User talk:Siagoddess
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Siagoddess's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Blocked as a sockpuppet

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Siagoddess (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Sincerely I do not have any connection with the accused user. I accept I created a draft on Patrick when he appeared on my TV one night but couldn't get it done Siagoddess (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beezy Gh/Archive. Yamla (talk) 00:01, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Siagoddess (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
I respectfully request a review of my indefinite block for alleged sockpuppetry related to User:Beezy Gh. My account, User:Siagoddess, was added to the suspected accounts list due to my creation of Draft:Patrick Amofah in 2023, which was previously deleted. However, aside from this, there is no history of coordination, behavioral similarities, or technical evidence linking my account to the other suspected accounts. I understand Wikipedia’s policies on sockpuppetry and take them seriously. If there are any concerns about my editing behavior, I am willing to clarify or address them. My intention has always been to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, and I kindly request reconsideration of my block. Thank you for your time and consideration. Siagoddess (talk) 5:15 am, Today (UTC−9)
Accept reason:
Per AGF, the socking allegation may have been in error, so an unblock is appropriate. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
@PhilKnight: While the deleted draft was clearly not acceptable, it differs substantially from the version that was created nearly a full year later, and it seems the CU evidence was inconclusive. While this user clearly has had trouble with writing in the tone and style expected in an encyclopedia, I'm not sure it is reasonable to conclude they are a sock or are otherwise acting on behalf of the other blocked users from that SPI. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 20:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: - if you want to unblock, I don't object. PhilKnight (talk) 21:04, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Beatrice Mensah-Tayui when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)
CS1 error on Alhaji Salamu Amadu
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Alhaji Salamu Amadu, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2026 (UTC)