User talk:Soimuldacic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cube (software company) has been accepted

Cube (software company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Suitskvarts (talk) 14:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Cube (software company) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cube (software company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cube (software company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

November 2025

Information icon

Hello Soimuldacic. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Soimuldacic. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Soimuldacic|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. asilvering (talk) 05:44, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello asilvering.
My edits are not paid for, I just create or expand articles when I have free time. I thought I am complying with the policies as much as possible, always providing sources and writing in neutral tone. All the topics that I contributed seem notable per General Notability Guideline and other more topic-specific ones. If there are any problems with my editing, let's discuss, I will be sure to incorporate your advice into my editing!
Soimuldacic (talk) 15:22, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
What got you interested in writing about Cube (software company)? -- asilvering (talk) 20:36, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
I was checking out Forbes "Best Startups to Work At" list (https://www.forbes.com/lists/americas-best-startup-employers/)
Soimuldacic (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polaris Spaceplanes (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CharlieMehta was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Charlie (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Soimuldacic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Charlie (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horovod (machine learning), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Docker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ  Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bacula Systems SA (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
To meet Wikipedia's strict inclusion requirements for companies, we require sources that provide deep and significant coverage and are strictly independent of the company itself. Coverage in industry publications is also given more limited weight than coverage in mainstream sources. At this stage I don't see sources that meet each of those criteria in your draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 10:28, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bacula Systems SA (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I don't think that the 3 sources meet Wikipedia's inclusion requirements.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 15:39, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI