User talk:Tgkohn

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Charles Derry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Can you have a look at Talk:The opera corpus? There is a problem with the Pasatieri links. Regards. --Kleinzach 23:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

I just corrected the links (I think correctly) to refer to [name] (opera)|[name] though the cited page does not exist. Is this the right direction?Tgkohn (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Hey, the tract index article, which you created in September 2006 got listed in Wikipedia:Dusty articles on Nov 13th, 2010 as the article with the longest time since it was last edited. Just a little bit of notability fyi. --Rye1967 (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Savage (composer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Savage (composer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Influenza pandemic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Le baiser de la fée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Drew.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... When I visit a page of it.wikipedia.org, all the interface --that is, all the material displayed that is not part of the article-- is in Russian. This happens only when I visit it.wikipedia, and not when I visit de.wiki, fr.wiki, or other languages.

I have accessed it.wikipedia.org from my partner's computer (and, presumably from his account), and the interface displays in Italian. So obviously it is a setting I must have made.

I tried to address this many months ago. I found some responses from several people, but the statements they made were beyond my understanding of how to work in wikipedia.Tgkohn (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Tgkohn (talk) 05:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Well, that's... interesting.

If you go to https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciale:Preferenze what is selected in the box labeled "Язык интерфейса:"? If it's Russian, you should be able to change it to "it - italiano" and click the save button ("сохранить") at the bottom. 3mi1y (talk) 06:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

That was it! Thank you very much.

I have no idea at all how/when/why that may have been selected.

Now, once again, editing Wiki articles is much easier.

Tgkohn (talk) 06:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

No problem! (And also no idea how that might have happened; I assume you already thought of the usual thing where someone finds your computer unlocked and changes it as a joke.) 3mi1y (talk) 06:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 in classical music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Keane and Juan Arroyo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Corrected in two subsequent edits. Tgkohn (talk) 08:41, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2017 in classical music

added links pointing to Andy Scott and John Barber

2020 in classical music

added a link pointing to David Taylor

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

The two links in '2017 in classical music' were corrected on 3 March. The link in '2020 in classical music' was corrected on 3 March. Tgkohn (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! This is just a note that I have unfortunately had to remove some content from your draft at Draft:Joel Thompson (composer), as it seems to have been copied from https://durhamsymphony.org/joel-thompson/ without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. It looks like you probably just copied this text to refer to while working on your draft, but unfortunately Wikipedia is not able to host copyrighted content anywhere on the site, including in draft space. If you want to refer to this text in writing your draft you might find it helpful to work offline in a text editor first to avoid pasting directly from sources into Wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding, and happy editing! MCE89 (talk) 12:03, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for "catching" this so quickly. I must misunderstand how articles identified as 'Draft" work. I mistakenly believed that such pages were exempted from bot review.

I also don't understand yet how to get a "Draft" article to become fully published.

Tgkohn (talk) 05:03, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Tgkohn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joel Thompson (composer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. Please remember to assume good faith and not make accusations towards others, as you did here. My edit was neither "malicious" nor "uninformed". I was quite clear in why I removed it here - it was entirely unsourced. This is unacceptable per WP:V and WP:VNT.

While it is possible to get it added back, you'll need to adhere to WP:V and WP:BURDEN. That is, if you want to re-add information, then you need to go through the work in finding reliable sources that verify the content.

It is not acceptable to add/re-add unsourced content to Wikipedia. Content requiring sources for verification purposes is one of the main points of how Wikipedia works. Do not add/re-add unsourced content to Wikipedia any more. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 13:14, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Tgkohn,

Just leaving you a note as this draft is due to be deleted via CSD G13. Since you are not the article creator, you are unlikely to receive a note about this but I saw that you requested this draft's restoration at WP:REFUND so I thought you might be interested in knowing about this upcoming deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)