User talk:StupidLookingKid
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi StupidLookingKid! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| Your good-humored response is much appreciated. Also your suggested award, one I'd love to get: Forbes's new 80 under 80. Thanks for bringing a smile to Wikipedia. HouseOfChange (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC) |
July 2025
Hello, I'm Raladic. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gender-critical feminism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Raladic: There is nothing ‘POV’ about reporting what is in the source – I suggest you apologise to StupidLookingKid. Sweet6970 (talk) 20:48, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- I have responded on the talk page of the article StupidLookingKid (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Doug Weller talk 10:55, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Many thanks StupidLookingKid (talk) 12:28, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#NPOV issue at Gender-critical feminism#Academic freedom. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 21:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)
- Noted - thank you StupidLookingKid (talk) 07:54, 11 July 2025 (UTC)