User talk:Szyign

It seems you removed Greece from the ESC 2022 map by mistake. Can you re-add it? Thanks. DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Oh, of course, sorry. I accidentally uploaded the version without Greece, now I've corrected it, thanks for your vigilance! Szyign (talk) 10:47, 18 August 2021 (CET)

This is Darthon again. Can you color in Armenia as purple in JESC 2021 Map.svg? Its participation for JESC 2021 got confirmed. DarthonTheOverseer (talk) 19:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Are you sure about that? I looked at it and Armenia is already colored purple. Szyign (talk) 21:16, 2 September 2021 (CET)

European Hit Radio statistics would appear to fail WP:SINGLENETWORK as they apply to one radio station. They have previously been removed from articles by other editors citing this, and I'm inclined to agree so please avoiding adding them. Ss112 15:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding this edit to Kim Petras discography, please refrain from adding more than 10 chart columns in a wikitable. This is both outlined at WP:DISCOGSTYLE (a proposed guideline widely followed) and an WP:ACCESSIBILITY concern. Thank you. Ss112 00:25, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Radioairplay.fm has previously been called into question at WT:CHARTS in this discussion. There might not be a consensus there, but there are questions about the website's validity and we don't just add charts from any old website on the Internet if it's been questioned. Please immediately stop adding this website to articles. Same with Turkish airplay charts sourced to an unofficial Twitter account. Ss112 12:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

I noticed the topalbaniaradio chart was added to some articles, which seems to be against WP:SINGLEVENDOR. I believe some of these were added by you so before I continue to remove them I thought I'll consult with you. Is there any reason to think this chart does not violate WP:SINGLEVENDOR? Are their ranking methods known? Happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi, probably not. I added them cause i saw them in other articles like Dua Lipa's singles articles. My bad then, im so sorry for that! Szyign (talk) 13:06, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

No worries, happy new year! Muhandes (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Bedoes. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:54, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Oh okay, I will remember about it next time, thank you for informing me and sorry for the problem! Szyign (talk) 22:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zinaida Kupriyanovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Lightoil. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ice Cream (Blackpink and Selena Gomez song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The blog is not a reliable source Lightoil (talk) 12:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

It is reliable source. There is no other archive of charts from Suriname from this period. As proof that they are real, you can compare the Top 5 charts published on the official Facebook profile, which coincides with each week from the blog. Probably the top 40 was only available on the official site during a given week and then archived only on this blog, hence there is no other source for the top 40 from that period. Take into account that the Nationale Top 40 is reliable. Szyign (talk) 12:58, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Paper9oll stop reverting and answer first. Szyign (talk) 13:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Szyign I would suggest that you STOP adding any of this chart along with its unreliable source with immediate effect. Fyi, WP:BLOGS are considered as unreliable source, there are no exception based on your rationale provided. In short, this chart is considered as non-notable per WP:CHARTS, if you have any concern on its usage, please ask them at WT:CHARTS instead. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

The warning before saving edits clearly says "They may be used only with caution and for non-controversial material where the blog or website is owned by the subject of the article", so by saying there are no exceptions you are telling an untruth. And if it is not a reliable chart, then why is it called the official chart of Suriname on its article? @Paper9oll Szyign (talk) 13:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Szyign Kindly read WP:BLOGS instead, nowhere does the quoted line, you provided is stated there explictly. Thanks for notifyting the article exists, I did a quick scan through and it doesn't meet WP:GNG requirements either. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

The quoted line is in the warning before saving changes. I didn't say it was in your long, hard-to-read article about nothing. Szyign (talk) 13:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

@Szyign Fyi, the "long, hard-to-read article about nothing" is part of WP:RS which in turn is part of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, it isn't something I randomly quoted nor did I make this up. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

There is no need to add more than two charts for a tiny music market (of 1.8 million people) like Latvia. If there's already two in a chart table, that's enough. These Latvian charts on Wikipedia are a bit suspect to begin with—are they even official sources?—but even if they are, there is no need for multiple airplay charts representing Latvia. One is enough. Please bear this in mind going forward, as I will be removing any more than two that I see on song articles. Thanks. Ss112 07:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

They’re literally published on the official Latvian Music Producers Association website, so yes - they’re official. There’s general chart (which is posted without Airplay note), and the only Airplay based one. There are more than them cause someone is adding EHR, which is European Hit Radio chart and it shouldn’t be added to begin with, cause it’s only a radiostation chart. Szyign (talk) 13:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

AGATA is the official provider of Latvian charts and the one which the country recognises not the ones from TopHit. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:35, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Belgian people of Somalian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Eurovision Young Musicians 2024, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Haoreima (talk) 22:59, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Ukrainian people of Peruvian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:51, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

The reliability, notability and stability of Radiomonitor charts has come into question at Wikipedia talk:Record charts as previously explained to you by another user. They are not included in the Wikipedia:Record charts/Sourcing guide. Do not add these charts and do not add the Lithuania TopHit radio chart when there is already the singles chart published by the Lithuanian company AGATA. 'Cool Marc ✉ 00:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to ask - Lithuanian company AGATA provides 100% streaming charts, so TopHit Airplay in my opinion should be included too, since it's not the same type of chart. What do you think? @Coolmarc Szyign (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi Szyign. I noticed that you used ethnicelebs.com as a reference for biographical information in Dasha (singer). Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 17:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know.. Szyign (talk) 18:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Here's how the tables look with my HTML code and without HTML code. It actually makes the table cleaner. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:50, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

In different approximations and distances it looks different, in my case it stretched the table very wide.... check if maybe such an option I have now published at the article would not be better Szyign (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Sorry for taking long to answer, I didn't receive any notifications. The numbers you entered have unfortunately created an additional line in one of the items. The "22em" value was the smallest I could go. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Okay, no worries! Szyign (talk) 10:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Can you please stop adding this to articles. Per WP:RECORDCHARTS, a single or album chart needs to be affiliated to the IFPI and independently verified. Nothing on the SMRRTV website suggests any independence other than what's played on their own channel, making this WP:SINGLEVENDOR and not appropriate for use. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

I was going to undo this until I realised how many articles you've added it to. Please go through and undo it on all articles. If evidence suggests it is a legitimate chart, please discuss this at WP:GOODCHARTS talkpage. If the community agrees then this can stay. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I have created a draft (Draft:Pink Velvet Theatre) for the album, can you help me make it good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.177.6 (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Please stop adding San Marino charts to dozen of articles. As Lil-unique1 has already explained to you, "per WP:RECORDCHARTS, a single or album chart needs to be affiliated to the IFPI and independently verified. Nothing on the SMRRTV website suggests any independence other than what's played on their own channel, making this WP:SINGLEVENDOR and not appropriate for use." You didn't discuss this on WP:GOODCHARTS's talk page, and you are keeping adding this micro-chart neverthless.--Alienautic (talk) 12:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. When you introduce a "Weekly charts" or "Monthly charts" subheading like here, there's no reason the "C" in charts should be a capital letter. Ss112 21:05, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

okay tysm for letting me know i wasnt sure haha Szyign (talk) 22:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you please check WP:RECORDCHARTS to see what are appropriate charts. The Suriname Top 40 is not reliable as its methodology is dubious ("social media trends"), equally the San Marino Top 40 is not reliable - there's no evidence of independence or IFPI affiliation. Its a WP:SINGLEVENDOR chart which means we cannot include it on wikipedia. PLEASE STOP ADDING IT. You will need to go through and remove any additions of San Marino Top 40. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I see you really like to use the word "Airplay", fine, but it's appropriate, say, on the song page itself, but not in the discography summary table; it just clutters things up and doesn't add any meaning, because, I repeat, there are no OTHER charts for these countries anyway.

And again, please don't undo edits until you're sure you're undoing exactly what you wanted, and not everything. Sanslogique (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Right, my mistake, by the amount of kb I assumed in advance that there was nothing more in that edit, sorry. As for the rest - the mentioned columns don't represent combined charts so they shouldn't be written as just the country name without the Airplay information, otherwise it's misleading. Yes, we don't have charts from those countries that represent streaming + airplay, but that doesn't change the fact that it should be highlighted that it is only an airplay chart, since it's really different than combined charts. Szyign (talk) 11:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

You know, in the US, for example, there are a great many Billboard charts, so the tables usually have the addition "R&B", "Jazz", "Rock", and this makes sense, but in this case it is not necessary. I left "Airplay" only for Latvia and Lithuania, although it would be smart to add the name of the chart (AGATA and TopHit) to each column, so as not to confuse the reader.--Sanslogique (talk) 11:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

I've removed your continual addition of multiple charts. Please read WP:RECORDCHARTS. Where the national provider or nationally reocngised provider of a chart is present E.G. AGATA for Lithuania, it is duplication and WP:INDISCRIMINATE to also include TopHit charts for airplay in Lithuania. It becomes cumbersome and over the top for markets like Lithuania which are so small. Please please please stop creating work for people. Read the messages posted on your talkpage and also on articles you edit when your edits are undone. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 23:53, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Category:Number-one singles in San Marino has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:25, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eurovision Song Contest 2025, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ERT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Hey, @Szyign.

Do you remember the "Apt." discussion? OK, just for your information, I've just found this text in this page: "In addition to the country-specific charts, we publish TopHit Global Radio Chart, for which data is collected through monitoring broadcasts from over 2,500 radio stations in 40 countries worldwide." Just if you wanna consider it, you can start a constructive discussion about this. Thanks for reading. Santi (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

You know, to be honest I have a lot on my mind right now because of school, and I have no idea what to say more about this situation with CIS as of now, but I'll be happy to give a comment in the discussion if one arises! Szyign (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Regarding your edit on WizTheMc, if somebody reverts you, please take your disagreement to the talk page in future instead of trying to sort it out through an edit summary. I do not see Israel's airplay-based chart as significant in basically any context (certainly not as significant as Italy's larger market and multi-metric chart), and besides, Mako Hit List has now been basically deemed unusable on Wikipedia, because as @Lil-unique1: has pointed out here, it includes fan votes in its methodology, which absolutely makes it ineligible for use on Wikipedia per WP:BADCHARTS. Even if this isn't true, it openly states on its website that it weighs in what people in Israel listen to on TikTok, which has precedent at BADCHARTS, so please cease using it. Thank you. Skyversay (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

First of all, it's not an Airplay-based chart but a combined radio+streaming chart. The part with "fan votes methodology" makes zero sense, since they stated literally opposite here.

"In other words, there has never been a real parade in Israel that was free from any manipulation by voters or editors. Until today! mako is proud to be the first media outlet to present Israel's real parade by developing a unique algorithm that weighs the tastes of hundreds of thousands of Israelis who listen to songs every day on a variety of platforms."

Stop spreading misinformation. Szyign (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

I was repeating what Lil-unique1 said, and then did my own research and saw that it says it integrates data from TikTok. They wouldn't mention this if they weren't incorporating some sort of trend data from a social network, which throws its reliability and usage into question. Maybe you should stop going on chart-adding sprees when you find a new one that calls itself "official". Skyversay (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

So in the same article they wrote that their charts are ‘free from any manipulation by voters or editors’, then mentioned TikTok because ‘they wouldn't mention this if they weren't incorporating some sort of trend data from a social network’? It doesn't make one bit of sense.

Also, as for ‘Maybe you should stop going on chart-adding sprees when you find a new one that calls itself “official”.’, if you really care about caring about charts then you could refrain from personal taunts, because like you I am trying to work on covering 100% of the missing charts, instead of insulting me let's have a discussion on a level with using good arguments, not personal insults. Szyign (talk) 18:31, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello again mate, please do not remove <ref name=" " > when updating charts, because it means that the ref is reused somewhere in the body of the article. I also use them to keep track of your chart update so that I can update the prose. Thank you again for doing such an amazing job. dxneo (talk) 19:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

oh yeah, sorry i didn't see :) will make sure to not do this again! Szyign (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Mr, What is your nationality? 188.162.228.200 (talk) 12:49, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Polish, why do you ask? Szyign (talk) 13:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry, i'm relatively inexperienced in editing. I saw you have made several changes to Estonia's Eurovision entry regarding Tommy Cash. What do you think how to protect the page from Russian propaganda?! It was protected til the end of eurovision (I asked to protect the page) but now the russian activists have activated again. His mother is from Ukraine... The wiki page in estonian end in Ukraine - they too had to turn edits down...

It seems to me, the world is very interested in this artist, some still look into wikipedia and assume it is correct - not checking out his social media content and interviews. All that I refer to is covered in discussion page and history page. Did you mind, for example, when the page is protected somehow even in the future?! Does it make editing unreasonably difficult? Thanks. The turning edits back is also very, very time consuming and they do it cleverly, in two or in more parts, so "ordinary" visitor cannot turn vandalism back unless they know how to do it. Muruhaldjas (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I don't mind the article being protected in this case, but you know - I'm not the one who can change it :) But yeah, that's not an issue to me. I'm just adding charts positions in the singles table. Szyign (talk) 18:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks. So now it is protected. If I understood you and others correctly, protecting article is no big deal, if people want contribute they totally can do so and they can do so easily. And this is amazing, now he is 93th on Billboard Global 200 chart. I'm not sure how to write about that since I'm no expert in music charts. I just read about it from local news that this is a big deal. I checked it out from https://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-global-200/ so it is indeed so that his Eurovision entry Espresso Macchiato is there 93th right now... If you have time and enthusiasm please contribute on that if this is an important chart. Thank you so much! Muruhaldjas (talk) 18:17, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure, added :) Have a nice day Szyign (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

You seem to have a habit at this point of replacing more meaningful active listening charts (what people choose to listen to) with the inconsequential airplay ones you add to Wikipedia. Please stop making silly replacements like this. Arbitrary playlisting or "spins" by DJs (passive listening) in a tiny market like Latvia does not compare to and will never be as important as streaming and downloads in a bigger market. Skyversay (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Wow, you could have written that less aggressively, but I understand that you obviously needed to take it out on me. OK, understood, I won't care about this article any more. Szyign (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I'm not "taking" anything out on you, nor is it about the Lola Young article in particular. You've done this multiple times and it's starting to rankle me, because airplay is just not as significant a statistic as streaming and downloads in 2025—and I'm saying that as an editor who does add some airplay charts to Wikipedia. Also, please don't "fix" something that isn't incorrect. Since most Norwegian chart citations no longer use the VG-lista website, I don't feel it's appropriate to credit VG-lista. I don't feel we need to make this "consistent" with what the single chart template says either, because there are several single chart templates that use different charts or publishers depending on the source—for example, Ireland uses both the IRMA and the OCC. The Norwegian chart isn't even published first by VG anyway; the Topplista website updates before VG does, and IFPI Norge compiles and provides the data anyway. I don't care to lobby to change what the single chart template says, but while I'm using the Topplista website, I believe it's fitting to credit IFPI Norge. Skyversay (talk) 02:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Then change it in single chart template too, otherwise it's misleading. And yes, you were surly to me in this message, thus why I felt attacked. Szyign (talk) 09:13, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

Ahmet Yön is the original creator of the song “APT.” I am writing to you from Turkey. The lyrics of that song belong to me. In 2024, Bruno Mars and Rosie Park came to Turkey. At first, I thought everything was a joke, but I recently realized the truth.

That song belongs to me, and I am asking you to please contact me. I have been sending messages to Atlantic Records via Instagram, but I have not received any response.

Please take this matter seriously and get in touch with me.

Thank you. 2A00:1880:A1CA:277E:A0D9:67E9:1D92:A53F (talk) 17:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

You are 100% evading a block on User:Achmeat and that is consideres as Block Evasion. Untamed1910 (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

I noticed you changed Seven's #1 peak to match the #3 peak the chart history is currently displaying, but chart archives show that the song debuted at #1 in July 2023. I remember when it did and I'm positive the editor who originally added the peak to the page back then didn't make a mistake either (there are also numerous screenshots of the chart issue all over Twitter, so I know we didn't imagine the #1 debut). As another example, Left and Right also debuted at #1 (CP BBVH100 chart history archive as additional proof), but according to both JK and CP's current chart histories, the song doesn't even exist because it's not listed under either artist, which isn't true at all. Imho, we shouldn't be changing proved peaks just yet. If you're amenable, I'll replace the template with a manual ref instead (complete with supporting archive), to support the original chart information. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 23:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Yeah, I think the best solution would be to replace it manually with the archive, to avoid future misunderstagings, because that is why I was convinced that the peak was wrong (as it now appears in the source provided). Have a nice day! Szyign (talk) 23:41, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Wonderful. Making the updates now. Have a great day as well. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

esc spo Happyhappy2014 (talk) 10:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

This argument is such a non sense. The fact that some media write about something once and not once is irrelevant. And if you want to follow this line of reasoning, I have had a look at previous media publications especially for you and they clearly regularly refer to ESCSpot, so the fact that they did not write about something does not discredit another portal just because the editors of the first one are lazy. Here you can see Eurovoix quoting ESCSpot: 1 2, here you can see ESCPlus quoting ESCSpot: 1, here's the other one 2, and here too 3. So, the fact that sometimes the media write about something and sometimes ignore something does not mean that all the information is false. Furthermore, the sources you keep deleting have evidence given at the bottom of the articles, which you can read and analyse yourself. Szyign (talk) 11:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Ok you win ...thats what you want Happyhappy2014 (talk) 14:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

I also think this is useless. Happyhappy2014 (talk) 14:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey, are you sure the ref you linked here is the right one? SD doesn't appear anywhere on this chart issue. Same for the DSYLM entry, which says "Chile" in the url. -- Carlobunnie (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Oh, sorry! I think I accidently messed up the links while copy-pasting. I will repair it now, thanks for letting me know :) Szyign (talk) 00:35, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

@Carlobunnie everything should be fixed now :)! Szyign (talk) 00:53, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

There is no reason to turn a perfectly readable article into a mess full of red links. The fact that there are articles on Italian Wikipedia means nothing, because en.wiki has different criteria. The interlanguage links are not something that should be added systematically, but rather included when you believe that the specific article could be created, starting by translating from another language. What is the point of adding red links that can never be filled? Of course, charting can be a hint of notability, but did you conduct research on each individual link to ensure that those songs have enough coverage for an article? Additionally, have you noticed that Non so chi ha creato il mondo ma so che era innamorato already exists as a redirect? There is no point in adding a redirect that points back to this very page. Alienautic (talk) 10:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Szyign. I am a new person to wikipedia. So could you please tell me how to edit the map of junior eurovision 2025 like colouring the map and inserting links to wiki pages of junior eurovisison in the map I am very inspired by how much you have contributed to the wiki page of junior eurovision 2025. Eurofan 1235688 (talk) 08:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Wonderful Life (Hurts song). When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Bad (David Guetta and Showtek song). When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in yellow at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 23:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

okay, sorry Szyign (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hey Skyign! I've noticed that you've been adding weekly chart performances to various album articles. Since I'm not yet very familiar with that process, would you mind checking the chart performances for some albums (such as this one or that one)? I'd really appreciate it if you could add more chart data to those pages. Thanks so much for your work! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 08:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Hey! Unfortunately, in the case of MØ, I couldn't find any outside of the countries that were already in the article, but I added a few charts on the Fletcher album :) Szyign (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your work :))!! Camilasdandelions (talk!) 16:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. Moldova is very late to the party with this song :)) Thank you for adding the peaks. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Haha, yeah for some reason their radios love to chart older songs! ^^ Np! Szyign (talk) 14:54, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

The linked chart issue in your edit doesn't show "Who" anywhere on the ranking? Are you sure it's the right one? -- Carlobunnie (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey @Carlobunnie, sorry for late reply, I was on a holiday trip :) Yes, I mistakenly forgot to change 2025 to 2024 in the link, my bad. Seems to be fixed now! Have a nice day Szyign (talk) 14:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

• Monitor Latino is, by definition, an airplay chart. I never said they produce charts based on sales and streaming as you claimed here. I clarified this already in the article, in case you think I am making these airplay charts appear as the main charts for those countries.
• The cited sources do not specify a publication date, only the tracking week is provided. Hence, we leave out "date=" in the citation. You also changed the access date without any explanation.
• You mistranslated the source title to "...English", while "Anglo" should remain as is since it's already in English and part of the chart's name. The accurate translation is also "November 10-16," not "From 10 to 16 November." You are creating your own translation so calling you out for mistranslation is valid.
• Katy Perry is American, so we use month-day-year date format in citations for her articles. Using "From 10 to 16 November 2025" instead of "November 10-16, 2025" DOES NOT adhere to this particular guideline.
• Changing "language=" to "lang=" in the citation was also intentional. Notice in Wikipedia:Citation templates they use "language=" instead of "lang=".
• The one you should be reporting is yourself when you were called out for your misguided editing, but you insisted otherwise, which is disruptive. The bot saved the orphaned sources from your edits, so don't claim you corrected them yourself when you didn't.
• Please do not fix something that isn't incorrect. Thank you.

143kittypurry (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, but I get the impression that you're nitpicking about completely irrelevant things. Let me explain.

• Regarding the first point – this is precisely why not including the word ‘Airplay’ in the table is misleading and suggests that the chart is sales and streaming, when clearly it is not. In this case, I believe that I have nothing to reproach myself for. Removing the word Airplay is misleading.
• About the second point - ‘The cited sources do not specify a publication date’ - which does not change the fact that I monitor these quotations every week and see that they are updated on that exact day. Since I have this knowledge and it is publicly available (you just need to go there and notice it), it can be added so that the source has
• About the third point - How is this a mistranslation? Do you see any Spanish-language songs on this chart? Or any songs that are 100% in Spanish? NO, this chart only includes songs in English, or songs that are at least mostly in English. No, it is not a mistranslation. It perfectly reflects what this chart is - accusing me of creating my own translation in this case is unfounded and unfair. ‘The accurate translation is also “10–16 November”, not “From 10 to 16 November”.’ - On what basis? Your own. Monitor Latino itself refers to it as ‘Del 10 al 16 de Noviembre, 2025’, which corresponds exactly to my translation, not yours.
• About the fourth point - ‘Katy Perry is American’ - what relevance does that have in terms of this source? The title is translated from the text which is on the website in the top right corner. If you want to create a completely different title based on your own interpretation, instead of using the one on the website, then I could accuse you of using your own translation. It is basically their own title rewritten in English.
• About the fifth point - both are correct. Both work and slightly shorten the length of the ref, don't do any harm to the ref, so in my opinion you're just looking for something to complain about because you can't get over the fact that I slightly corrected your messy reference.
• About the sixth point - Now you are totally disrespectful. You make messy edits, delete fixes, and deliberately distort reality. Instead of desperately looking for ways to insult me, maybe just look at the fact that in the edit you refer to, minute later I quickly corrected an accidental orphan that resulted from the mess you made in the article by putting the sources at the top of the page instead of next to the table.

To summarise, continue and I will simply report you. If you still intend to revert and insult me, you leave me no choice.

@143kittypurry Szyign (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

• Monitor Latino, by default, is an airplay chart. My intention in including it in the charts table wasn't to present it as the main chart, when I didn't include the term "airplay." Your ongoing accusations are misplaced. I've already added the word "airplay" in the table for clarity, so I recommend stepping back from this accusation.
• When you access the source and use the translation feature in any browser, it generates "November 10-16, 2025," not "From 10 to 16 November 2025" as you suggest. Also, you repeatedly mistranslated "Anglo" as "English" when it is not necessary, as it's already in English and part of the chart's name. Keep in mind that the month-day-year (MDY) date format in citations is standard for American citizens, such as Katy Perry, and all articles written under her name; we should adhere to this format.
• It's also unnecessary to change "language=" to "lang=" when the former is the correct citation format. The shortened term comes off as lazy and doesn't improve the citation, which is already correct. Also, my "messy citations" you are referring to include archived versions of sources, which you deliberately removed, as well as several "ref name=". Now, who among us is disruptive and messy?
• Where have I been disrespectful? I've said "please" multiple times, but you seem unwilling to accept feedback or corrections to your edits and just throw endless accusations. Your talk page shows a history of disruptive editing and other chart-related issues. Now I know why. I suggest revisiting the Wiki guidelines to avoid further mistakes.
• Feel free to report me if you wish, but your actions speak louder than your threats.

143kittypurry (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

• Regarding the first point – great, I'm glad you understood that. Earlier, you deleted "Airplay" from the table, which is why I emphasised it, because it was misleading.
• ‘When you access the source and use the translation feature in any browser, it generates “10-16 November 2025”.’ Please don't rely solely on what Google Translate comes up with. Just look at the fact that ‘del’ is ‘from’ in English, and “al” is ‘to’. Just because the translator gives you a different result does not mean that it is the only correct version. Especially since I verified my answer in Deepl's translator and it does not give me 10-16 November, so it is not true that every translator gives the same result as yours.
• "Also, you repeatedly mistranslated ‘Anglo’ as ‘English’" - no, I already explained that above. I deliberately translated it only in the reference so that it would be clear to an uninformed reader that ‘Anglo’ means ‘English’, but I am not changing Anglo to English in the table itself, because, as you say, it is the name of the listing, so Anglo actually makes more sense there. ‘We should adhere to this format’ - well, that's already been done, you have it in access-date and date, it should indeed be there, but in the case of the translated title, I don't base it on whether Katy Perry is from America or China, but on what is in the original source, which does not come from America. Using the argument that the dates of a foreign source, which they themselves put in the title, should be changed to please American citizens is absurd to me.
• " shortened term comes off as lazy and doesn't improve the citation" - not at all, it just simplifies the ref and shortens it where possible without affecting the ref's functionality. I think nitpicking about this is just looking for random "issue" to revert, and really, you should stop complaining about such an insignificant thing. It's not even visible or interfering with the experience of a random user.
• ‘archived versions of sources, which you deliberately removed’ - since you yourself say that "you recommend me stepping back from this accusation. ", then why are you still doing it yourself? In the first edition, yes, I removed it, because the bot adds the archive later automatically, so I decided that I didn't need to waste time correcting the entire reference for you, since this source has been working for many years and does not seem to be going to become unavailable. However, when you pointed out that I had deleted it, I added it back later and never removed it again, so I recommend you recommend stepping back from this accusation.
• ‘Now, who among us is disruptive and messy?’ - still you, because you put the references with refname in the upper section, not in the table section, so when I wanted to correct them later, they became orphans, because you arranged them so strangely that I had to use Ctrl + F to find where you had written them. It should be in the table so that it's easier to find than in a ton of text at the top.

Your whole attitude is disrespectful, and you are acting aggressively over completely irrelevant issues that do not detract from the article. You reject anything that you do not like even slightly. ‘You seem unwilling to accept feedback or corrections to your edits and just throw endless accusations’ - I can say exactly the same thing about you. Szyign (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add multiple charts like Romanian Airplay from TopHit, which is NOT an official provider for Romania. As we've already got the official chart provider for Romania listed at 'The Fate of Ophelia', so we don't need it duplicated. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 00:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I mean, I've added Airplay chart for Romania in The Fate of Ophelia because Billboard one is only a streaming and digital download-based chart, so both charts represent two different markets - just like in the case of Poland and South Africa... Szyign (talk) 23:28, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

There was discussion at WP:RECORDCHARTS that while multiple charts might exist, we should stick to the national chart provider instead of using things like Billboard or other aggregate providers like TopHit (which I have questioned the authenticity of). You have been reverted and the content removed multiple times. Other editors have also reverted you on some of your chart editions. Please read WP:BRD. Your content was removed, therefore the onus (responsibility) is on you to get a WP:CONSENSUS and discuss before readding content which has been removed. Many of the countries you are adding additional charts for are very small countries that relatively have very little if at all miniscule share of the overall global music market. It simply does not make sense to have multiple charts for such countries. WP:INDISCRIMINATE also applies. Please review this message carefully and get a discussion consensus before repeatedly adding content which has been removed.

On side note, please avoid TopHit for countries where it is not the authorised provider (e.g. outside of Russia and neighbouring countries) for this reason. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 18:53, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

makes zero sense but sure Szyign (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Which bit makes zero sense?

• WP:BRD exists to prevent the exact editing you have engaged in which is ignoring established consensus/norms and prevents two or more editors from disrupting an article with constantly adding and removing the same content.
• Re: Billboard Hits of the World charts - Billboard is most known as the US chart provider. In countries like Romania, the main charts are: Romanian Top 100 (1996–2012), Airplay 100 (2012–2021), UPFR (2008–2011, since 2021), Media Forest (since 2009), Romania Songs (since 2022), most of these come from the Romanian record charts company. These are the charts most well known in Romania. Outside of the country, yes Billboard is well known but TopHit isn't well known as editors have raised concerns over is accuracy as well as how it tabulates charts as its not clear what is or isn't included or what independent verification there is. Where a country is small and there is only a small radio industry (handful of stations), there is no need for multiple charts. Just because info exists, doesn't mean it has to be on wikipedia, that's what WP:INDISCRIMINATE stands for.

Either way, some of these articles are getting stupidly long to read and navigate because people insist on every single chart, sometimes ignoring the accuracy or validity. Ultimately Wikipedia is a place for fact and having multiple charts, even from reputable publishers where there's already an established national provider is unnecessary.

That said, if you disagree, you're welcome to start a discussion. We go with WP:CONSENSUS. However, across all articles, please consider stopping adding endless charts. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 21:30, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Not gonna lie, I've had at least a few discussions with you in the past, and they always ended with you completely rejecting the possibility of understanding my side, just as now. I always feel shouted down, misunderstood, and treated like some kind of vandalist, when the truth is that I want to do good. This does not encourage me to engage in further discussions with you, because I am simply afraid of you. That's why I started to doubt that it would ever be possible to reach an agreement with you. When I asked about the alleged link to fan voting in the Israeli charts, you deliberately ignored me. At least that's the impression I got, because I never received a response.

As for the Romanian charts, great, but since 2021 there haven't been any charts that go beyond the Top 10, or the Top 25 in the case of Billboard (which is again - streaming based chart, not airplay). I use TopHit as a substitute for lower positions for Airplay, and when a song appears on UPFR or Media Forest, I immediately replace it with one of these two, and most often with both, for consistency. This is simply due to the fact that there are currently no Romanian charts for positions below the Top 10, except for TopHit. Their charts regularly overlap with UPFR and Media Forest, so I doubt their unreliability.

"editors have raised concerns over is accuracy as well as how it tabulates charts as its not clear" - Sorry, but I've only heard this opinion from you. When I pointed out their methodology to you, you started theorizing that you don't trust them anyway, so their charts are definitely unsuitable for Wikipedia. Sorry, but the world doesn't revolve around you. There is a well-described methodology for their charts, which I already linked to you on recordscharts, but again, I feel that it's not getting through to you.

"Where a country is small and there is only a small radio industry (handful of stations), there is no need for multiple charts" - sure, but you regularly remove airplay and streaming charts for example for Mexico, Peru, Colombia, etc., which are not small countries at all. They have millions in population, more than some countries that are treated better just because they are Western countries.

"getting stupidly long" - and that's a reason to remove correct charts representing radio and streaming (two completely different markets) because something is too long? Following this line of thinking, you should remove 10 Billboard charts for the US on worldcharts singles, because that also lengthens the article, and they are not main charts. Eh, I don't understand this logic.

" if you disagree, you're welcome to start a discussion" - to be honest, you made me doubt that this is how it works here. When I did engage in many discussions, you jumped on me, shouted in capslock, and generally made me feel intimidated into not violating your rules, which in my opinion are detrimental to the accuracy of these charts and do not correctly represent many countries that do not have main combined charts, but have two charts: airplay + streaming.

If u want to discuss normally, without being agressive - sure, i'm here to talk. But as of now i'm afaid of you, really. You have on your talk page banner with "be kind" - I agree with that, but i'm not feeling like you are. Sorry to say that Szyign (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

If you can point out where I'm aggressive? There is such a thing as assuming good faith and you really haven't with me at all. At no point have I ever said you are a vandal, except where you have repeatedly ignored requests from myself and others about charts. I've not said anything disparaging about you, simply asking you to stop making incorrect edits. Even if you are correct, repeatedly adding and re-adding content that has been removed is vandalous and disruptive. I've invited you to start a discussion at WP:RECORDCHARTS, that's not a page run by me, I'm not the ruler and high commander or anything like that. When two editors cannot agree, or there isn't a clear answer, its always a good idea to discuss with others and get a consensus based on what the community thinks. It's got nothing to do with what I think, I am merely editing in line with the current rules. I have previously typed in capitals because I have tried to emphasis points you do not agree with or simply do not listen to.

In case its not clear, please allow me to explain several points:

• Where a country has an established chart provider e.g. AGATA in Lithuania, we have an established norm and tradition to use the charts listed at WP:GOODCHARTS. Even though Billboard publishes many charts for many countries, Billboard is not well known in Lithuania for producing charts. Therefore we would only use the Billboard chart for a country like Lithuania if the song did not chart on Agata.
• There is no bias towards Western countries. Japan and South Korea are two of the biggest markets so the suggestion that there is bias is rubbish.
• There is proportionality - where there are multiple charts but there is an established national chart there has to be a valid reason for including more than one chart.
• I am not the only user who has called you out about this, others have asked you to stop too like Ss112.
• I am sorry if you feel like you've been aggressively spoken to or targeted.
• I have only removed Latin Countries sourced from Radio Monitor because users have called into question those charts. Others I have removed have been Suriname and San Marino because of WP:SINGLEVENDOR.
• I have tried many times to engage with you, but it is frustrating when you have ignored all efforts and attempts to invite you to get a WP:CONSENSUS and when you have been reverted but continue to add the content on multiple articles.
• If you disagree with the chart rules, things are done by consensus. I would strongly encourage you to open a discussion at WP:RECORDCHARTS - many people will likely comment. There are also existing discussions there you can refer to for specific charts and countries.

Overall where you have lost favour, is where you've been linked to discussions or one person has asked you to stop something, and you've continued to add it in another article anyway. Please stop referring to them as my rules, they're not. They're listed at WP:RECORDCHARTS and its discussion page.

It's also not my concept of "stupidly long", its listed at WP:INDISCRIMINATE, which is a page developed by the community (existing long before I became an editor) about the excessive nature of some articles and topics. Not all information because it exists should be included. You will notice for example that even at something like discography pages, we list charts to 10 because it becomes hard to read and navigate. Please read my comments rationally and reconsider what I have tried to say all along and let's agree to try and be calmer and more civil with each other. You spend a lot of time updating chart positions and this is helpful and welcome. You're a good editor at heart and I'm sorry if you've felt overwhelmed or intimidated. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 01:57, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

It's good to hear that you've changed your tone... in that case, we can definitely talk, and I'll be happy to address all your concerns. Of course, I apologise if I was also negative towards you at times; it was a kind of defence mechanism when I felt attacked. I'll try to be more careful about that.

• About AGATA – indeed, you may be right, in this case AGATA covers both airplay and streaming, so airplay from TopHit does not seem to make much sense. I will try to avoid this in future.
• "There is no bias towards Western countries" - well, I get that impression, because countries such as the US, NL, UK, and others often have several entries in the chart - often not even the main ones - when at the same time it's a problem that a country with a population of for example 30 million cannot have two spots for airplay and streaming (which, in my opinion, are completely different, and it cannot be said that 100% streaming charts reflect what 100% airplay charts have, and vice versa), just because it is a country in Latin America or Eastern Europe. Okay, a country like El Salvador is not important, but what about Mexico or Peru? There are also a lot of people living there, and the numbers on Monitor Latino in terms of plays are counted in the hundreds, not the tens..
• there has to be a valid reason - and I think there is. For example, look at the Argentine chart for The Fate of Ophelia—okay, it reached #4 on the Billboard chart, which I understand is combined with streaming and airplay, but it climbed to #1 on the general chart of Airplay Monitor Latino, not just the English-language section, both overall one. Consequently, by removing Airplay from the number-one singles in Argentina category, it looks like it was added by mistake, when it wasn't. On the other hand, removing the Argentine Billboard chart also doesn't make sense to me, because it represents both markets at the same time... you get it?
• As for Ss112, yes, he wrote to me... but the last time was in 2023 about incorrect charts. I listened to him and stopped adding them, although I personally think it's a mistake not to include Radiomonitor, because countries such as South Africa and Latvia openly confirm on their official charts websites that they use data from Radiomonitor to create their charts. And indeed, when you compare them, they are 99% consistent (sometimes I see a difference of one place, but that's probably a statistical error). But anyway, someone once reached a consensus and the issue got stuck in a deadlock, and I don't have the energy to argue about it, so I let it go. Nevertheless, I care about updating the tophit and monitor latino charts, so I want to clarify any doubts and continue doing so. I devote a lot of time to this and I believe that these charts are not flawed in any way, their methodology is clear... and there is evidence of this on their websites, as I've proved before in our discussions.
• "I have only removed Latin Countries sourced from Radio Monitor" - I'm afraid you've got something wrong here, because I never added radiomonitor charts from Latin America, only monitor latino, which is pretty clear and reliable. I haven't added radiomonitor for two years now, I gave it up completely because it was impossible to agree on it with others. And yeah - same goes with Suriname and San Marino. I don't agree with that consensus, but i gave up on them and i'm not adding them for like 2 years now.

so yeah, we can work it out, i'm willing to work on that. my current priorities are tophit and monitor latino, so i'm working on that mainly. as i said, i gave up on radiomonitor, suriname and san marino Szyign (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I saw you added the Israel International TV airplay chart on Bandaids page. I noticed that the song it's charting also in the International "Home" chart; what does that refer to? (all radios excluding TV?), should we add that too since it is a separate chart? Thank you :) Michael Igol (talk) 11:27, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

@Michael Igol Hello! I took a closer look at this, and from what I can tell, the "International Home" chart does not appear to be a non-TV airplay chart. It does not match the official airplay chart published by Media Forest here: https://mediaforest-group.com/weekly_charts.html#!#menu2.

I also don’t see an indication that this could for example represent a different airplay week. When clicking the blank option located above “Home,” it displays a Top 5 that fully matches the official airplay data from the link above, so it seems that "Home" can't be an Airplay chart.

Additionally, the "Home International" chart itself states that the highest number of plays came from MTV Israel, and that the song was played on two channels in total, which strongly suggests to me that this chart is still somehow based on TV airplay. It seems to be some form of TV airplay chart, but with slightly different data or methodology than the one explicitly labeled as "TV"?

Because it’s unclear what this chart actually represents and how it differs in a verifiable way, I think it’s safer not to add it. In my opinion, it’s difficult to reliably determine what this chart measures, so I would avoid including it for now :)

Have a nice day! Szyign (talk) 11:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I agree, thank you so much for your reply :) Michael Igol (talk) 11:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

is she part of the Russian spy payments network called TGR ? ~2025-42296-13 (talk) 03:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10269916/officers ~2025-42296-13 (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Seven (Jung Kook song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:27, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your work in adding peak chart positions to music articles! RedShellMomentum 04:31, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much!! Means a lot to be visible doing this hard work :) Szyign (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I've noticed that in a lot of tables, you add a new row (|-) before the end of the table, after the last chart listed, like after the Venezuela Anglo chart you added here. There is no need to add this. Thanks. Skyversay (talk) 14:19, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Sorry! Szyign (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Raindance (song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:29, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Think About Us (Sonny Fodera song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Camilasdandelions. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dernière danse, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 01:06, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

I wanted to say thank you for how you update chart placements. It's not easy and I appreciate it! orangesclub 🍊 17:50, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! It really means a lot to me :)! Szyign (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! When you are changing Mexico Ingles Airplay links (e.g. this edit), please remember that [[Billboard]] links to an article about large advertising signs. Instead, you could use [[Billboard (magazine)|''Billboard'']] to provide a link to the music publication. Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Oh,okay! Sorry Szyign (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page House Money, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Casino (song), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Birds & the Bees, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)