User talk:Spirit Fox99
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome. Let's discuss.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
April 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vlade Divac, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. The text which you removed was supported by references, and there is no sign of any discussion on the article talk page to explain its removal. - David Biddulph (talk) 19:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vlade Divac, you may be blocked from editing. You again removed referenced text. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- It was explained quite clearly. I will revert it back to the origina stable version which has stood for years. You will be reported for misuse of administrative powers if you try to block me for a justified edit. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
Your recent editing history at Nikola Jokić shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —Bagumba (talk) 01:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Then I would like help with an issue. 'The Joker' nickname should be bolded the same as in other NBA articles. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 01:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there. Generally in these situations, follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. You left an earlier question on my talk page, which you since reverted, but in the interest of equity, the other party's history suggests that they should already be aware of the edit warring policy. In good faith, I gave you a courtesy notification, in the event you did not know. It's good that both of you are discussing this. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 03:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, thank you for your response. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 03:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there. Generally in these situations, follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. You left an earlier question on my talk page, which you since reverted, but in the interest of equity, the other party's history suggests that they should already be aware of the edit warring policy. In good faith, I gave you a courtesy notification, in the event you did not know. It's good that both of you are discussing this. Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 03:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
