User talk:Tetsuo

I removed your edit from this page because the links you provided are badly formed. Can you correct the links and add the information back? Thanks! --Mdwyer 03:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

A study by Lee et al. published in 2006 indicated a strong link between blood serum levels of Persistent Organic Pollutants and diabetes.^[1]

I reverted your additions to aspartame. Those are medical news reports of a poster presentation that linked diet soda consumption to renal decline. The study did not distinguish those containing aspartame from those containing sucralose. I don't want to discourage you, but that leap from a preliminary study to one ingredient is beyond the scope of verifiability.Novangelis (talk) 20:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I just reverted same additions to Aspartame controversy. It would be better to wait until it is published in a peer-reviewed source before adding it in to any article (the most likely article where it would be relevant is diet sodas.Yobol (talk) 20:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The article Word Lens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable product

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:02, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Wiki news would be a good place for this sort of stuff... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:38, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

My main issue with the text in question is "seems not to be subject to the problem of resistance"

Extra ordinary claims require extra ordinary evidence. Thanks Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

We still need a secondary source such as a review article to support it. If stuff is too new one occasionally has to wait until such sources appear.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wojciech Rodek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wojciech Rodek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anbu121 (talk me) 18:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Tetsuo, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 00:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Wojciech Rodek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polish, City Island and Get Low (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metro Morning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kitchener (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Temperance (group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queer As Folk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dental composite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amalgam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Video card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EVGA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Borodin Trio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laszlo Varga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BBK Electronics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chang'an Town. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of multinational festivals and holidays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Longest Night. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to BlackBerry Messenger, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Dodi 8238 (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Roy Newsome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 15:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tetsuo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

inadvertent or unintended block possibly pertaining to some other user of IP address on mobile network. I (user Tetsuo) have done one edit in last 60 days, a minor grammatical correction. Tetsuo (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; you are not blocked directly and need to provide your IP address for us to take a look and find the block. Yamla (talk) 21:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Message says: Editing from [IP address] has been blocked (disabled) by Yamaguchi先生 Tetsuo (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

What you are assuming is one thing I have known for years. I even had had it protected when Laura's wiki was perfect. Then early 2016 something happened, the protection was deleted and Laura's early days was changed back to 1957 and Brewster. I have been doing a research of Laura Branigan since spring 2014 and it ended yesterday, July 2. Laura's former neighbours in Armonk and old classmates from high school has helped very much in details so they are very happy to see the truth of their "Laurie", as she called herself from childhood until 1970, when she moved to New York. So their feedback has been very important. So I knew I was right about Laura's wiki. So when my wiki was deleted I decided to keep out from wiki. Sadly, when I was accused for lying and fabricating my research of one contributor (Devilmanozzy) I was back again in the war. He managed to erase all my sources, references, etc. I tried to convince him, but no. So then I stopped and walked out again. My feedbackers has all read it, and they are laughing. They also knows the true. Laura's biography and timeline was setup and written to suit a birth of 1957. But Brewster is a mystery. Why Brewster? Branigan's never lived in Brewster, they moved from Nassau County, Long Island to Armonk in Feb 1952. I have the purchase documents, which of course was declared as fabricated in photoshop. So all was so clear I was a liar and he was the best. Now when I say your input I felt I had to contact you. If you will change Laura back to 1952 and Mount Kisco I will support you. If I do anything it will be undone same second I press save. If you say yes to this I will provide you with sources and references as much as I can. Brand new since yesterday or old which has been deleted as "falses". How can you photoshop old digitized papers from the web? I have asked Devilmanozzy, but no answers. It is Laura's 64th birthday today (3/7), and she deserves a better wiki than it is. Thanks and greetings from Sweden--Born53 swe (talk) 08:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

After reading the latest comments of Laura's edit history, I am not interested any longer and prefer to stay outside. Thank you!--Born53 swe (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello Tetsuo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Stephen Walsh (professor) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 04:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of composers who died before age 50 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of composers who died before age 50 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Tetsuo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Young death".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 15:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Waterloo, Ontario, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:54, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Tetsuo. You wrote the following:

Moved from User talk:Mathglot § Link to French Wikipedia article in Émile Zola article

I've moved the discussion here, so you'll see my response, and be able to refer to it later if you wish to; it will eventually get archived on my Talk page and will become hard for you to locate. With respect to your comment, you are referring to two edits of yours at Émile Zola:

1. 00:56, 7 September 2022 in section § Death, with your edit summary of: "changed {{ill|Louis Grégori|fr}} to fr:Louis Grégori (to correct invalid link)"
2. 01:03, 7 September 2022, in the same section, with edit summary: "change link to Louis Grégori so "fr" doesn't appear"

Both of these edits were errors, so I reverted them and I'd like to explain why. I see that you have been here for many years, but have relatively few edits, so maybe you're not familiar with the Interlanguage link template, or recommended procedures for linking articles on other language wikipedias.

In your first edit, you removed a valid interlanguage link, replacing it with a direct link to French Wikipedia. Best practices call for using template {{interlanguage link}} (abbreviation: {{ill}}) to link to foreign wikipedias, and will create a red link to the English title for the article that does not exist yet here. First of all, there's nothing wrong with a WP:RED LINK; they are not "broken links", they are a good thing, and encourage users to click them and create new articles. Secondly, the bracketed, blue language links provide a link to another language (like French) or to multiple languages, where bilingual readers can find more information, and where bilingual editors can translate the article into English if they wish. (I've done this many dozens of times.) I reverted this edit, to restore the red link to the English title Louis Grégori.

In your second edit, you removed the ':fr' language prefix from the direct French link you created in the first edit, leaving a blue link which looks like it will go to an article on English Wikipedia, like this: Louis Grégori. Only, when you click it, it doesn't go to an English article at all, violating the principle of least astonishment (see also, Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Principle of least astonishment). So, I reverted that, too.

Before you got there, the code in that section was this: {{ill|Louis Grégori|fr}}, which generates this link: Louis Grégori [fr], and that is the way it should be in the article, and explains why I reverted your two edits.

Going forward, please do not remove or replace {{ill}} templates in articles, and please do not unlink red links in order to "fix" them. Both red links and interlanguage links are beneficial to the encyclopedia. Thanks, and I hope this explanation has been helpful to you. Mathglot (talk) 07:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

There is another version of this explanation at this guideline page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:54, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for taking the time to explain this and sorry for causing you unnecessary work. I was under the impression that red links are always to be avoided. As a new or infrequent Wikipedia reader, I would find it extremely confusing and unintuitive that I should have to click the "fr" to reach the link, but if that's the way Wikipedia editors feel it should be, so be it. Everything gets automatically translated these days, so perhaps Wikipedia should rethink the treatment of foreign links, or a bot should just put a translation of the linked article in the English language Wikipedia. Tetsuo (talk) 17:11, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Np. As far as "that's the way Wikipedia editors feel it should be", there are very few "rules" here that are cast in concrete; the rules change when Wikipedia editors are in agreement that they should change. You are welcome to make suggestions on how to improve Wikipedia, including procedures and templates. For the confusing "fr" link, you can add comments at Template talk:Interlanguage link. Some editors agree with you about red links; see this discussion which took place in May. You could add your views there, if you like, or start another discussion about it.

As far as automatically translating foreign articles, that has been discussed, too, more than once. I don't have a link handy for you, but you could start at WP:Translation and see if there's anything there about it, or try an Advanced search, searching the "Wikipedia" namespace. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 18:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for that information and those suggestions.Tetsuo (talk) 20:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just letting you know that I changed one of your edits as the wikipedia style is to not change link targets merely based on capitalisation. Only the visible text needs to be changed. Furthermore wikipedia pages start with capitals in any case. Biofase ^flame| stalk  12:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:North East MRT line were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

The article Boyfriend Maker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable at all, not encyclopedic, excessive references to primary sources- relevant maintenance tag(s) are nearly a decade old, and issue has not been corrected.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SurferSquall (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to David Hertzog Dessites. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it needs to be expanded. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 02:15, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, but I am not going to invest any more time on this article because I am not a subject matter expert. I just wanted to start this article so others, more knowledgeable in the field, could improve it. WP:IMPERFECT I think we can presume that if a director's film was selected for inclusion in the world's preeminent film festival, that the director meets Wikipedia's standards for notability, whether or not multiple citations are provided in the article at this point. WP:NEXIST I think it would be better to leave the article out there for others to improve. Tetsuo (talk) 04:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Tetsuo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Hertzog Dessites, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)