User talk:StarryGrandma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
MOS:AVOIDBOLD misuse
Bit of a late reply (I just happened to check my reverted edits today), but I wanted to thank you for this revert. I totally misunderstood the MOS here and I appreciate the correction. /home/gracen/ (they/them) 18:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
=
Submission declined for not meeting scientific criteria
Hello, My article was declined on the basis of not meeting academic criteria. However,
Criterion 2: The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
The text states: "In 2023, Dragan Bošković was awarded the state Order of Karađorđe's Star for his contributions to applied research in AI and digital assets [17][18]." It also mentions he was nominated for the Leadership Award by the Government Blockchain Association in 2024 [19].
The Order of Karađorđe's Star is a state order of Serbia, indicating a national-level recognition. This appears to meet Criterion 2.
On this basis the submission should be approved. Boskovicdd (talk) 13:44, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Peacock & your BLP guide
I really like your BLP Guide, and have pointed it out to quite a few newbies writing academic BLPs. One request; please add a brief paragraph on avoiding peacock. Quite a few times I have accepted AfC or passed at NPP after having removed peacock such as "pioneering", "innovative", "known for" etc. (I see less weasel, but maybe a minor mention of that also.) Ldm1954 (talk) 14:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for recommending this. I will add a bit about proper encyclopedia tone and words to avoid. I myself am a user of "known for" so I will have to think a bit on that and maybe recommend alternatives. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:02, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Growth News #35

A quarterly update from the Growth team on our work to improve the new editor experience.
New releases
English Wikipedia gets "Add a Link" Structured Task
We released the "Add a Link" Structured Task to 100% of accounts at English Wikipedia on Tuesday, September 2nd (before then it was available to 20% of accounts).
Growth features for Wikidata
After examining if the Growth features and Mentorship could be adapted to Wikidata, we activated the Growth features on Beta Wikidata to allow for testing and discussion (T400937). Although some features, like Suggested Edits, are Wikipedia-specific, the Growth team designed most features to be more wiki-agnostic.
Work in progress
Revise Tone Structured Task
The Growth team is making progress on the technical architecture, onboarding design, and early user testing. We are targeting an A/B test before the end of this year, with constructive edits by newcomers as the primary success metric.
Add a link to more wikis
The machine learning team has been working on a new model that can suggest links to more languages, including Urdu, Chinese, and Japanese Wikipedias. We are starting to release the “Add a Link” feature to Wikipedias that weren’t supported by the previous model.
Add a link, which can be configured by the community locally, increases the chance that a new contributor will make their first edit and then continue to participate in Wikipedia.
Research
The Growth team is involved in several research initiatives to help guide our future work:
Progression System – We have published initial findings from interviews with 10 English and French Wikipedia newcomers. The research examined motivations, challenges, and feedback on a prototype system intended to help editors build confidence, develop skills, and contribute more constructively over time.
Mobile Web Editing Research – This project combines quantitative and qualitative data, community feedback, and user journey analysis to identify possible ways to enhance the mobile editing experience.
Newcomers Survey – This project surveys successful newcomers on English Wikipedia to understand their early editing experiences, tool use, and community interactions.
Community events
The Growth team participated in several community events to listen, share, and collaborate on improving newcomer experiences across Wikimedia projects.
Wikimania - Organizers as key partners to support newcomers' growth in our movement
This session invited organizers to share how they introduce newcomers to Growth features and the challenges they encounter. The discussion focused on common newcomer questions and opportunities to strengthen collaboration in supporting new editors.
Wikimania - Lightning Talk: Structured Tasks
This talk demonstrated how Structured Tasks help newcomers take their first successful steps on Wikipedia. It shared impact data, community configurations, and a demo of “Add a Link,” illustrating how these tasks make editing more accessible and sustainable, particularly for mobile contributors.
Wikimania - Building a Sustainable Future for Wikimedia Contributors
With active editor numbers declining, the Contributors Strategy aims to create a clearer, more engaging path for participation. This session, led by the WMF Contributors group with involvement from the Editing, Growth, Moderator Tools, and Connection (formerly Campaigns) teams, highlighted efforts to streamline contributor experiences, offer structured and mobile-friendly workflows, and foster meaningful engagement. Participants learned about ongoing initiatives and shared feedback to help shape a more inclusive and sustainable future for Wikimedia contributors.
CEE Meeting - Retaining beginners and improving content moderation: an inclusive and sustainable future for Wikipedia contributors
Many communities face a decline in volunteer engagement. Newcomers often leave soon after joining, while experienced editors struggle to manage increasingly complex workflows and overwhelming backlogs. We presented the Contributors Strategy and the different features and workflows that can help communities to address these challenges. We listened to the specific needs of the CEE communities to help guide the Contributors teams' work.
Growth team's newsletter prepared by the Growth team and posted by bot • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
10:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Hello!
Hi @StarryGrandma! I heard you are a retired astrophysicist. That's my dream job. I love anything to do with space. I love to edit space-related articles too. Well, nice to see you! 72011copperfan2 (talk) 21:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)