User talk:ShantaeFan123
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 2023
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cars (video game), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, just glad you at least gave a reason why you removed it and looked at my source unlike other people ShantaeFan123 (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
January 2024
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Asterix at the Olympic Games (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please be aware of WP:USERG as well. We can't be using things like gaming forums/message boards as sources either. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 14:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for telling me this ShantaeFan123 (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
May 2024
Hi ShantaeFan123! Two things: first, it's unnecessary to add wikilinks to years. See WP:YEARLINK. Assume the general reader knows what is meant by 1992. And the article on 1992 is about that year in general, it's an irrelevant link for people wanting to know more about the most recent Tom & Jerry film. Second, your edit summary. Critical human, why are you here? no offense but I can understand you like this movie very much, sure I made tons of mistakes on Wikipedia and even some opposies but please don’t edit or even edit back the things you put that got removed or something like that, we don’t want the Admins doing things to your account if that’s how it even works, if you’re going to edit, at least try fixing typos or something like that
. I suppose you're talking to or about editor CriticallyThinking, but know that asking is "why are you here" comes off as uncivil. Also, don't compare their edit history and yours or tell them what to do. Assume good faith. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- sorry ShantaeFan123 (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
February 2025
Your recent edit to the page Shrek 5 contains an edit summary that appears to have triggered the edit filter. The summary may have contained inappropriate text, such as a highly repetitive character sequence, profanity, gibberish, or all caps. Please use appropriate edit summaries to tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. If your summary did not contain such text, please report it to the false positives page and remove this message. Thank you. NJZombie (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- if you mean the second thing with the quote on quotes that started with the W I said in the Revision history, that was just an example of what people were saying about the movie, the edit itself didn't contain anything inappropriate for the wiki, it was just a source since the MinionsFan1998 didn't link to one, so I did it for him, but still, my apologies if I did anything wrong, well, I guess you can say I did since I technically did use all caps, for 3 letters and profanity at the same time but still, it wasn't towards anyone, but sorry anyways ShantaeFan123 (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, everything in the edit summary following that you added a source, is what I'm referring to. Regardless of intent, it doesn't belong in the edit summary. NJZombie (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Well my apologies for saying that in the edit summary then, I will try not to use profanity again next time in the edit summary, even if it’s small or not towards someone ShantaeFan123 (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- I made no reference to profanity. I’m referring to the long summary mentioning Facebook posts and “be grateful it didn't end up like MegaMind 2.” None of that matters in an edit summary. Simply state what the change you made was and move on. NJZombie (talk) 16:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- oh, ok, my bad then, I had no idea ShantaeFan123 (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- I made no reference to profanity. I’m referring to the long summary mentioning Facebook posts and “be grateful it didn't end up like MegaMind 2.” None of that matters in an edit summary. Simply state what the change you made was and move on. NJZombie (talk) 16:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Well my apologies for saying that in the edit summary then, I will try not to use profanity again next time in the edit summary, even if it’s small or not towards someone ShantaeFan123 (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, everything in the edit summary following that you added a source, is what I'm referring to. Regardless of intent, it doesn't belong in the edit summary. NJZombie (talk) 05:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry Sorry about reporting you as disruptive. I should have attempted to communicate with you first. Best --SDudley (talk) 19:40, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
- It’s alright, I forgive you ShantaeFan123 (talk) 19:54, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)