User talk:Taxarhorane

until know i dont have a reason to believe why you refused my contact it took me a lot of hard work this is unacceptable your statement is not clear please review it back Taxarhorane (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft has been deleted because it was unambiguously promotional. It will not be reviewed further, because reviewers cannot review deleted content.

Furthermore, you are lying to us by claiming "it took me a lot of hard work." No, it didn't. An AI chatbot wrote that for you. You didn't put any work into it at all. You failed to review the content for neutrality and the sourcing for accuracy, and you failed to correct the LLM formatting.

You are welcome to start again, not relying on an AI, writing in your own words, in a neutral manner. Writing a Wikipedia article is the most difficult task one can do here. If you think you can do it just starting out, without practicing improving other articles, then you're sadly mistaken. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 19:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

can you help me then, i already know my mistake i didnot look deeper it my first time been there and i belieave i can do better Taxarhorane (talk) 07:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

The best thing for you to do is not attempt to write an article as your first task here, but find other ways to improve the encyclopedia. Find topics that interest you, improve them, add citations to reliable sources, and avoid using an AI chatbot. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 08:13, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read and apply MOS:HEAD before any resubmission

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Taxarhorane/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 15:19, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Until I did not understand anything, may one of you have to say you draft did not been accepted because of that and that and that.

i thought i did great work i even follow instruction about some individuals in you tube.

the thing i nned to know is, is it the way i prepred the article or the story i mention does not have meaning and so on Taxarhorane (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abshir Abdi Jama Mohamed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:23, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

can you help me and tell me what changes i should make please Taxarhorane (talk) 16:26, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

It needs some grammar/wording fixes. Also, look at MOS:HEAD to help with fixing the headers. There needs to be more inline citations as well. See WP:INLINE. Once you take care of all of that, you can resubmit it. Ktkvtsh (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

please check know Taxarhorane (talk) 17:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I think it still needs more sources to show notability. You are welcome to resubmit it for review whenever you please. On most articles, I only review once. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:27, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

yeh, but there is no mega sources all those i used was my local resources they are not globally famous but inside the community they are reliable, also i was wandering as long as the story is all there may you try to help if there is something else required for the Wikipedia submission. please Taxarhorane (talk) 10:06, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

If you cannot find enough good sources, then an article is not possible. You might have better luck at the Wikipedia version that is in your native language. David10244 (talk) 03:42, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

take look now, i did not give up yet. this time is more well Taxarhorane (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

check it if its okay Taxarhorane (talk) 07:43, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, for info - images in infoboxes do not require the [[File:xxx]] formatting for images - instead, they're designed to accept simply the name of the image, eg. image = myImage.jpg Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:39, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

thanks for reminding, so there was an article i wrote about person and until know there in no reply on it, could you please check it body. Taxarhorane (talk) 08:44, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Er what Danners430 _{tweaks made} 09:56, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

could someone please check my article nad look it up if its been accepted or not i haven't received any feedback until know. Taxarhorane (talk) 08:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abshir Abdi Jama, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:33, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adolphus79. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Osman Mohamoud (clan), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Adolphus79 (talk) 15:00, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abshir Abdi Jama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 January 2026 (UTC)