User talk:SocDoneLeft

Thanks for uploading File:Obama Is No Socialist But We Are Banner Democratic Socialists of America DSA 2009.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Socialist Party USA, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Ashik Siddique 2025-01-18 People's March.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Whpq, thanks for your edit! You are correct. I did not realize that NFCC 1 excludes "could be created" subjects like living people. SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Read through a few of your drafts and they're looking great! Keep up the good work! Pourlevivant (talk) 19:35, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Pourlevivant Thank you! Any draft(s) in particular? And thank you for your work on the Green electeds page. SocDoneLeft (talk) 21:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

DSA history! Pourlevivant (talk) 03:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Working Families Party, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Davis was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

I saw you previously had worked on the RCA article, I have been reworking the article at Revolutionary Communists of America and could use your help. In order to give the article the best chance at survival we need to stick to as many secondary sources as possible and only utilize primary sources where absolutely necessary. Thanks! skarz (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi skarz: RCA was AFD'd before for lack of WP:RS. I think the current article would suffer the same fate.

But I think the current draft at Draft:Revolutionary Communists of America fulfils WP:N. Ideally we would move that draft over the current article, not just copy its code, so that author history is preserved. SocDoneLeft (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I have revised the draft to address the concerns about AI-style writing and over-attribution. I would appreciate it if you could take another look when convenient. Thank you for the feedback. ~2026-14296-17 (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the feedback. The references have been updated with publication dates, authors were added where available, and categories have been included. Thank you so much for your attention, and for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-14515-38 (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @~2026-14296-17: See Zana Gümüş! Please make any improvements you'd like. SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your suggestion on Draft:Traffic signal operation in New South Wales. I've added categories and a See Also section - it is ready for re-review. Jakecopp (talk) 22:56, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi: Accepted! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I wrote the article on Queer Armorer, and I am unaware of how to change the name of the article after, if I understood you correctly you said that I should reach out to you about that? ~2026-85045-4 (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, renaming now! SocDoneLeft (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

G'day SocDoneLeft!

I've gone and checked every listed reference to add authors where they were previously left out. From what I could find, there were only two specific authors mentioned (technically it's actually the same dude but I've just rewritten it exactly how it's styled as per the reference), the others not listing a specific person.

Hope this helps! Thanks for the support and tips!

1geel0ng1 1geel0ng1 (talk) 21:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

G'day, accepted! :) SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:45, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your previous feedback on my Draft. I have revised the article to address the concerns you mentioned . I removed unsupported claims, fixed grammar issues, and replaced several primary sources with independent news references.

If you have time, I would really appreciate it if you could take another look at the draft. Thank you again for your guidance.

Best regards. Hossain Ryhan (talk) 18:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Hossain Ryhan: I have replied! SocDoneLeft (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback that you provided. I made an effort to revise and edit in line with your suggestions. This is my first one so I thought I would write about a topic I was familiar with. I also removed the LLM suggested language. Please look at the draft and let me know if I am closer to a publishable article. NikkiAllen99 (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi @NikkiAllen99: The draft is much improved! I think it's 95% ready. I added two comments. SocDoneLeft (talk) 05:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the submission.

I have attempted to align the draft with Wikipedia's guidance by significantly shortening the article, removing promotional language, and limiting references to independent published sources where available.

The current version only includes information that can be supported by third-party coverage and avoids internal or self-published material. My intention was to present a minimal, neutral overview rather than a comprehensive biography.

In addition, I have added the required paid/connected contributor disclosure on my user page to follow the instructions previously provided.

If possible, I would appreciate any specific guidance on which sections or statements still appear promotional, or what type of additional sourcing would help the draft better meet Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality standards.

Thank you again for your time reviewing the submission. ShalhoubM (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arlington was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi SocDoneLeft. Thank you for your work on Los Angeles Democratic Socialists of America. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)