User talk:Techgamer534
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 2025
Hello, I'm Rusty Cat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lee Su-jeong without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Rusty meow ~ 17:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haechan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Haechan, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hearts2Hearts. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:07, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Taran Noah Smith. Why did you change a direct quotation? DonIago (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ghetto Girls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fromis 9. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. — 🎄☃️ Paper9oll ☃️🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 13:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manon Bannerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. I have corrected it. Thank you for your advice. Techgamer534 (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
WARNING regarding introduction of unsourced and poorly sourced content
Techgamer534, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Recently, you have been repeatedly reinserting material at Wonhee with citations to unreliable self-published sources (here and here) like iMDB and Fandom (kpopwiki). You have been warned several times about this, so I want to give you fair warning: if you add unsourced or poorly sourced content again at Wonhee, or at any article at Wikipedia, I will start a discussion at the administrator's noticeboard about your editing and seek to have your editing privileges suspended in order to protect the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you disagree, or if you have any doubts about what constitutes reliable sourcing or what this means, please contact the Wikipedia:Teahouse or WP:Help desk. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Wonhee moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Wonhee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Illit-related reporting, including routine and/or trivial information that is derivative and/or contextually driven. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Asa (Japanese singer) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Asa (Japanese singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Babymonster-related reporting, including routine and/or trivial information that is derivative and/or contextually driven. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonhee (singer) (January 4)

- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonhee (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Techgamer534!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC) |
January 2026
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:13, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Nmixx. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:28, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary again, as you did at Aespa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Pentagon (South Korean band). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Skiendiel has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nighfidelity (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae (April 16)

- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sullyoon (April 16)

- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sullyoon to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae (April 17)

- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
