User talk:ShadZ01
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome
Hello, ShadZ01, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, I'm Kkj11210. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Timeline of Napoleonic Wars because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! KJ Discuss? 22:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Timeline of the Napoleonic era has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Timeline of the Napoleonic era was changed by ShadowNinja1080 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880965 on 2014-10-16T01:03:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Timeline of the Napoleonic era
Please see my message to you on Talk:Timeline of the Napoleonic era -- PBS (talk) 21:34, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Please answer (just below the posting) the issues I raised in my posting to Talk:Timeline of the Napoleonic era#More edits in October -- PBS (talk) 11:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Revert
Today, I reverted your edit on Timeline of the Napoleonic era. The main reason for that is that your edits were completely unsourced. Wikipedia, as encyclopaedia, required reliable sources. I hope that you have time to read the article WP:RS so that you know what is needed.
I also noticed that with your edits you re-created a few links to disambiguation pages. For example, you linked to the Siege of Danzig. But when you follow that link, you will see that there are several events with that name. That is why the link should be Siege of Danzig (1813), to let it point to the right siege.
Good luck. The Banner talk 15:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Russian intervention in Syria

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Russian intervention in Syria, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Russian intervention in the Syrian Civil War. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
War in Donbass
Please don't try to WP:POV-push content as you did here. The issue has been thoroughly discussed on multiple articles surrounding events in Ukraine. In the simplest of terms, this is not a 'claim by Ukraine': it has been established irrefutably internationally. Essentially, all you appear to be trying to accomplish is making a globally widely reported recognition of RF involvement appear to be an insignificant and dubious claim by Ukraine. While I am going to assume that this was a good faith error on your behalf rather than wishing to intentionally mislead readers, it casts doubts as to your ability to contribute productively. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Battle of Ilovaisk. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
June 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Russian Americans, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Golden Warrior Monument

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Golden Warrior Monument, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fuortu (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Statue of the Golden Warrior

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Statue of the Golden Warrior. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Golden Warrior Monument. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Golden Warrior Monument – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fuortu (talk) 15:36, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Park of 28 Panfilov Guardsmen, Almaty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Park of 28 Panfilov Guardsmen, Almaty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ayub407talk 09:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Almaty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascension Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
Hello ShadowNinja1080. All or some of your addition(s) to Golden Warrior Monument has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
Your addition to Ramstore Bridge has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing.
— Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:RR style
Template:RR style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 01:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:KTZ style
Template:KTZ style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 01:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Republic Square, Almaty

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Republic Square, Almaty requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pyrusca (talk) 00:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 2 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Republic Square, Almaty page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Republic Square, Almaty
Speedy deletion nomination of Kok-Tobe Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kok-Tobe Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Auezov Kazakh Drama Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Esentai Tower
- added a link pointing to Northern Lights
- Kok Tobe
- added a link pointing to Forest park
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Original Barnstar | |
| Hey man, you do good work in the area of Kazakhstan (I thought about giving you the Barnstar of Merit for that country but decided that I had no authority to do so), so here's a little something to let you know that somebody noticed. Vami_IV✠ 01:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC) |
- Hey thanks for the barnstar, but I was really hoping for having Barnstar of Merit for Kazakhstan. I'm a little disappointing because I want people to know what country I am really working for. I believe I deserve to have to other barnstar. I also believe that you have authority to give me the Barnstar for Kazakhstan since the person who's in charge or maintains the group is completely inactive. --Shadowzpaev (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Dinmukhamed Konayev a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. XXN, 20:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Possible adoption
Hey man, I wanted to ask you if I could possibly "adopt" you and show the ropes to Wikipedia - The Five Pillars, Policies and Guidelines, how to use citation templates and write articles - essentially, how to Wikipedia and not get your edits reverted and be credited for making them. Although, if you don't trust me, I would like to refer you to the Teahouse or the Adoption Center. --Vami_IV✠ 00:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sure! Shadowzpaev (talk) 00:58, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Shadowzpaev. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Park View Office Tower
Hello Shadowzpaev,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Park View Office Tower for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Park View Office Tower
Hello Shadowzpaev,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Park View Office Tower for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
January 2017
Hello, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Park View Office Tower for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Park View Office Tower is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park View Office Tower until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Talan Towers

The article Talan Towers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Zero credible sources. No claim to notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Mahmoud Magomedovich Sheikh-Ali
Hello, Shadowzpaev. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mahmoud Magomedovich Sheikh-Ali, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Office buildings in Astana

A tag has been placed on Category:Office buildings in Astana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 04:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azat Peruashev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazakh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of national founders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazakh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
August 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mark Dice. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 12:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Kalkaman (Almaty Metro)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Shadowzpaev, thanks for creating Kalkaman (Almaty Metro)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources; all articles need sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Barnstar of European Merit
| The Barnstar of European Merit | ||
| I, Vami_IV, award the Barnstar of European Merit to Shadowzpaev for their participation in the European 10,000 Challenge, no matter how minor. It's the thought that counts, and I appreciate your work. –Vami_IV✠ 02:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
| this WikiAward was given to Shadowzpaev by Vami_IV✠ on 02:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC) |
Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Shadowzpaev. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sources
Hello, can you please add your sources to Zapadny Bus Station (Almaty Metro)? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at David Hogg, you may be blocked from editing. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qasym Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uzbek Khanate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Buryndyq Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Khan
- Kerei Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Khan
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Moving articles without discussion
"Correct transliteration from Kazakh" is not in itself a sufficient reason to move an article, particularly when transliteration systems vary over time. Typically wikipedia articles are not moved until the newly favoured spelling becomes the wp:Commonname. If any move is anything other than an obvious typo, wp:Requested moves is the process to follow. At the very least some discussion at the article's talk page should be attempted. For these reasons I have reverted your moves of Lake Kopa, Nurly Zhol, Ak Orda Presidential Palace, Zhas Otan, Aqmola Region ... Batternut (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:UBX/Alt-right pepe
User:UBX/Alt-right pepe, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Alt-right pepe and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/Alt-right pepe during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 03:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:UBX/Alt-right flag
User:UBX/Alt-right flag, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Alt-right flag and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/Alt-right flag during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

ShadZ01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I understand the mistakes and consequences I may have caused onto this and I wish not to ever do it again. I will try to follow more rules precisely since I enjoy using this website to make articles and I still would want to continue it but doing it rightly. Shadowzpaev (talk) 20:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not eligible for unblock consideration here. Go make the request on your original account. There, you'll need to address your violations of WP:SOCK and WP:COPYRIGHT and your clear trolling. Given how recent your violations were, there's essentially no chance you'll be unblocked there, either. Your best hope, though it's faint given your behaviour, is to wait six months with zero edits then apply under WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
unblock?
I've read your unblock request, but cannot decline it using my not-admin account. One problem is the request is quite vague and nebulous. You would need to state in your own words how things went pear shaped and what you would do to fly right. That would be for ordinary circumstances, and your circumstances are not ordinary. You've been blocked for WP:sockpuppetry. (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Igor1383) You should probably address all issues on the original account. However, you should read about sockpuppetry first. Dlohcierekim's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 05:47, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

ShadZ01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #21804 was submitted on Jun 12, 2018 18:13:02. This review is now closed.





