User talk:Seamlessly

Hi Seamlessly! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

If you have any questions at all, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I notice that you have added several articles to the (currently) non-existent Category:Fatigue. Per WP:CATREDLINK "A page should never be left with a non-existent (redlinked) category on it." Please create the category if you think it is worth having. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Fatigue indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of system quality attributes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elasticity and Familiarity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello Seamlessly! Your additions to Kenneth C. Griffin have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johnson & Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, in this edit to Human rights violations against Palestinians by Israel you use {{sfn|Amnesty International|2023}} and {{sfn|Lowenstein|2024}}. Unfortunately neither source is listed. This means that nobody can look up the references, and also the article is added to Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could supply the missing sources it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 10:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States v. Russell (2025), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Customs and Border Protection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

This edit was cut-and-paste from this source. (Separately, the content is a better fit in a different article, about the legality of the boat strikes.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

1. This is also cut-and-paste. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Diannaa I see a copyright notice from you (above) on 10 March 2025; I don't have time to follow up; Seamlessly has numerous contribs that need to be checked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

PS, if you think it needs revdel, I had copied the content of the first edit before I realized it was cut-and-paste (now removed). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:00, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

I have done revision deletion on the first example and your edit. The other one is mostly quotations. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Diannaa I gave the wrong diff in the second ... and don't have time now to go back and find the one I missed ... sorry :( Thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Seamlessly. Thank you for your work on Public Law 109-148. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic policy of the second Trump administration, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so muck for tracking down the citation(s) for the proclamation on the fake electors on the executive clemency page! That is a fantastic piece of work, well done!!! Desertfiend (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Seamlessly. Thank you for your work on Abouammo v. United States. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add secondary sources about the coverage of this case. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:51, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Seamlessly. Thank you for your work on Urias-Orellana v. Bondi. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add secondary sources showing coverage of the case. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:54, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domestic policy of the second Trump administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Seemlessly; It looks like you made a nice edit to bring more cases into the Trump article about this; do you have a currently tally of how many cases are currently listed there? My understanding from the lede in the main Trump biography is that it might be over 500 cases filed? How many are covered in law cases article about him which you just edited earlier today? ErnestKrause (talk) 21:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi,
Using find "-cv-" returns almost 400 matches on Legal affairs of the second Trump presidency. Different sources have different numbers (see Legal affairs of the second Trump presidency#Tracking the cases). Seamlessly (talk) 08:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, there are a lot of form letters that can be used to inform editors of issues with their editing. I prefer the personal touch, so I’m just going to very plainly say, please don’t do anything like this or anything approaching that level of editorializing again. This is a neutral pov encyclopedia, and users get indefinitely banned for disruptive edits all the time.

I can easily see how one could draw a connection between the famous “First they came for” poem and modern instances of seeming repression, but to be frank, Wikipedia does not care what you (or I) think. Wikipedia only cares about what reliable, independent sources think. Mikewem (talk) 21:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Steven Engel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:58, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heritage American, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage American until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laken Riley Act, a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Please be careful when making edits like your recent AfD comment that could be interpreted as reductio ad Hitlerum. Just a couple weeks ago another editor took offense at something similar. Jews, Nazis, and Trump are each pretty contentious, and downright combustible when mixed as in this edit. Uhoj (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democracy International was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 17 February 2026 (UTC)