User talk:SecretSpectre

Hello,

I've asked a question about a tag you placed in Talk:Squeaky_Fromme.

Greetings, Anonymous44 (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Gather your troops. It's time to turn the TCM page around. TommyKirchhoff (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't want to take part in an edit war. I made all the points I wanted already in the previous discussion. SecretSpectre (talk) 11:14, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shigatoxigenic and verotoxigenic Escherichia coli, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting the removal of the LLM template added in February 2026 [Lerato Shadi]. I wrote this content based on the sources cited in the 'External links' and 'References' sections, the text is original work. To address any concerns regarding the 'encyclopedic tone' or sourcing:

- The phrasing is my own and not a product of a generative model.

- All claims are supported by the provided citations. If there is a specific passage that appears “hallucinated” or lacks a clear inline citation, please point it out so I can fix it immediately.

- I have attempted to follow Wikipedia’s Manual of Style

I am committed to the quality of this article. Could you please specify which sections triggered the flag, or remove the template if no specific issues are found? Thanks.

dewilprj (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reaching out,

I placed the tag on the page because of the extremely dense essay-like tone in the lead and "Artistic theme" sections. There are also phrases such as "Shadi’s work challenges Western notions of history by making visible what is routinely overlooked and by centering—not merely including—the marginalised body within narrative experience." which sound AI generated. SecretSpectre (talk) 20:29, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for the quick reply, I hear you.

I’ve revised the lead and relevant sections, while keeping standard art-language where it’s supported by the relevant sources.

Could you please take another look? If anything still reads non-encyclopedic, point me to the specific lines and I’ll fix them; otherwise, I’d appreciate removal of the LLM template.

All my best. dewilprj (talk) 10:04, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for improving the article, I have removed the tag. SecretSpectre (talk) 23:05, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated! Thanks for the guidance and for removing the template, all my best dewilprj (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for raising this concern, SecretSpectre. I am requesting for removal of LLM template on airborne infection control in TB page. I want to clarify that the material I contributed was not blindly generated — all facts were carefully cross‑checked against reliable sources, and every citation was personally verified before inclusion. I can assure you that no hallucinated content or fictitious references were added. The statements are factually accurate, and the citations have been manually confirmed to correspond to the sources cited.

If you notice any specific point that seems problematic, I’d be glad to review it again with you to ensure the article maintains the highest standards of accuracy and reliability. Staracademic21 (talk) 02:13, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I've removed the tag since the references look in order. It's getting merged anyway. SecretSpectre (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello SecretSpectre⁠, Thanks for your message and for reviewing my changes. I understand your concerns regarding the use of AI-generated content on Wikipedia. However, I would like to clarify that all the content I provided regarding Md. Zahidul Islam Dulu has been based on verifiable news sources such as Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS News) and Ajker Patrika. I did not use any AI-generated content or chatbots to write this article. All the content I provided, such as the results of the elections and the constituencies, are based on verifiable sources such as the media. I provided sources for all the content I provided. I did not use any content from Wikipedia as a source. If you find any content that you believe to be unverified or false, I will be happy to review it and make the necessary changes. I want to ensure that the content provided on this page meets the standards set by Wikipedia. Thanks again for your vigilance. RifatHasan25 (talk) 01:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Please note WP:MEATBOT "Human editors are expected to pay attention to the edits they make, and ensure that they do not sacrifice quality in the pursuit of speed or quantity." You have written over two dozen articles about politicians in under two hours, all of which exhibit clear signs of AI writing. SecretSpectre (talk) 02:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)