User talk:Srnec

Quick facts Five years! ...

Precious

Five years!

Close

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:58, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

		All-Around Amazing Barnstar
		Yes, a belated congratulations on the 20th anniversary of your account creation is overdue, as of 12 October 2025! —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, you recently performed a page move of Capture of Le Quesnoy to Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) which I am trying to get my head around. It looks as though it was done as part of work for disambiguation of Siege of Le Quesnoy although I am not sure that was entirely necessary as the 1918 action was quite distinct from a siege (when creating the article, I used "Capture of..." since that was how my sources generally described it). Anyhow, the query I have is why "Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918)" shows up here (see line 298) with an assessment of redirect when the page title, date, and size values are all for the article page itself. Shouldn't the assessment be GA as shown on the talk page? Cheers, Zawed (talk) 21:55, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

P.S. I thought the issue may have been an incorrect redirect on one of the talk pages so changed that to what I thought it should have been, but a bot has since reverted it. I probably shouldn't have touched it anyway as I'm not great on the intricacies of page moves. Zawed (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure why Xtools shows the wrong page assessment, but I suspect it will self-correct soon. As for the move, that was because Le Quesnoy has been captured many times, even more than our dab page shows. See fr:Siège du Quesnoy. Srnec (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

OK thanks. Zawed (talk) 10:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Staveren, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Staverenadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

I am aware that you are not entirely satisfied with the present structure of the articles Crusading movement and Crusades, and that you rarely undertake article reviews. Nevertheless, I should be most grateful for your thoughts as part of the FAR of Crusading movement here. My aim is to bring the article to a genuinely high standard, irrespective of its formal status on Wikipedia, and your suggestions would greatly assist in that process. Borsoka (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Srnec. Thank you for your work on Hujrids. Another editor, Laterthanyouthink, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Laterthanyouthink}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:33, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radelgar of Benevento is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radelgar of Benevento until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 03:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abbasid expeditions to East Africa, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbasid expeditions to East Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anonymus Cyzicenus, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anonymous was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geneocide of Libya, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libyan genocide was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC)