User talk:TechEditor117

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit filter hits

"Livpure" was what triggered the filter; that company abusively spammed Wikipedia which is why it's included in one of our filters. If you omit that reference, the edit should go through. In the future if you get an edit filter hit that you believe is a false positive, you can post to WP:EFFP but you don't need to cross-post it anywhere else. OhNoitsJamie Talk 12:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you very much. IT WORKED!! TechEditor117 (talk) 04:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Regarding your draft

@TechEditor117 You would do well to read WP:BOSS and WP:BACKWARD. Writing an article about your own company is generally doomed to failure in general; but doubly so if your approach is to first write the draft based on what you know and then try to add sources later.

In order for your company to have an article on Wikipedia, you need to demonstrate that it meets the requirements at WP:NCORP. You need references for that, and you should start by finding the references, not by writing the draft. Athanelar (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Athanelar! I have collected valid references. The problem I faced was, I was unable to submit the article even for review. TechEditor117 (talk) 04:25, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
I said the above because I saw your draft at a time when you had already written a large amount of content but had not yet provided a single reference, which indicated to me you were writing the article WP:BACKWARDS. Athanelar (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent RO Systems (April 23)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Athanelar, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.
A Wikipedia article should be a neutral summary of what the majority of people who are wholly unconnected with the subject have independently chosen to publish about the subject in reliable publications, (see Golden rule) and not much else. What you know (or anybody else knows) about the subject is not relevant except where it can be verified from a reliable published source. As it stands, this draft is clearly the company telling us what it wants us to hear. Read WP:BOSS and share it with your superiors/colleagues..

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Kent RO Systems to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Athanelar (talk) 13:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, TechEditor117! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Athanelar (talk) 13:09, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello TechEditor117! The thread you created at the Teahouse, New editor blocked by automated filter while saving sandbox draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:05, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent RO Systems (April 27)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
See WP:SIRS and the section on corporate trivia, the sourcing is largely in that category - IPO, funding, investment plans, listings. What is required is corporate depth, see specification in the section above trivia.

There is also some signs of AI usage here, which is not allowed.

Do not remove previous AFC logging information, which is also an LLM trait. If the line says "do not remove this line", that means that you should not remove that line.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Kent RO Systems to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI