User talk:SuperDF1-1

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There have to be three or more sources as described in the template above (all of: in-depth, from reliable sources, secondary, independent of Fenwick (and of each other)). If that's not possible, there can't be an article. IFF you do manage to cite three such sources, then proceed by (i) removing all external links (links other than to other Wikipedia articles) from the body text, and (ii) providing a good reference for every assertion (not just a lot of them). (In this edit, I started the work for you, in order to show you what to do.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Fenwick and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Hoary, Thank you for your speedy edit and comments. So I have a question, does that mean interviews with the subject on news outlets would count as reliable sources? These aren't peer reviewed works of course (though edited by the outlet).

I understand on taking out external links - so in your edit you got rid of the external Shelter link, right?

Thank you!

Joe SuperDF1-1 (talk) 12:43, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, SuperDF1-1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hoary (talk) 07:08, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, SuperDF1-1. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jim Fenwick".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2025 (UTC)