User talk:Sphilbrick

Hello - how can I correctly add my edits without copyright issue?

Hello, you recently reverted edits I'd made to the Genesis Foundation page because of this link: https://genesisfoundation.org.uk/news/the-royal-court-theatre-and-genesis-foundation-announce-multi-year-partnership-to-support-new-play-development/

If I remove this link can I re add the edits? TheChadderz (talk) 10:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

There were two problems.

The first, (and the reason I reverted your edit) is that you copied and pasted material from this site. That material is subject to full copyright. It is important that you write in your own words with some exceptions, such as quoted material. (While quotes are an exception they ought to be a relevant use of quotes and I don't see that applying this case).

The second issue is that substantive edits that add new information ought to be supported by a citation to the source.

Did you written it in your own words and failed to add the citation it is unlikely your edit would've been reverted — some editor would have simply dropped in a template pointing out the need for a citation, and adding the citation would cure the problem. (In relatively rare situations, which don't apply in the situation, if the added material is highly contentious, it might be removed rather than simply requesting a citation).

Let me know if you need more information. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays

		Hi Sphilbrick Season's Greetings and all the best for 2026
		Wherever you are and whatever you believe in (or don't), reach out for peace on this little planet of ours! HAPPY HOLIDAYS 🥳 Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:12, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks and happy to see you posting. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:35, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:19, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks!! and happy holidays to you as well. Phil S Philbrick(Talk) 17:06, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Women in Red - January 2026

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

RD1

Hello! On Religion Communicators Council, there's a few different revisions that were marked for RD1, but it looks like you deleted only one of them. I just wanted to make you aware in case that was accidental. Thank you :) --tony 17:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

It was accidental. I deleted the one item that popped up in Copy Patrol and after I deleted it I saw that there was an RD one request. It didn't look at it closely I just thought I had taken care of it. I'll go back and fix it S Philbrick(Talk) 22:36, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

While, what a mess, complicated by the fact that some of copyvio additions had negative byte counts, presumably because the poster added some offending material but removed even more so the reversion actually counted as a byte increase.

I think I got all the one you listed plus there's been one more since then. S Philbrick(Talk) 22:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! tony 23:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

I have another for you on the talk page of the article you just did :) tony 18:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Yikes, done. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! tony 19:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

• Epicgenius
• Left guide
• LEvalyn
• MPGuy2824
• The4lines
• Yue

Fathoms Below

• BaronLarf
• Firefly
• kelapstick
• Opabinia regalis
• Pbsouthwood
• Sethant
• UtherSRG
• Whouk

CheckUser changes

• Giraffer
• HouseBlaster
• SilverLocust

• Liz
• Worm That Turned
• Z1720

Oversight changes

• Asilvering
• Giraffer
• Girth Summit
• Guerillero
• HouseBlaster
• Izno
• SilverLocust

• Liz
• Worm That Turned
• Z1720

Guideline and policy news

• All general sanctions imposed by the community may now be enforced at the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (WP:AE) as a result of a recent RfC.
• Due to the result of a recent RFC, the administrator recall process is amended to extend the deadline for a re-request for adminship to 30 days or the next administrator election, whichever is later.
• Changes to the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy's disclosure rules include broadening the consecutive-blocks exception to cover all admin actions and removing the requirement to revision-delete permissible disclosures once they become unnecessary (instead requiring only their removal). See WP:TAIVDISCLOSE for more information.

Arbitration

• Following the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Asilvering, Girth Summit, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, HouseBlaster, Izno, Sdrqaz, SilverLocust.
• The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been suspended.

Re:Recent edit reversion

Hi! Could you please elaborate? Was it because of the title made by the citation creator tool? --MemicznyJanusz (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

The content appeared to be all in Hebrew. Was that your intention? S Philbrick(Talk) 21:35, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Rajah Colambu

Good day, I unfortunately could not find a link to the article in question since it has already been deleted and my attempts at searching it would only give me a redlink page (Creating Rajah Colambu - Wikipedia).

I sincerely appreciate your evident efforts in maintaining proper quality control for the articles, and upon reading about the proper guidelines, I must admit that I was indeed in the wrong. I was unaware that the Article I directly quoted from (Blood Compact 500 Years Ago - 2021 Quincentennial Commemorations in the Philippines) was not under public domain, however that was the only part that I believed was problematic. Is there a way for me to recover the said article and have it edited out? Or can I just make a new article with the same title and similar contents?

Hoping for your reply, best wishes! Lizard012020 (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

I temporarily undeleted it so you can recover the nonproblematic material which is only two sentences.

If you do not use an external editor to compose anything more than a couple of words, I urge you to rethink your approach, so you don't need to plead for material to be undeleted so you can access it.

Please copy elsewhere the material that you want to save. S Philbrick(Talk) 19:25, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 72

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 72, November–December 2025

• Renewed partnerships
• Spotlight: Strengthening Wikimedia Collaborations with and for Open Science

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:43, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User:Sphilbrick and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Regarding another user

I've noticed that the user @Tragedy-91 has engaged in, solely, articles regarding mass murder, serial killings, or media centered around either. I don't know if theres any sort of policy that is ever employed to potentially reach out or help, but i'm worried for our fellow editor's mental health. That is all. Stiltedlibrary (talk) 01:15, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I hope you will reach out to someone else about this issue. For various reasons my recent Wikipedia involvement is copyvio related and not much else. I occasionally try to read AN and ANI just to keep on top of what's going on but I don't have the bandwidth to address your concern. S Philbrick(Talk) 01:36, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I apologize. I only reached out to you because I noticed your contribution on his talk page. I don't mean to seem ignorant and whatnot. Thank you for the advice. If I may, do you know who might be able to follow up on such an issue, or is this something outside the realm of Wikipedia entirely? Stiltedlibrary (talk) 01:39, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Its just something i am interested in. I do NOT idolize people who commit crimes of such it is ONLY an Interest. No mental health problems involved with this. Just needed to Clarify Tragedy-91 (talk) 02:37, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

It was reasonable for you to reach out to me because you noticed I posted to that editors talk page. However, as I mentioned, most of my current editing relates to issues involving copyright. I saw an edit with a copyright concern, and I went to the editors talk page to raise that concern. In many cases I would simply note the concern but in the case of an editor whose talk page is empty, it is standard practice to issue a welcoming post which I did and you noticed. You won't notice the post I made about the copyright issue because the editor has removed it is perfectly acceptable. If you check that welcome message you will see reference to the Teahouse, which is a great place to ask general questions. Many experience editors follow that location and can help with any queries. That said, there are literally thousands of Wikipedia editors who concentrated in one narrow niche, so I won't be surprised if the response is something along the lines of this is just another such editor. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:45, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I also understand that it can seem alarming that i only edit mostly shootings and/or killing pages but it is only an interest and certainly nothing more than that. Tragedy-91 (talk) 02:40, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2026

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Revdel request

Hi there, I saw you deleted Draft:Progress in Physics of Applied Materials for G11. Would you also please delete two revisions (special:diff/1336007660 and special:diff/1336013071) for the same copyrighted material? I believe it was posted there, before being copy/pasted to the now-deleted draft. Thanks in advance. • Quinn (talk) 15:49, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

As an aside, I find it curious that a journal intended to be an open access journal with licensing for the Journal decided to have full copyright for the website talking about the Journal. I wonder if it was an oversight.

I think I got them both. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Almost certainly an oversight on their part. Thanks again. • Quinn (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

RE: Recent edit reversion due to copyright violation

Hello,

Thank you for bring this issue to my attention. Whilst I acknoledge that some portions of text used in my edit of the Perth Cultural Centre article were taken verbatim from the InHerit website (https://inherit.dplh.wa.gov.au/public/inventory/printsinglerecord/52543ad8-fb54-4a35-8e5b-5678895544d7), the majority of my edit was hand written and created from multiple sources, which I cited.

If you could please temporarily undelete my edit so I can view it, I would be happy to re-edit the text to ensure it is in alignment with Wikipedia's copyright policy. In future, I will use an external text editor when making large edits.

Thanks again,

Tigerten23 (talk) 23:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Done S Philbrick(Talk) 01:41, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, it's all good now Tigerten23 (talk) 12:24, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Revdel plz?

Hello, I recently asked ScottishFinnishRadish for help with a revdel (my usual go-to), but it appears he is away for the moment. I just saw you revdel another copyvio on another page in my watchlist, and was wondering if you would mind helping with this one also? (copy/pasted from the source they included in the edit). Thank you! - Adolphus79 (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Done. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:10, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

I did add some explanatory wording because the original editor did enclosed the material in quotation marks, which can be is an exception to the copyright concerns but in my opinion that wasn't justified in this case. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:17, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I saw your comment on their talk page, and I agree. If it hadn't been a literal copy/paste job, I might have tried to save it myself, but this case was just so blatant (not quoting parts of the source, but just copying the entire content) I felt this was the right decision. Thank you for your help. - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Administrator changes

Vacant0

• Crisco 1492

• Deepfriedokra
• Hbdragon88
• Karl Dickman
• Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Daniel Quinlan

Vanamonde93

Mkdw

Oversight changes

Daniel Quinlan

Arbitration

• Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2026 Steward elections started on 06 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC) and will end on 27 February 2026 at 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process for current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.

Bellum Jugurthinum reversion

Hi Philbrick, Couple questions about the edit reversion. Now I won't deny that the work is uncited and therefore prone to misinterpretation of copyright. However, I was under the impression that the Latin within Bellum Jugurthinum itself cannot be copyright. Happy to be corrected on that. Also for the source listed that conflicts with the edit I made; I've looked at the link and it's not the one I was using(which i've not cited because I was planning on back pedalling after the work was done) or at least it's not the same language, so personal verification is challenging. Bellum Jugurthinum Nomad'ih (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

A couple comments.

A good edit summary is always helpful. I do see that you did include an edit summary but it started with "SUPER WIP". I was going to state that I didn't know what that stood for but I'm guessing in context it means "work in progress".

When I first got involved in Wikipedia (2008), it was not uncommon for many editors to use templates indicating that a section was "under construction". That approach was considered acceptable in the early years of Wikipedia but even in 2008 it was being phased out. I'm sure we could find examples of such templates for years after that but more and more editors felt it was not appropriate to identify articles for major sections of articles as being in progress. (There are some rare examples considered acceptable now which might cover very short periods of time, such as major rewrites or complicated merges.)

Additionally, some leeway might be appropriate for major breaking news but let's face it an article about a document published in 14 BCE is not breaking news, and the notion that one should add a sub-optimal edit with the intention of cleaning it up in a few days doesn't really make sense.

I hadn't looked at the article in full when I made my reversion but I've glanced at it to some extent and it looks like reasonably decent scholarship, all the more reason that if one wants to add a section it should be added when it's ready for prime time, not shoehorned in with a promise to clean it up later.

All these words and I haven't yet addressed copyright. Copyright issues involving translated works can be problematic and while I've done a lot of work in the copyright arena, I'll defer to others if my understanding of the very specific rules regarding translations is not solid. Our tool identified a website containing the exact words you were using. I looked at those words, look for some indication that they were acceptably licensed and seeing no such license decided to revert. I'm aware that very old text is usually out of copyright but I think the rules are different for translations of that work. Whatever the case, the edit text should be properly attributed and surrounded by some context, not just a dump of some Latin without much motivation for inclusion.

I had changed the visibility of your edit to make it not accessible to non-admins but I've changed that. Feel free to work on the section again but I strongly urge you to not just jam something in an promise to clean it up later. S Philbrick(Talk) 18:54, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Request restoration of a previously deleted file version

Greetings. Will you please restore the older version of: File:Poster for the fifth Salon de la Rose+Croix Point Sarluis.jpg? The file was was non-free, but it is now Public Domain. I would like to move it to Commons but it won't let me until the older version is restored. Rockfang (talk) 03:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Done S Philbrick(Talk) 14:29, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Copyright violations in Gender pay gap

Dear @Sphilbrick: I believe there has been a mistake. My edition in Gender pay gap: I have used a publicly available article as a reference: which anyone can consult by following the link. It is not the lyrics of a song or a poem, but an academic work that invites debate and is therefore freely accessible. Most articles are published in indexed journals with limited access to paying readers. This is not the case here. According to Wikipedia's copyright policy: "Since most recently created works are protected by copyright, almost all Wikipedia articles that cite their sources include links to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain permission from the copyright holder before including a link to copyrighted material, just as the author of a book does not need permission to cite another person's work in their bibliography." For all these reasons, I kindly request that my edit be restored, as I believe that the rules have been followed and that there is no copyright infringement. Thank you very much for your attention and for your competence in protecting Wikipedia, a public good... DamAzul (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm happy that you reached out to me. Sometimes when a new editor has an edit reverted, I never hear from them again. We can always use new editors to help accomplish the goals of the Wikipedia project.

Thank you for citing a portion of the Wikipedia copyright policy. You cited the section related to linking which confirms that you do not have to get permission from the copyright holder to link to a source to be used in a citation. However that merely permits you to identify the source of material without getting permission does not in that it's okay to use the content exactly as is.

Please look at the paragraph immediately above the one you cited. In particular, "Therefore, it is legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate the concepts in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia, so long as you do not follow the source too closely. " (emphasis added)

Our copyright detection tool found a 98.15% match between the source material in your edit which means it was not written in your own words. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick, thank you very much for your reply. I will try to rephrase it... Is it possible to access that copyright detection tool? It would be very useful for my relationship with my students... Thanks again. DamAzul (talk) 09:19, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

The tool can be found here:

https://copypatrol.wmcloud.org/en

However it is not structured as a tool that can be applied by you to existing articles are text. It runs in the background. I don't know the exact rules but my speculation based on observation is that it looks at all new edits or perhaps all edits meeting some criteria, and looks for comparisons to existing texts. He does not have the ability to identify if match text is out of copyright or otherwise acceptable, so it simply reports the match and then human editors like myself look at the comparison and determine next steps. S Philbrick(Talk) 17:16, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your cooperation and assistance. I can already see that this can be a very useful tool. I have reread the IESE report and rewritten what I wanted to say in my own words. I hope it is correct now. DamAzul (talk) 10:20, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Bill Ackman

Hi Sphilbrick. I found your name at WP:WREQ - I'm looking for a responsible, uninvolved editor to implement consensus at Talk:Bill Ackman#Support of Israel section. The Gnome expressed concern that he is too involved to implement his own version of my initial proposal, which another editor wrote was "reasonable enough." Would you mind stepping in here? Thank you, FMatPSCM (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I added my name to that list when I was much more active as a general editor. In recent years I've wound down and do little more than copyright issues. I'm trying to ramp back up a little bit but I don't have the bandwidth for this, sorry. (I removed my name from the list.) S Philbrick(Talk) 16:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Listing for discussion of Template:WBB player statistics legend

Template:WBB player statistics legend has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SportsGuy789 (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red - March 2026

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Trelewis Platform

Hi, HaydnMillerUK here, just wondering why the article I made is still named as a draft. You messaged me about copyright but didn't tell me which page it was so I'm assuming its the Trelewis Platform page. Please get back to me about the steps to making the page ive been working on so it can be published as an article and not a draft, cheers. HaydnMillerUK (talk) 00:26, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no involvement in the process to convert from draft to article. The best thing to do is to visit the teahouse.

Experienced editors willing to help new editors hang out at the teahouse, where questions like this are answered:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions S Philbrick(Talk) 00:40, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

• Brendanconway
• Calmer Waters
• Hut 8.5
• Joe Roe
• VersedFenrir

CheckUser changes

Ks0stm

Oversight changes

Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, the web archival service archive.today has been deprecated; links to the site should be removed.
• A request for comment is open to discuss retiring CSD criterion R3 in favour of handling such redirects through RfD.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
• Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
• The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2026 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: A09, AmandaNP, Barras, Count Count, M7, SHB2000, Teles and VIGNERON.
• An Unreferenced articles backlog drive is taking place in March 2026 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Protect

Please protect User talk:Psiĥedelisto thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

It's Fredrick Brennan's account, he died in January so there is no need for people to contact him. The guy behind 8chan. He is internet (in)famous so dumb people show up on his talkpage. Thanks, Polygnotus (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I know nothing about this. I'm curious why you contacted me — is there some reason you think I'm involved. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

WP:ANI got this nice recently active admin tool near the top. You happened to be at the top of the list. I don't think you have to watch the Q Into the Storm documentary and listen to all the QAA Podcast podcasts to get every single detail.

Some dude died. Dumb people leave dumb messages on his usertalkpage. If you protect the usertalkpage they can't leave any dumb messages anymore. Polygnotus (talk) 13:00, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Wow, I did not know about that tool. I'll have to check it out. However, 95% of my activity recently copyright issues. I'm trying to keep reading AN ANI and the village pump so I have a clue about what's going on. I am aware that that it's a procedure to protect editors pages when death occurs, but I've never done it and did not feel comfortable I know what steps are to be taken as part of proper investigation. Sorry. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll ask someone else. Yeah that tool is very useful. The original developer left but it still works fine. Polygnotus (talk) 13:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 73

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 73, January–February 2026

• Four new partnerships
• User survey thanks

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 12:05, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User:Sphilbrick and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Women in Red – April 2026

Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369 Online events: New: Countries starting with D, E and F | Women's Works: Written works | Cascading Women Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: CEE women Tip of the month: When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked. Someone might be inspired to create an article for her. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging