User talk:Programmatically

Your addition to the article about Maxwell "Maxwell believed in the Trinity, which played a role in his development of differential equations that unified electricity and magnetism." was reverted because the reference did not mention Maxwell. There are other examples of your additions with non-useful references, hence reverted. Please be metriculous in your referencing. David notMD (talk) 11:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

I think the article should have some part about the subject but I understand why the edit was reverted. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop adding questionable sources such as personal websites and newspaper articles for science related article content. see wp:RS - DVdm (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

What pillar of Wikipedia are you basing your argument on? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

You are using synthesis (WP:SYN), again. I understand the temptation. We all use synthesis often. But it is not allowed in Wikipedia. It takes a lot of self-discipline to realize when you are doing it and avoid it. You are making a statement and then adding sources as evidence. Your statement may be correct, but we do not use sources that way. Statement must be paraphrased from reliable sources (WP:RS), not synthesized. For example, you use a NYT column as a source for “Maxwell's equations is an example of mathematical beauty”. But the source does not say that. It tells us that someone conducted a poll of the Readers of Physics World magazine for the greatest equation and that Maxwell’s equation were among the top vote getters. You are citing that as evidence of beauty. It is flawed synthesis. The poll was not about beauty. There is no WP:RS to show that the population polled is representative of the rest of the world, and the winner of a beauty poll may still be ugly, if all the contestants were also ugly. Your conclusions may be correct and useful, but Wikipedia does not want your conclusions. They want you to accurately paraphrase reliable sources, and only that. Constant314 (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Well I give up then. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

I could add a specific factual claim but I not going to add anything else. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

There is a minority (probably shrinking) us that think scientific articles should be rigorous. We are trying to turn you into one of us. :) Constant314 (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

How about this? Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, Maxwell's equations has often been described as the most beautiful mathematical idea.

^[1][2] ScientistBuilder (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Not even close. The Feynman ref tells us that the authors think Maxwell's equations are beautiful. The second one describes a poll where Maxwell's equations were highly voted, but it doesn't say that they were nominated for beauty. Constant314 (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

well I have work to do on atomic clock and linear algebra ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

What makes General relativity's statement "Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, general relativity has often been described as the most beautiful of all existing physical theories." valid but "Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, Maxwell's equations has often been described as the most beautiful mathematical idea." invalid? ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@Constant314 ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

@ScientistBuilder: an important difference between the statement in General relativity and the one in Maxwell's equations, is that the former was established by wp:CONSENSUS on its talk page, whereas the latter was not. Or at least not yet. If you like to include the statement in the Maxwell's equations article, you need to make your case there (Talk:Maxwell's equations#beauty) with the relevant article contributors. Up to now, I have not seen a consensus there. - DVdm (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

There is also the principle that bad practice elsewhere on Wikipedia is never justification of new bad practice. Constant314 (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi ScientistBuilder! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:47, Saturday, February 19, 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, \common.js, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, \Atomic Clock. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Atomic clock. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Atomic clock. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Atomic clock

added a link pointing to Mercury

System of linear equations

added a link pointing to Matrix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Don't do this: ${\displaystyle 4.35*10^{-17}}$

Instead, do this: ${\displaystyle 4.35\times 10^{-17}}$

Or better still, within text, do this: 4.35×10⁻¹⁷

The only time to use asterisk is if you are giving an explicit example of computer code. Constant314 (talk) 23:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

@ScientistBuilder:If you do not give the page number in your in-line citation, then you should append the rp template to give the page number. This will be especially appreciated by any reviewers.

See Template:Rp. Constant314 (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Think te "Resolving the gravitational redshift within a millimeter atomic sample" arxiv.org article in open access pdf format might interest you. See https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2109/2109.12238.pdf.--Francis Flinch (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes I think it is very exciting ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

I will stop copying content ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you are listed as contributing spoken articles for Leonhard Euler and Maxwell's equations on Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia/Currently recording. This is a reminder as it's been over two weeks. --JJLiu112 (talk) 06:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

I have made progress on the recordings but don't know how to attach the recordings. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Question, is it possible to open up and repair the article about „Nontology" (engl) or „Nontologie"(ger) and would you like to help to work it out? But it is so to speak a wide field caused by the fact that Nontology is not only the science interested or focused on „nothing" as a non-ontologic and finaly empty source between positivity and negativity like the simple idea or calculation 0=1+(-1) It's definitely more then that, so for example a pseydo religious movement for atheists and their ability to believe in something if it's nothing! Also philosophic aspects, parts of parapsychology, mysticism and occultic meanings are united under the flag of nontology! What do you think about that complex and let me know please! Very nice greetings so far'n no fear! I very please 4 help! (; Jenz Jenzen (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea what you talking about. I am a Christian that believes that Jesus was God and man so I am not interested in this. For details see, my Wikipedia user page and the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian creed and the creed of athanasius and the apostle's creed. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Dear Scientist Builder,

Kabiryani here or Kabir for short! I am a new Wikipedian but I have set out to fully reference the 'Latin letters used in Mathematics' article! I see that you know a lot about SI units and your help would be much appreciated. I would be especially gracious if you could inform the members of the Mathematics WikiProject about the lack of citations on this incredibly important page! --Kabiryani (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

What article do you need help working on? The Latin letters in Mathematics? ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, the article is now called List of mathematical uses of Latin Letters! I am struggling to find citations for subjects such as linear algebra because my mathematical knowledge extends to trigonometry. I'm still in school so I've got lots to learn. I could use your help in finding the occasional citation that I am incapable of finding! If that interests you of course. Kabiryani (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Several of the requests you've posted at WP:RX have replies. If someone supplies what you asked for, you are expected to mark the thread {{resolved}} so that it can be archived and volunteers no longer have to wade through it, or to respond with an explanation of why it is not resolved and what still needs to be done. Please take this opportunity to update your resource requests.

Also note that two of your requests appear to be for the same whole book. Such duplication is not helpful, and the service will not supply entire copyrighted books for legal reasons. If you can narrow your request to a modest portion, such as a single chapter, someone may be able to help you. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

I am working on marking the requests as Resolved. ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ScientistBuilder

Thank you for creating Snow plow routing problem.

User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for adding this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whoisjohngalt}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

@Whoisjohngalt Where can I find the note you sent me? ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Dear ScientistBuilder, the note I sent you is above, I just thanked you for adding the article to Wikipedia and I also marked your snowplow problem page as Reviewed.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

What articles are copyright violations? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa I understand I breached the copyright for the cross product by inserting material from a book that was not mine. I will not edit by quoting a book and violate the copyright and make my own understanding instead of close paraphrasing. ScientistBuilder (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Programmatically (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I will not copy and paste or close paraphrase or not follow the image copyright laws or not cite sources. ScientistBuilder (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 21:41, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Programmatically (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Copyright is intellectual property that is illegal to put to Wikipedia and subject to jail-time and prison and other punishments. Copyright and fair use balance each other, for example Google vs Oracle's Supreme Court case was about was Google's use of the Kotlin API, which is built on Java, an infringement on copyright? Copyright is part of the law, including the Berne convention, the 1995 agreement known as TRIPS decided upon by the World Trade Organization. Copyright applies to books, DVDs, logos, audio sound recordings, and movies, though this is not exhaustive of all domains that copyright applies to. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act is the standard for online materials, for example pdfs of copyright books are removed because of DMCA takedown notice or a lawsuit that closes pirate bay sites. Recently all Internet Service Providers in the United States were ordered to block three sites displaying copyrighted television and streaming media, even the ones mentioned by the judge in a ruling. Copyright is present in DVDs with All rights reserved and continent specific enforcement, such as differences between European and American media. The point is that follow the copyright and don't steal, similar to how the Bible says, "Thou shall not steal." in Exodus and Deutoronomy. The work of copyright has been extended from 50 years to 20 +50years after the death of the author, for example if Adam the first man to ever live died in 1945, the copyright would expire in 2015. I don't understand why the previous unblock request didn't tell the whole truth.ScientistBuilder (talk) 01:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

see below — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa@Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Programmatically (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Explanations in my own words of copyright on Wikipedia. Copyright is a concept that means the right to publish, reproduce, distribute, make money from, and make changes to a work of art such as a book, painting, movie, or video game. Wikipedia is licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and GNU Free Documentation License. You cannot import work that is GDFL but not CC-BY-SA copyrighted or have permissions to use from the original author. You cannot use copyright work because Wikipedia has to honor the law and not commit piracy. Wikipedia can use copyright if the owner puts the work in the public domain or licenses it with Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Wikimedia Commons does not allow No Derivatives or No Commerical use but images can be uploaded to Wikipedia as fair use. Works from the US federal government such as nist.gov are acceptable on Wikipedia. After many years, usually 50 to 100 years, works become public domain and are no longer copyrighted. I will use Wikipedia guide pages on copyright and the creative commons licensing web site to prevent copyright infringement in the future. I will use Wikipedia The Missing Manual published in 2008 to make sure I don't put material that is copyrighted on Wikipedia and get blocked again. ScientistBuilder (talk) 22:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

see below — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

This misses all of WP:FAIRUSE. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Yamla@Diannaa

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Programmatically (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Wikipedia's fair use policy is a way for copyright materials to be used if there is no free alternative. For example, I uploaded a logo with a No Derivatives Creative Commons license to Wikimedia Commons but it was deleted because the Wikimedia Commons community has decided that final products are not allowed and you have to be able to modify the works. I personally disagree with banning No Derivatives or No Commercial Use because I see art as a goal towards a finished product, but the consensus is different from my opinion. Anyways, the file for the 2019 Redefinition of the International System of Units was deleted but someone else uploaded the image to Wikipedia under Fair Use for me. Sometimes images can be used on Wikipedia and not on Wikimedia Commons. I hope I have demonstrated I understand Wikipedia Fair Use.

Accept reason:

see below — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

ScientistBuilder (talk) 12:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Why did you say Wikipedia's license "No derivatives?" Does Wikipedia allow derivative works, or not? I am not talking about images here; I am talking about prose.

Please describe how fair use applies to prose (not images).

Please simply answer the questions; you don't need a new unblock template for each reply.— Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Fair use in the case of text is the limited use of copyrighted text without permission from the owner of the copyright text. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa Fair use does not interfere with copyright's basic objectives. Fair use was created to balance the interests of the public and the owners of the copyrighted works. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

In what types of situations would fair use of prose be appropriate?— Diannaa (talk) 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa The article and the subject of the fair use text are dependent on each other and related to each other. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

That doesn't answer the question. The question is, in what type of situation would you copy some text as fair use rather than writing your own prose?— Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

I need to find the answer. Where is a good Wikipedia article on fair use prose? @Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa If the text is in the public domain I can copy the text without writing my own prose. ScientistBuilder (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Programmatically (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

If the text is in the public domain I can copy the text without writing my own prose.ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You have shown you now have an adequate understanding of copyright and how it applies to Wikipedia editing, and intend to follow this rule in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 13:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Please don't post a new unblock request each time. Your answer is incorrect.— Diannaa (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa Can you provide a link to a Wikipedia policy page on public domain, prose, copyright, and fair use, or a part of an article? I thought you didn't have to worry about copyright infringement if something is in the public domain, for example, if one of Agatha Christy's novels copyright has expired 100 years later. ScientistBuilder (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have said: Your statement is correct, but it does not answer the question, which was about fair use. The question is, in what circumstances might you use someone's copyright prose as fair use, rather than writing your own?— Diannaa (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Fair use applies to using copyright material for research and scholarship. Fair use is a legal way to put copyrighted prose in a Wikipedia article with a citation. @Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

That's true. Could you give me an example of why or when you would use fair use prose?— Diannaa (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I could put a quote by C.S. Lewis from one of his books which the copyright has not expired in the article about C.S. Lewis.@Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Diannaa I would like to use the Wikipedia library to find a book when I am unblocked. I am looking for a book Computational Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica ® 1st Edition by Sriram Pemmaraju, and Steven Skiena. The book was published on December 8, 2003 by Cambridge University Press and I have access to the Cambridge database. I would like to request access to the Wikipedia library for combinatorics research. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

(edit conflict) That's a pretty good answer. I am going to unblock now, but I just want to point out that earlier you said Wikipedia's license is "No Derivatives" and that is incorrect. Please read up on this so you understand what derivative works are.

Please note I will be monitoring all your contributions for the foreseeable future for any violations of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Di (they-them) Please unblock me so I can access Wikipedia Library. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

I meant to write @Diannaa.

I meant that Wikimedia Commons does not accept Creative Commons No Derivatives, not that Wikipedia's license is No Derivatives. I read this in Wikipedia The Missing Manual by John Broughton by Oreilly Media in 2008 or WP:MAN. I was stating I think No Derivative works should be allowed because if you are satisfied with your art work and you think its perfect you don't people doing something to it. I did not mean that Wikipedia has a No Derivatives license. I did mean that No Derivatives and Wikimedia Commons are incompatible. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Lollipop chart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Is Origin Lab Pro's lollipop plot blog post at https://blog.originlab.com/lollipop-plot a reliable source I could add to the article? ScientistBuilder (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Atomic clock into Optical clock. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Would the talk page be a good idea for attribution? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I added attribution on Optical Clock talk page ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Posting on the talk page is optional; saying where you got your content in an edit summary is required. If you forget to do it, you can do it in a lter edit summary. — Diannaa (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

I posted an edit summary ScientistBuilder (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YMCA May Building (Huntington, West Virginia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YMCA May Building (Huntington, West Virginia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi WalkingRadiance, I have participated at the AFD a bit; i hope you don't mind my calling the current article by a negative term (because it doesn't much develop the history of the Huntington YMCA building(s) and the organization. I'd like to see the article kept and developed more, with expansion to cover the whole topic of Huntington YMCA, the organization and its programs and all of its history and buildings. You stated at the AFD that "I have two secondary sources"...Could you please post more at the AFD about what those are? It is okay if they are not online documents. If you have electronic versions of them, though, could you possible please email them to me (at my Userpage, select "Email this user"), so I could try to work with them? Either way, thank you for your contributipons. Sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail^[✉️] 15:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to Large scale capacitated arc routing probem has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your only warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

I saw your message in one of my talk page archives. That's not a good place to hold a conversation. I can check your draft, if you will provide me with a wikilink. I don't know where your draft is located, or specifically what you want me to check it against. Please answer on this page (not in my archives). Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of Graph Theory Problems and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 26#List of Graph Theory Problems until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pichpich (talk) 22:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Here are a few graph theory topics: traveling salesman problem symmetric with triangle inequality, asymmetric traveling salesman, arc routing problems including chinese postman problem, directed chinese postman problem, mixed chinese postman problem, windy postman problem, rural postman problem, capacitated arc routing problem, downhill plowing with precedence, and maximal cardinality or minimum weight matchings and coverings and cliques. WalkingRadiance (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Please look at this edit and some of my other recent edits of pages you've worked on. You're using too many capital letters. WP:MOS forbids capitalizing an initial letter merely because it's part of a section title or an article title. Generally the first letter of the title is capital except when there is some special reason for lower case, and other initials are in lower case except when there is a reason to use a capital, such as the name of a person or a place, etc. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

I will stop capitalizing the words except for the first word. WalkingRadiance (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, WalkingRadiance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of physical quanties and units, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, WalkingRadiance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lollipop chart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, WalkingRadiance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of physical quanties and units".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi WalkingRadiance,

No hard feelings, but I've reverted your recent edit on the multivariate Poisson distribution -- the reason for this being that there is no such thing as a multivariate Poisson distribution. Any random vector whose components are Poisson-distributed could be called a "multivariate Poisson distribution", and the source you cited talks about multivariate generalizations of the Poisson distribution. In what you wrote and in the graphs you added, it is not clear what generalization is considered. If you are simply talking about a tuple of independent Poisson distributions, then that is not an interesting generalization. I can see you put some work in your edit and that is why I am writing this message, but in its current form the edit does not add anything valuable to the article and that is why I am reverting it.

Best, Malparti (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

For more details on Mathematica's implementation of a multivariate form of the Poisson distribution, see the Background and context section of the documentation for MultivariatePoissonDistribution. WalkingRadiance (talk) 23:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)