User talk:Strange Orange

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beck–Fahrner syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 14:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

The article Beck–Fahrner syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Beck–Fahrner syndrome for comments about the article, and Talk:Beck–Fahrner syndrome/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ajpolino -- Ajpolino (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations on getting Beck–Fahrner syndrome added to the Wikipedia:Good articles list. I wanted to extend an invitation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. (That's the chat page on wiki where a group of editors hang out and talk about improving medicine-related articles.) It's a great place to ask about finding appropriate sources for biomedical information or how to write about medical content. If you're interested, please put the page on your watchlist or just drop by to check it out whenever you feel like it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

On 18 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beck–Fahrner syndrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that only approximately 50 individuals have been diagnosed with Beck–Fahrner syndrome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beck–Fahrner syndrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Beck–Fahrner syndrome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,166 views (673.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Salt water aspiration syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

The article Salt water aspiration syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Salt water aspiration syndrome for comments about the article, and Talk:Salt water aspiration syndrome/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:45, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

On 7 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt water aspiration syndrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a person required intensive care after being splashed with salt water by a beluga whale? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt water aspiration syndrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Salt water aspiration syndrome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,307 views (692.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks on behalf of WikiProject Underwater diving Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 06:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Skraban–Deardorff syndrome you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

The article Skraban–Deardorff syndrome you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Skraban–Deardorff syndrome for comments about the article, and Talk:Skraban–Deardorff syndrome/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

On 22 July 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Skraban–Deardorff syndrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as of 2023 only about 150 people had been diagnosed with Skraban–Deardorff syndrome? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Skraban–Deardorff syndrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Skraban–Deardorff syndrome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Benign variant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 27 § Benign variant until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 22:01, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello Strange Orange!

I see you usually edit on stranger topics, but I was wondering if you'd like to help out with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign. The goal is to get all top-importance articles of WikiProject Medicine to B-class or above. Many of these highly-read articles are dreadfully out of date, meaning we're doing a disservice to our readers. In the campaign, the plan is to check all articles (including those now assessed at B or higher), and get them up-to-date and understandable to a wide audience. Will you join in?

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

BTW the MRI image should go in the diagnosis section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Medicine-related_articles per... https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=O%27Donnell-Luria%E2%80%93Rodan_syndrome&diff=prev&oldid=1329713608 ...in any event, keep up the good work, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:08, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Ozzie10aaaa. Brain MRIs in ODLURO unfortunately do not aid in diagnosis or management. Individuals get MRI brain ordered because they have seizures (to rule out tumors/infections), not necessarily because they have ODLURO. MRI results in this condition are pretty non-specific and can be seen with dozens of other conditions. I put that in presentation to complement the prose "neuroimaging usually shows benign brain abnormalities such as thin corpus callosum, white matter hyperintensities, reduced cerebral and cerebellar volume." Diagnosis of ODLURO is based on genetic/genomic testing alone, so it would not be a good fit for that section. Brain MRIs also do not influence management, nor do we follow them for clinical improvement, so it does not quite go with that either. I will clarify in the caption that these changes are not specific to ODLURO so it fits better within the Presentation section. — Strange Orange | 18:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 05:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are enjoying 2026 thus far! I'm reaching out to you since you signed yourself up as a participant of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026. To get the ball rolling on this project, I'd like to invite you to help fill out the progress table. If you (like me) have a hard time figuring out tables, I'd suggest editing it in the visual editor to make it easier. Just chose any article from the table and check for the following:

1. Sources - are they recent (last 10 years, in accordance with WP:MEDDATE)? Are the sources from a reliable source (I personally use the script User:Headbomb/unreliable to aid in this)? Is there an over relliance on WP:PRIMARY sources?
2. Coverage - Does the article cover the main aspects of the topic? Sometimes it can be helpful to check the article template for the topic to see if there is any major gaps in information (Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Article_templates). WP:MEDSECTIONS also provides an easy overview to the various sections. Are there areas where the article goes into too much detail?
3. Accuracy - This one ties into the last two and mostly checks for WP:DUE weight as well as factual errors. Keep an eye out for primary sources such as case studies or extremely old sources being used to support something that is phrased as a fact.
4. Prose - Can be a bit tricky to judge at first but I'd recommend not getting too hung up on this one. Simply focus on if the articles wording is readable and can be understood. If you find that the way something is written gives you a headache then the prose is probably needing some work.
5. Images and infobox - Is there some images included in the article to aid in understanding? Are there tables with unclear information?
6. Understandability - Is the WP:LEDE understandable to a casual reader or does it require in depth knowledge of the topic? Is the easiest to understand information presented first with details given later on?

After that you just need to copy and paste the current assessment rating. You can also sign yourself up as a volunteer to help improve the page and add any notes that may help others. Feel free to to tackle as many or as little of these articles as you would like, and if you only feel comfortable assessing some of the criteria that's okay too, any bit helps!

If you're looking for some articles that need some love the following articles are assessed as C class: addiction, allergy, anemia, autism, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, COVID-19 vaccine, cancer, cataract, diarrhea, enteritis, health effects of tobacco, kidney disease, mental disorder, and stroke.

Feel free to ask question on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026, my talkpage, or in response to this message! IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 18:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

On 19 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that most individuals with O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome have a larger than average head size, unless they have a more severe form of the condition in which case it might be smaller than average? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, O'Donnell-Luria–Rodan syndrome), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 12:03, 19 February 2026 (UTC)