User talk:Stanjik

Hi Stanjik! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Tanhaji, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 03:13, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ekdalian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Akbaruddin Owaisi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Unexplained removal of sourced content is equivalent to vandalism! Ekdalian (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello as you can look inti the the source it was discredited by a Bloomberg article again i removed it since DNA news is a part of Zee news a infamously dubious source Stanjik (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Taslima Nasrin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Oh shoot sorry about that I felt as if it violated NPOV as it included adjectives such as blasted,she tried to damage control I mean it is obviously not considerate of NPOV policy right I'm sorry if I'm wrong Stanjik (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at No Fathers in Kashmir, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Tanhaji. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Mike Schwartz (activist). When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

I feel like some of the edits could be kept such as the removal of the unnecessary explanation of ALS then again I'm the novice here. Stanjik (talk) 20:14, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

If you intend to contribute productively here, please slow down and learn more about Wikipedia first. Virtually all of your edits so far have been removed. You cannot just copy text from elsewhere - you need to write in your own words. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Your edit to Rekha Gupta has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

I apologize deeply for this,I thought simply citing such article was enough I wasn't aware of copyright infringement extending to print media,I'll me more careful and do more research the next time. Stanjik (talk) 20:06, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plasticwonder (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on N. Mahalingam, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

To be more clear, you cannot say that someone has been accused of sexual misconduct without giving sources. You made a number of improvements to the article, so I'm not reverting the rest of your changes. Jessicapierce (talk) 01:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

I see what you meant as far as the sources go, so I removed the Christian News source, but you need to be careful in the future about removing sources blindly. Nonetheless, I apologize for the revert.

Well regards, Plasticwonder (talk) 09:10, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Cheers Stanjik (talk) 10:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 21:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is a standard message to inform you that the Balkans or Eastern Europe is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TylerBurden (talk) 08:25, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page WatchPeopleDie.tv, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC)