User talk:Snowysusan

I received a message that the above submission is not acceptable. Is my understanding correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJillani (talk • contribs) 12:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Hi Snowysusan: Can you please tell me as to which portions require verification? AJillani (talk) 13:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC) Hi Snowysusan: You say that the article SPARC and Child Rights Society in Pakistan will also be rejected due to lack of verification. It remains unclear as to what kind of verification is required as almost all the information relates to the Society's history.AJillani (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Snowysusan: I have resubmitted article SPARC and Breastfeeding with a few citations. Can you pls tell me if I am on the right track?AJillani (talk) 13:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC) Subject of my article is...

− The issue bottle feeding caused by the marketing of infant formulas acted as a catalyst for SPARC’s establishment (SPARC was registered on December 17, 1992, in Islamabad, Pakistan, as Society for the Protection of the Rights of the Child).

− − IBFAN (International Baby Food Action Network), a worldwide coalition of citizen groups working for adopt and enforcement of legislations to give effect to the principles and aims of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (“the International Code”)^[1] , made SPARC a member and helped it in opposing the marketing of breastmilk substitutes.

− − In December 1985, one of SPARC's founding member, Mr Anees Jillani conducted a study for UNICEF concerning the implementation of the International Code.^[2] In February 1992, Mr Jillani was sent by UNICEF to attend an IBFAN Training Course on Implementing the International Code in Malaysia. From September 23 to October 3, 1992, IBFAN asked him to attend as a resource person its Training Course on Implementing the International Code in Antigua, Guatemala and then its Regional Training cum Workshop at Dhulikhel, Nepal, from January 27 to February 4, 1995. From September 6 to 8, 1983, he was invited by the WHO to attend an Informal Consultants Briefing on the International Code in Geneva, Switzerland.^[3]

− − In the midst of all these developments, Mr Jillani was asked by Unicef to draft a national legislation for implementation of the International Code which, which after undergoing several modifications and stiff resistance from the infant formula industry, eventually led to the enactment of the Protection of Breastfeeding and Young Child Nutrition Ordinance in October 1992.^[4] Subsequently, Unicef asked Mr Jillani to draft the Rules under the Ordinance which eventually were notified to come into force in February 2010.^[5]

thank you for your nice welcome! Memphisflash56 (talk) 10:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, thank you very much!

I really appreciate you taking your time to guide me through the submission process, these are my first contributions and I admit, I am a novice.

I have expanded it a bit and as you suggests, added several references, which are all independent. Just as a curiosity, you mention that the Italian Frascati Cannellino has 14 sources, but if you look carefully, they only the first two are real ones, the other 12 are references to a web site of food which they say can be coupled with Cannellino (and I doubt it), and has nothing to do with wine itself.

You are mentioning that the reader has to verify what is written, if you need any evidence that I have taken it from the sources, I can send you the reference and the material itself.

Thank you for supporting, if the article has reached a decent level, I will continue to improve it further and also resubmit the other pending article on Frascati DOCG.

Many thanks again

Mamilius (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, regarding the Frascati Cannellino submission, I sent you the above remarks after making changes, but havent heard from you since a week. When you have time, please have a revision, your comments are welcome!

Mamilius (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, first of all thank you for your welcome. And thanks for reviewing my article. As I'm new to Wikipedia and this is my first attempt of writing an article here I would be pleased to get some help from you. Could you please tell me what exactly I need to edit in my article. I've added references but I'm confused now (sorry) what else I must add/change so that you accept my article.

[] []

--Viv1112 (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Susi,

I submitted an article for review a few days ago and now get messages in my email that mean nothing to me. Stuff about joining Teahouse; last one was from you:

The Wikipedia page "User talk:Lauriebak" has been changed on 18 November 2012 by Snowysusan, with the edit summary: /* Welcome! */ new section

etc.

I really don't know what to do with these messages and I don't know the status of my article. I'm really not interested in editing or chatting at this time ... just want to get this article accepted.

Can you explain the process?

thanks LaurieLauriebak (talk) 20:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Snowysusan,

Thank you for your welcome and the pointers. Wikipedia is still a bit like a foreign language and will take me a little while to absorb all the info you have sent me. I will keep trying to improve my page on Penpont Brewery and hopefully learn as I go. Someone or some programme has managed to sort my references into the proper format and I am sincerely thankful for that!

Regards

Bobkat12--Bobkat12 (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Snowysusan, thank you for reviewing the article I recently put up for creation. The reason that you rejected the article is that it apparently read more like an ad to you than an encyclopedia entry. I am wondering what kind of information you would suggest adding to make it more appropriate.

Our references, I believe, are varied and independent. What sources would you prefer.

Thanks again,

--Zachrichardcb (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan

Please see my new updated page regarding 'SoccerStarz'. I have put in as many references as I can find at this time. As the brand is a fairly new product, there is not that many articles on the subject at the moment, however over time and with other contributors help I'm sure we can build this page up to be a very reliable and verifiable source of information. If there are any other specifics that require references, would you be kind enough to point them out to me.

Many Thanks

--BerbatovsFirstTouch (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

I understand and accept the reasoning behind declining the proposed Wikipedia article for "Rachael Kelsey Smith," a prominent feline activist and up and coming graphic design artist. However, I find Wikipedia definition of "notable" both loose and contradictory. For example, there is a very large page devoted solely to Kim Kardashian. Really? As a member of America for over 23 years, I fail to see how Kim Kardashian has contributed to society at all; and the fact that her page credits her as a "style icon" leads me to question the editing staff of Wikipedia as an entirety. Shame! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.193.52 (talk) 01:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan,

Thanks a lot for you feedback in relation to my article. You clearly pointed out that the article was turned down because it included copyrighted information. I would like to make improvements and amend this issue. I would highly appreciate it if you could point out which section within the text specifically has this copyrighted info? Following your response, I will continue to work on improving the submission.Thank you very Kindly.

Best Regards,

Studyinformant007Studyinformant007 (talk) 11:51, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan

I am resubmitting the article about Robbie Steinhouse that you declined on 21 Sept.

I have beefed up the paragraphs on the content of the books, and added some references.

I think that this author should be on Wikipedia because he has had three books published by a reputable publisher (Prentice Hall are part of Pearson).

Best wishes FabFred Fabfred (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan,

Thank you for your editing.

I understand your concerns that the article may read like an advertisement. However, the page only uses information that are in the public domain without any undesirable puffery.

I refer to the following approved law firm articles with similar content as the one that I created:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davies_Ward_Phillips_%26_Vineberg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cains_%28law_firm%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenwick_%26_West

Otherwise, I would be very grateful if you could let me know which particular sections I will need to change. I will make amendments accordingly and resubmit.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan.leung (talk • contribs) 11:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Good Day Snowysusan, please clarify how we need to prove notability for the page Nampak Limited. As mentioned the company is indeed one of the biggest companies in Africa and very notable. I did not include all the ref links as it would seem very spammy to add well over 500 links mentioning Nampak as a major company in Africa (thought the Bloomburg link would be enough). Please advise me of the best way to incorporate these links and I will do just that. The company is listed on List of companies traded on the JSE and many much smaller, less notable companies are listed. Any help from you to get this listing live would be appreciated.

I have many news stories showing the credibility of Nampak Nampak News By reditable Third Party News Source In SA

--Bryancasson (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Susan,

as I am (very) new at this I quite don't understand if my article is good to go or not. Is there anything else I should do, as I already re edited it after being rejected once? Thank you, Anne — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnneWilmont (talk • contribs) 13:31, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I have updated the Focal Point page to include further references for notability. It is not a new tool; it has been around over 10 years and has tens of thousands of users. The references I added were a link to an independent survey on LinkedIn that rated it highest amongst Product Management tools, a link to the most recent Gartner EA Magic Quadrant within which Focal Point and System Architect are listed in the Leaders quadrant -- in fact they are highest in "ability to execute" but Gartner does not allow any vendor to say a tool finished highest; you can only say are listed as Leaders. I also added a link to an integration with Computer Associates Planview, which is one of the most widely used project management tools in the industry. There is a page on IBM that lists customer stories but I don't know if this should be on the wikipedia page -- published by IBM but shows how many big companies are using this product successfully http://www-01.ibm.com/software/success/cssdb.nsf/softwareL2VW?OpenView&Count=10&RestrictToCategory=default_RationalFocalPoint&cty=en_us

Let me know if there is anything else that you need for this article to be published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louv (talk • contribs) 16:44, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan,

Thank you for your feedback. I have taken on board your comments and have made substantial edits to the article. I would be very grateful if you could let me know whether it meets your criteria and if not, what changes will need to be made.

Thank you for your time. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan.leung (talk • contribs) 05:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Please could you confirm my Ateronon submission is now ok? Thanks ~~meeahlo~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meeahlo (talk • contribs) 16:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

SusanGuthmannHenry (talk) 20:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)Hi, Snowysusan!

Thank you for being kind to a brand new contributor and looking at my article!

I think I've fixed it so that it is no longer blank but I am not sure.

Could you look and see if it's okay now?

Thanks so much! SusanGuthmannHenry (talk) 20:08, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan, I am having trouble finding secondary sources because I am writing about a company from the 80s before the internet was widely available. However, I have hard copy newspaper articles from news publications now debunk. How can I incorporate them into the article if they cannot be seen or verified by people online? Thank you ahead of time! Sincerely, Ashleyisfree.Ashleyisfree (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Snowysusan: Thank you for reviewing my submission so quickly. Can you explain what would be considered cite verifiable? I shared that the song Epistle To Dippy by Donovan refers to the Crystal Spectacles and that they are shown in the movie Imagine, about John Lennon. If I said how many minutes into the movie they are shown, would that make it verifiably cited? If not can you give me an example as to how something like that would be properly cited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas Duva (talk • contribs) 13:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks very much - think I've got that now! MeeahloMeeahlo (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Novemberflower (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Hello Snowysusan,

I have edited the Shane Stay page and I have completed the references. How do I resubmit for review?

Thank you Novemberflower

Novemberflower (talk) 04:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC) Hello Snowysusan,

I have edited the Shane Stay page and I have completed the references. How do I resubmit for review?

Thank you Novemberflower

Thank you for your recommendations for the Leatt-Brace entry! I've made your suggested changes and am resubmitting now. Raven2277 (talk) 15:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi - I'm writing about the article you declined on the 24th (concerning the Institute for Statistics Education). I think it meets all the criteria that you mention, except that the two sources (#1 and #3) that establish notability and independence are apparently not available online. Would it help if I sent those to you? Peter Bruce (Petercbruce) Petercbruce (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear Susan,

Thank you for very much for your feedback last week.

I haven't heard back from you yet after my follow-up email, but I have made further substantial edits to my article following your comments.

May I ask whether the article now meets your criteria and follows that of other similar articles? If so, may I ask what the process is now? Do you reverse the declined status? Or do I create a new article and start from scratch?

Otherwise, I would be grateful if you could inform me what further changes need to be made.

Logan.leung (talk) 02:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi SnowySusan,

Thank you for your feedback regarding my submission of the Neptune Society. You commented that the submission did not read neutral, but rather as a sales pitch. Can you please provide an example. My submission covers 4 distinct companies, and I made an effort to state only facts without showing preference to any one company.

Your feedback also stated that footnotes should related only to external sources. In this case, the references were from Business Week and the Houston Chronicle, not from company releases. So, what would you recommend?

Thanks, 107.192.218.226 (talk) 03:51, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan,

I think my article was declined again for references after I put serveral in. I referenced everything I used to write the article, can you explain to me what the issue(s) are?

Best, Mark — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJaundoo1 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, I notice you're adding clean-up templates to draft articles at AfC. I'm not sure this is a good idea, because these are not articles yet, therefore have plenty of opportunity for improvement before they're moved to article space (if ever). Clean-up templates will add these drafts to someone's work list too! It will be far better (you've been doing this anyway) to add a brief word of advice in the form of an afc comment. Hope that makes sense. All the best! Sionk (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Dear SnowySusan

I have made quite a few changes to the article on Murshidabad College of Engineering and Technology, after you rejected my submission mentioning the reason as "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia". I have tried to maintain neutrality.

Request you to kindly have a look when you can and let me know.

Thanks a lot for your help.

Regards, --Chiranjibmazumdar1 (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Snowysusan,

I appreciate your help getting the Poos Collection article formatted correctly. I still have much to learn about the Wiki system. So, does this mean it can now be added to the encyclopedia? If so, how do I do that/

Thanks for the editing on the Poos Collection! Lori Lori Triplett (talk) 15:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, Still awaiting feedback from you for the Focal Point page which I've added additional industry sources of information for notability, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IBM_Rational_Focal_Point — Preceding unsigned comment added by Louv (talk • contribs) 17:33, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I noticed you declined this for being a non-notable athlete. For the future, the article said they played for FCF Como which would make them notable. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You are one of four editors who inspected/declined Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Justin P. Wayoro for reasons other than blatant copyvio. This article was merely a bunch of text cobbled together from various sites. Step one in reviewing an article for creation should be to dump a string into google to see if it is a copyvio. If it is, the text should be immediately removed and an inspection of any images should be undertaken. In this case, the style of writing should have set of all sorts of copyvio alarm bells in your mind. Cheers, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Sue;

 I am Jorge Vytautas Daukantas , nephew of Teodoras Daukantas, Independent Republic of Lithuania Defense Minister ( 1924-1927).
Stephen Philbrick of Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia has allowed images of the Eastern European Lyceum images of Teodoras Daukantas to be uploaded to Google Images .   The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum  under USHMM Atchivist Rebecca Erbelding has approved a "Deed of Gift" of the Ceslovas Daukantas  collection to be placed  in the "Rescuing the Evidence" and Permanent Collections" Archives at the U.S.H.M.M.

 I could use your advice on how to upload an image of the Defense Minister and submit a Wikipedia page in his honor according to proper submisasion guidelines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zckjsrbn (talk • contribs) 20:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

Could you give me an example of what was referenced that cannot be verified for my submission that caused it to be declined? Granted I am writing about the business I personally started and run, so perhaps I am oblivious to certain things, but if you could give me examples I can fix them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngbunny (talk • contribs) 07:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I resubmitted an improved (I hope) Alan Riding article, but it seems to be stuck in resubmission limbo... any idea or advice? Thank you! Markmarkai (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review my article and point out inconsistencies within the article. I will certainly take the time to look over your tips and guidelines so my next article may be successfully published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.239.210.130 (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Open window7 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Zujua (talk) 06:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/HipHossip.com

I noticed your name at the top of this article so I thought I would contact you.

The woman behind this page is Kemi Olunloyo aka Wikicohen on Wikipedia.

I hope you reject this and throw it in Wikibin or the garbage. This is not her first time. She thinks she is famous.

Take care.

69.165.141.64 (talk) 03:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello SnowySusan,

I just resubmitted our article for GreenWaste REcovery and Zanker Road Resource Management. The article is a rewording of our Sustainabilty Report for 2012. I am waiting for a references list from our outreach department, but in the meantime I am hoping that you find our new submission more qualified for approval. There is much more content that shows why we are unique as a waste managment and recycling company, and how our regional company set the standard for waste diversion in California (We built the very first mechanical sortline in the United States. We will operate the largest, most technical and most sophisticated anaerobic digesting facility in the United States. Currently in the last phase of construction).

I want to put our best foot forward and do everthying we can to achive compliance of the rules that govern this amazing online source of infornmation. Just tell me what to do and I will conform.

Best and Warmest Regards,

Aaron James French — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZankerToughguy (talk • contribs) 17:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'm trying to delete my submission "Shortology" but i don't know how. Can you help me? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by H-57 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Snowysusan, Soccer For Peace was declined in October, and I revised in December. I resubmitted for review, but it has not been reviewed yet. Can you please advise? Thank you, gtn107 Gtn107 (talk) 11:46, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, just asking if I could resubmit the Wargame: AirLand Battle article? The submission has been declined twice, both because of references, but this time I'm sure that I added in proper referencing. When I try to re-resubmit the article, I cannot find the template above the content, so I decided to go to the history of the article and I readded the template. Is this allowed so I can resubmit the article? - Privatejfx141 (talk) 01:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan

I'm trying to pick up the threads of this piece, which you kindly looked at and tidied up in November. I'm not sure what to do with it now. Should I resubmit it? If so, how? Or does it need further work? I'd be very grateful for your help.

Thanks Fabfred (talk) 11:35, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jo_eliot this edit was submitted on 24.December with citations added, as suggested, but there has been no action! Jo eliot (talk) 22:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello,

I am re-visting a posting creation (The Crons Brand) that you had rejected last August with this comment.

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.

Yet some of the primary references for footnotes were from the NY Times, Pittsburgh Post Gazette, Wall Street Journal, CNBC and USAToday. Not sure why these references do not adquately evidence the subject's notability?

Thank you for the clarification and specific suggestion to improve the posting.

ComeReady (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Snowy Susan, Hope this finds you well. I am writing regarding the wikipedia:articles for creation page for Innosight. You declined our submission back in August 2012 noting that we didn't have notable sources. Since then, we've added many notable sources such as the WSJ, Businessweek, Forbes, etc. It appears as though I am unable to resubmit the page for review. Can you please provide any insight into why the page is rejected and/or if it has been successfully re-submitted? Thank you in advance and looking forward to your response! Best, Innovatewiki (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Susan,

Thank you for putting the article Walkodile" back to it's original version. I also tried to undo one of the edits. I hope I didn't make a mess of it and undo what you did!

I can't believe some people can be so mean spirited about an article that they would tae the time & choose to go into it and vandalise it. Does this happen often? Is there any way I can stop vandalism to the article?

Walkodile was meant to keep children safer - nothing more. We never intended to offend anyone.

p.a. If the article gets vandalised again is there a way for me to delete it. I don't know if I could stand having to check on it all the time for vandalism? It would be a shame but we'd have to consider it.Thanks.

Johnalex001 (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Susan,

I was curious to know what can be considered to be a notable reference, I recently posted an article for approval, I cited my sources correctly, but I'm curious to know whether or the not the sources/articles I cited are viable for a submission. Thank you for your time.

12.21.30.4 (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Jonathan Mosely

WikiProject Articles for creation Backlog Elimination Drive

WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Snowysusan, Sorry for digging up old bones (is that even an idiom?), but I noticed you welcomed a user which made only nonconstructive edits which violates WP policies. Please be reminded that welcomes of thanks should only be extended to editors which have made a constructive edit to Wikipedia. I am speaking as a friend who also like to welcome new users and have made similar mistakes, and I hope you can continue with your good work! Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 20:14, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, my user name is And1re2012, in October you assisted in formatting my article. I am trying to finish it so it can be published. I have given up on trying to load pictures, and now I am having a terrible time trying to remove a blue box around some of the text. If you have time, can you assist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by And1re2012 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

I am working on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nintendo_Nightmare and need some help revising it. I accidentally submitted it, so do not think it is complete. I can't cite anything other than the game as nothing else exists. I am also unaware how to create the outline boxes. Hopefully, you can take a look and at least finish the article. Who knows, maybe we'll make something that works, and if we do not then it can sit where it is and rot. At least, I will have finished a decent article.

99.140.198.164 (talk) 06:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Note: I forgot to log in tonight, but I should clear any potential sockpuppeting, and tell you that I am TheUnknownNinjaNN2. Yes, I havr read a little too far between the lines with that game, but trust me: I have reigned myself in tremendously. If I did anything with that game: it would be a totally different game! I would have to triple the final version to guide someone throug my "deductions". Just to give an example, I tried making the leaders of the Shroobs brothers (the NN leader and Fawful) I then made the Twibug the Dark Star after losing cotrol and going 'supernova' (what else would you call it). Then, I made the Dark Star a Shroob teraforming device built by Fawful (and lost), because the moon in Majora's Mask ate their planet, and the original Shroob sisters. See how off-target I got! I predict 12 parts (or the equivalent of 6 NNs) just to finish the story!

I will now quit editing this, before I bore you with too many extra details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.198.164 (talk) 06:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

You were the last one to review my submission back in October. I removed extraneous information to keep things direct. Could you take a look again? For the life of me I cannot find where to resubmit.

Thanks, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngbunny (talk • contribs) 03:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I made some edits to my entry based on your comments. I also added a few references to make the entry more relevant:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Byrdsmaniac/sandbox

Please take a look at it and let me know if there is anything else I should add to it to make it more notable and publishable.

Thanks. Byrdsmaniac (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)