking device

added a link pointing to Cotter pin

Splunk

added a link pointing to Repository

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Furniture screws, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello User:Onel5969, I have added some sources to the furniture screws article. While I have submitted the draft, I do not have the patience to wait up to 4 months for it to just maybe get accepted. I therefore ask if it can be included in mainspace again, or that it is listed for discussion if you do not think it passes in its current state. As a side note, knock-down fastener could also be considered for merging into furniture screws. I am generally not a fan of draftspace, since in my experience that is a place where stubs are left to die - in other words just a long, painful and non-transparent deletion process.. Sauer202 (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello User:Onel5969, I have now moved the article back to mainspace with the following reason: "I hereby contest the move to draftspace, and in the event that the article in its current state is not deemed suitable for inclusion in mainspace I ask that it be listed for discussion instead". Sauer202 (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Behavioral pattern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Recursive function.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

What is the intended target of Conflict Minerals Regulation? It is currently a self redirect. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello Eejit43, thanks for letting me know about the error. I have changed the target to Conflict minerals law#Conflict Minerals Regulation in the EU as intended. Sauer202 (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anchor modeling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data vault.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unit of work, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transaction.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Motorcenter Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Motorcenter Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Effectiveness (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Effectiveness (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Unified Process

added links pointing to Scrum and Timebox

Essential systems analysis

added a link pointing to Object-oriented analysis

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Toroidal propeller, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bicycle lighting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glare.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Stringbike, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:54, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited DMAIC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Data-driven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Probability mass function, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Probability function.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samir Thapar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir Thapar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User4edits (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Decision time instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decision time and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @Robert McClenon:. I was a little unsure what to do since I was asked to "pledge" to publish it. Sauer202 (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Who asked you to make that pledge? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon:, apparently it was from a standard template. You can see it at Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Draft:Decision_time. Not exactly plain language if you ask me. And in general, I think Draftspace is the worst, most user unfriendly place on Wikipedia. Sauer202 (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Staircase, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

The article Guam Shooting Sports Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Virtually no content or context, no secondary sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Why are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? I contested this deletion, but it still went through. Sauer202 (talk) 06:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on IPSC Cayman Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 16:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Kyrgyzstan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Cayman Islands requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

The article IPSC Kyrgyzstan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no substantive content, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Curaçao Practical Shooters Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 04:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@AusLondonder: Hello, Wy are you systemaitcally removing articles about notable sports governing bodies which have been standing for about 10 years? Yes, they can be expanded nd more sources added, then please do tag them as such. But to claim that they are unsourced and not notalbe is not true. Do you have an anti-sport agenda or something? Sauer202 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

The article Guam National Shooting Sports Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources to demonstrate notability, only a dead external link.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 10:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Aruba Practical Shooters Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Moldova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 11:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Gibraltar Pistol Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello @AusLondonder:, Do whatever you want, per all my last replies it is clear that I strongly disagree with your approach to this matter. I'm not going to try to reason with you on your power trip. Sauer202 (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

You really need to stop your personal attacks.

I replied to you on my talkpage but you haven't responded. AusLondonder (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry if you have perceived any of my posts as personal attacks. What I want to ask for is collaboration and guidance. Thanks for your input. Sauer202 (talk) 08:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Aruba Practical Shooters Club.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of IPSC Moldova.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Channel Islands Practical Shooting Association.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Guam Shooting Sports Federation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, have you been working on adding sources to any of the IPSC articles? AusLondonder (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for reaching out. Of those nominated, I only had time to work on IPSC Kyrgyzstan and Guam (Marianas Practical Shooting Association). Sauer202 (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Sauer202, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lars Rönnbäck, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Rönnbäck.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Cycling tunnel. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the page! The "examples" section unfortunately lacks references. It would be great if you could add some (perhaps from the linked wiki articles)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of long tunnels by type, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedestrian tunnel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

The article Safety area has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seriously niche use for a relatively generic phrase. Current usage does not meet WP:GNG (one primary source), current content possibly infringing on WP:NOTGUIDE as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hemmers (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shooting ranges in Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting ranges in Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemmers (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of shooting ranges in Akershus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shooting ranges in Akershus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemmers (talk) 16:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

The article Isle of Man Target Shooting Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, no evidence of meeting WP:ORGCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 00:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Collibra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collibra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Isle of Man Target Shooting Federation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drill press, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Splash guard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fork end, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SRAM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Plunger (hydraulics). Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please convert the image labelling to English, and also use English sources. Also, it looks like parts of this were translated from Russian which is fine, but you should acknowledge that on the talk page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 21:27, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Spring plunger. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

section needs sources

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 21:31, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Social pornography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social pornography (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

꧁Zanahary꧂ 02:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Josef Průša, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:01, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zimbabwe Pistol and Smallbore Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimbabwe Pistol and Smallbore Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Welcome to Pandora (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Tyre and Rim Technical Organisation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moulton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Drill stand. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating a page on they type of tool; it serves a clear purpose. the page has a clear structure and is appropriately linked from other places. It has one unreferenced section, and would be helpful to resolve this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:41, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Austrian Association for Practical Shooting.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Voron Design, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:48, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Home position. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for helpfully bringing this translation across; it reads well. Just a minor point - having citations after punctuation also applied to brackets.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:57, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

You created the page about multi-jet fusion early last year and said in the edit summary that it had been translated. Where from? Phil Bridger (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, it was translated from Norwegian Wikipedia. Sauer202 (talk) 13:13, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

The article IPSC Bosnia Herzegovina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting WP:NORG. Single sentence permastub sourced only to a directory listing.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. AusLondonder (talk) 14:22, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Papua New Guinea Practical Shooting Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Laos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 05:09, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Nicaragua requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 14:00, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Saint Lucia Shooting Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 17:30, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on IPSC Kuwait requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 21:17, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Kuwait requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on IPSC Sri Lanka, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AusLondonder (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 18:06, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, @Deb which edits exactly? I am confused Sauer202 (talk) 18:10, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I think you created an article called IPSC Sri Lanka, which has been deleted, but it was some years ago. If you have any personal connection with IPSC, you should declare it on your User page. Deb (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Deb I do not have any conflict of interest with regards ro IPSC. I can not see any of the points in the message above nor or the page Wikipedia:Conflict of interest being relevant to me in this case. I must say I am very confused as to why you assert this? Sauer202 (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

I didn't assert it, I just mentioned it. From your contributions, you appear to be particularly interested in the organisation and its events, and I wanted to remind you that you have to declare it if, for example, you are a member or an official. That's all. Deb (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IPSC Kuwait is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPSC Kuwait until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 20:23, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Bolivian Practical Shooting Federation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content other than restating of the organisation's name. Fails WP:NORG.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. AusLondonder (talk) 22:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

The article Practical Shooting Federation of Venezuela has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources, virtually no content other than a re-stating of what the organisation is. Fails WP:NORG.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. AusLondonder (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on ARC Ratings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Orange sticker (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi Sauer202. Thank you for your work on Backsplash (interior). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this concise article on an everyday topic, but it's great to have. Well done for spotting that it was missing, and adding this through an acknowledged translation.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)