User talk:SpacemanSpiff/Archive 1

Hello, SpacemanSpiff. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

—Vensatry _(ping) 16:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Business India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hello, SpacemanSpiff. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Josu4u (talk) 06:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, SpacemanSpiff. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

sir namaskar very well you said this page made by banned or blocked user so you deleted the page but i think this creative man must be on Wikipedia I think you will also APPRECIATE the work of an Indian writer who is doing amazing work in the field of Mirror Image Writing.

Rest On You A Wikipedia follower and Reader.

Hi, I recently saw u have deleted the page Zebronics(company) giving reason as created by blocked user but the page was created before the users where blocked algo the username mentioned shuslience never involved in the edits so kindly restore the page or provide valuable reason |}

Hello, looks like the content uploader 'Prabhatmishra1985' (who has been blocked earlier) is running a propagandist agenda and presenting mostly hoax and over exaggerated facts. the user 'Prabhatmishra1985' has strangely added the name Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha in the FIRST place of the national 'List of Rajputs'- 'Politicians of India'. He has removed much much important historic,political and constitutional personalities of India belonging to Rajput Caste and inserted Thakur Yugal Kishore Sinha at the TOP of list who was only a one time MP.While Prominent Rajput icons and statesmen of India like Bhairon Singh Shekhawat,Anugrah Narayan Sinha,Arjun Singh, Dinesh Singh, Digvijay Singh,S.N. Sinha; who have been Vice-President,Chief Ministers,central ministers and Governors many times are missing! If Thakur Yugal Kishore Sinha's wife Ram Dulari Sinha (Who may be included as she held post of a Governor in her final years) is included then why not other Rajputs of India who have also held the office of Governor of several states and some who became Governors & CMs many times?. There are dozens of prominent Rajputs who have been MPs and members of Constituent Assembly of India that made India a republic and there are some who even have been CMs, Governors and central ministers after being MPs,then how come only Thakur Yugal Kishore Sinha who doesn't qualify to be placed at the 'Top' is allowed there? Kindly ensure only content backed by realistic sources and genuine importance are uploaded.Please check and include these genuinely important national Rajput icons of India like Karan Singh,Anugrah Narayan Sinha,Arjun Singh,Digvijay Singh,Bhism Narayan Singh,Pratibha Patil,Rajnath Singh,Satyendra Narayan Singh,Radhamohan Singh;some of whom have been iconic freedom fighters,members of India's constitution making assembly, some who had been President of India and some even today are holding highest offices in India.

Archives

2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Other: 1

The user removed the main image over at the Adi Parashakti article even though it is related to the article and when the users edits were reverted by me, The user went ahead and reverted my revert of her removing the said image.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adi_Parashakti&action=history&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop

Check it out, I’ve even messaged the user on their talk page (link below) and haven’t received any reply. The user also has a complaint from another wikipedia due to arbitrarily changing colours for use in TV articles. It shows the user is incapable of following basic wiki etiquettes and hasn’t bothered to read Wikipedia rules, Just goes on to edit articles at their mere will.

Take a look at the user’s talk page

User talk:RadhikaSharma444

Hoping you can take some action against the said user. Thank you for your time.

PLease reply man i need your help.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

@SpacemanSpidd,

Give me correct reason for the same, I am not promoting these articles. just explaining how Yogesh dube help need people.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemantrj18 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

• You've been doing the same promotion multiple times, even after it gets deleted and informed nicely. If you can't understand that then you shouldn't be editing an encyclopaedia, you should be writing a blog. —SpacemanSpiff 02:31, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

May i know why did you removed the contents to the subject line.

It was genuine and authentic contents. All notable people links are already present in wikipedia.

Why would there be controversies by adding notable people name of Kushwaha Surname. There are many other surname which has notable people and published without any issues such as Pathak,gupta,shukla,verma, thripathi then whats problem to add notable people name for kushwaha surname.

The articles on Tamilnadu people Maridhas Malaichamy, H. Raja are too biased and on written with political motive. Those references and citations are also not valid and from notable sites. Please look into these. All such things are continuesly made by one edittor. Please look into it.