User talk:TheRichic

Welcome!

More information Getting Started, Getting Help ...

Hello, TheRichic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 09:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Close

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrimonio Nacional, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Toledo and Cáceres. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. TheRichic, thanks for creating 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article could be improved by adding references for verification by the reader.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

TonyBallioni (talk) 16:55, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spokesperson of the Government of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partido Popular. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating President of the Constitutional Court of Spain, TheRichic!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating President of the Supreme Court of Spain, TheRichic!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article! In the future, please put the "See also" section before any references section. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating List of Presidents of the Supreme Court of Spain, TheRichic!

Wikipedia editor Elliot321 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating this useful article! In the future, please make sure that all text you add to the article is in English, instead of Spanish.

To reply, leave a comment on Elliot321's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Elliot321 (talk) 15:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. TheRichic, thanks for creating Consuelo Madrigal!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page is a translation of es:Consuelo Madrigal, which should be attributed properly. Please see Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Translating_from_other_language_Wikimedia_projects for instructions. I also noticed a couple of errors in the translation that I'm not going to attempt to fix, since I don't speak Spanish well enough to do so, although it seems obvious that" to occupe this position" should probably be "to occupy the position". Others are not so obvious. I have no idea what "she sworn her charge" means for example; does it mean to "take office"? Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 10:46, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Public Administration of Spain, TheRichic!

Wikipedia editor Usernamekiran just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If possible, kindly add at least one source in English language.

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—usernamekiran(talk) 11:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Joint Cyber-Defence Command, TheRichic!

Wikipedia editor Ifnord just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It would be helpful if you indicated which country (I am assuming Spain) this deals with.

To reply, leave a comment on Ifnord's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ifnord (talk) 00:54, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Official Credit Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ico.es/en/web/ico_en/what-ico-is. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I just stumbled across several of the articles you've created on cabinets in Spain. Please, please go back through the aritcle you've created and add a reference to where you found the information you're writing here. I'm looking in particular at 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, 2nd Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, and Third Suárez Cabinet, but I'm guessing there are many more. If you need help formatting references just post here and I'm happy to help. Thanks in advance. Ajpolino (talk) 19:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello!

I noticed that you reverted my recent edit on Lionel Messi's article few days ago. I wanted to remind you that the nationality of the footballers has been the subject to many discussions on WikiProject Football. That's the reason why I linked the editing manual on players' articles to my edit. There you can find links to these exact discussions.

The current general consensus among editors is that the nationality of the players should be the same as the national team she/he represents, even if the player has a dual nationality which is the case by Lionel Messi.

Thank you and take care! --Saksapoiss (talk) 15:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

This is an answer to the section you wrote in my talk page: User_talk:Filiprino#Vandalism_warning. Legal aspects do not serve as a way to define someone as catalan or spanish. For instance, in Spanish Wikipedia Catalan toponyms are written in Castilian Spanish, not in Catalan which is the official naming scheme. Moreover, science, not politics, is what is used to write articles in Wikipedia. Read this article, please: . Also, you seem to have a conflict of interest, from your user page: This user is a Monarchist. This user is a member of WikiProject Spain. This user is interested in Spanish history. This user lives in Spain. Este usuario tiene el español como lengua materna. You wrote in my userpage due to the article Jordi Borràs. He is Catalan for sure, Spanish we don't know. We should ask him if he thinks is Spanish. But you can't remove the fact he is Catalan and replace it with Spanish. You are negating his Catalan nationality as well as negating the plurinationality of Spain. These Wikipedia articles will give you insight: Spanish nationalism, Nationalities and regions of Spain, National and regional identity in Spain. But please, don't try to bring on an speedy deletion on article Jordi Borràs i Abelló. Also, it seems you are the one having problems with sources, in these three articles: 1st Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain, 2nd Government under the restored Monarchy of Spain and Third Suárez Cabinet. Also, I have to inform you that the page Societat Civil Catalana has been protected due to the blanking you applied to full sections of the page on top of other vandalisms made by WP:SPA accounts and WP:COI accounts. Filiprino (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solicitor General of Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Francisco Serrano and José Canalejas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please do not perform cut-and-paste moves as you did with Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation (Spain) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Spain). Attribution is a copyright requirement, even when copying within Wikipedia. If you want the article to be renamed by moving Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation (Spain) to Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Spain), you can request it at WP:RMTR if it is uncontroversial. If the title change is potentially controversial, you can start a requested move discussion by following the instructions at WP:RMCM. Bennv3771 (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi TheRichic. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in European War Office. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

I doubt that musiqueenligne.com is reliable too. Also, the article has considerable commentary, essay-like language, and awkward grammar. My impression is that it may have been quickly translated from somewhere else. I held off on tagging it, hoping that the unreliable source would be enough for you to review it all much more carefully. --Ronz (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, TheRichic. You have new messages at Obi2canibe's talk page.
Message added 19:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Obi2canibe (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://banana-soft.com/5-most-important-news-agencies-world?language=en, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Diannaa, I'm sorry to tell you that you are wrong. The information has been obtained from RTVE web, it's a direct translation from it and from the Agencia EFE official website. Possibly, that website that you mentioned also translated the same information. The info has been translated from the Spanish wikipedia and the sources has been revised. TheRichic (Messages here) 21:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, List of Ministers of Justice of Spain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:01, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Interministerial Committees.

User:Onel5969 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Secretary of State for Employment (Spain).

User:Cwmhiraeth while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

When you translate text from a foreign language Wikipedia you should provide attribution to the original authors in your edit summary and by adding a translation tag to the talk page, as I have done in this instance.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cwmhiraeth}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions, @Cwmhiraeth:, but the original author on the wikipedia in Spanish is me. I didn't know about the translation tag, thanks too.TheRichic (Messages here) 12:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

No harm done then! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Second Deputy Prime Minister of Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello TheRichic, you reverted my edit, why? See title Gonzalo Moliner. Regards --Serols (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, @Serols:, the complete name is Gonzalo Moliner Tamborero. Gonzalo is his name and Moliner and Tamborero are his first (paternal) and second (maternal) surnames. TheRichic (Messages here) 10:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Ministers of Justice of Spain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ministry of of Science, Innovation and Universities. Since you had some involvement with the Ministry of of Science, Innovation and Universities redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CNI Director. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#CNI Director until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:34, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of wedding guests of Prince Felipe and Letizia Ortiz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wedding guests of Prince Felipe and Letizia Ortiz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 17:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
[[User:TheRichic|TheRichic]] [[File:Escudo de España (mazonado).svg|12px]] ''<small>([[User talk:TheRichic|Messages here]])</small>

Fixed signature:
[[User:TheRichic|TheRichic]] [[File:Escudo de España (mazonado).svg|12px]] ''<small>([[User talk:TheRichic|Messages here]])</small>''

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TheRichic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Ministers of Justice of Spain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello. The country of origin of the series is Mexico. Also IMDB is considered an unreliable source per WP:IMDB. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 15:22, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:21, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TheRichic. Thank you for your work on Jaime Alfonsín. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello there

Please note that Dalí is universally known as Salvador Dalí in English and the info box is correct. I reverted your recent edits to this page which amounts to a copyright notice. The article already has the notice and a link to the Dalí foundation. I moved it to the Legacy section where it more logically belongs. I am sure there were more interesting things in his will than his copyright. Thank you. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello there. For the future, before removing some edits, talk first with the editor or open a topic in the discussion. You have no more criteria than other editors to judge is soemthing is relevant or not. That kind of actions may cause edit wars. Thanks. TheRichic (Messages here) 05:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Please be more careful when you mark edits as minor. This is not a minor edit because you added information about the counter-signature. This is not a minor edit because it changes the national / regional origin of a person. This is not a minor edit because you changed people's names. To quote the {{uw-minor}} warning template, '"Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word.' Thanks, and happy editing. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Your edit to Regulation of artificial intelligence has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. CC BY-NC 4.0 is not a compatible license. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I know that most of the time we've been using "Business" as a translator for "Empresa" here in Wikipedia, but it looks like it may not be quite accurate; both because "business" is not as wide in scope as "enterprise" (which connotes something more extensive and more far-reaching than just a business) and because sources do actually use "Enterprise" as a valid translation ( , etc.). Impru20^talk 12:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

The article Felipe VI you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Felipe VI for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Averageuntitleduser -- Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

I wanted to inquire why you reverted all my edits for links on certain Spanish writers? I don't want to start a revert war so I figured I would reach out first. I don't see any cause to make the changes you did. The reason I edited the links in such a way was to give the reader historical context into when these writers were born. Having an unlinked "Spain" does not do the same thing. I will revert these articles back to my edit but I want to hear your reasoning first in case there is something I am missing. Reaching out in good faith. Thanks. Tpwissaa (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

The information on the infobox is about the place where they were born, not about the historial period of a country. If you want to provide context, you can develop it in the article, not in the templates. You are free to reverse it, but I will do the same. If this is a topic that interests you a lot, I recommend you to open a topic in the village pump to discuss it and avoid editing wars. Greetings. TheRichic (Messages here) 12:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. Respectfully, your response does not make much sense to me. These men were born into historical eras where much of the time the state of their birth did not exist at the time of their death. The information I linked to was not superfluous. Infoboxes are supposed to be a quick guide for a person's biographical information. All I did was add links that highlighted the state they were born into or died in. Spain in 2024 is a different state than the one these men lived through. De-linking this information and just leaving "Spain" obscures the fact that the notion of what Spain is as a state has not been a consistent concept. If I were to reference someone born into the Ancien Regime in France who then died during the Second Republic and simply had "France" for both sets of information, this would be entirely misleading. Yes, it would be correct in the sense that both states were "France", however they were completely different systems with different conceptions of themselves. I am not trying to be condescending or combative, just explaining my reasoning. I will not get into an edit war, I just think you need to reevaluate your position. Tpwissaa (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

The reasoning that they are not the same country it is yours, it is not something generally accepted on Wikipedia. The fact that their political systems change does not necessarily change the country. In all the years I've been here, this is how it's done. As I said, to avoid conflicts and editing wars, open a topic for users to discuss whether we should put it in periods and not in countries, but do not make massive changes. Greetings. TheRichic (Messages here) 08:04, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I will leave it there. Thank you for the dialogue. No ill will on my end. Best. Tpwissaa (talk) 11:08, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, It seems as though we are going back down the road of you reverting my edits. We have been over this and I still do not accept your thinking with regards to this. However, I let it go with the links you previously did this to. It appears as though you are following my edits and reverting them. This is getting ridiculous. If you do not have a valid reason (such as incorrect information) there is absolutely no reason to continue. Please stop doing this. There is nothing more annoying than a wikipedia edit argument especially with someone stalking another person's edits. Thank you. Tpwissaa (talk) 17:29, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los hombres de Paco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antena 3.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

In Cristóbal Colón de Carvajal, 18th Duke of Veragua#Styles, you added Her Excellency The Duke of Veragua (I bolded the critical word). Presumably that pronoun is a typo? Tarl N. (discuss) 00:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Hi! Yes, it's a typo. I copied the paragraph from another similar (feminine) article and didn't change the pronoun. Thanks for letting me know! TheRichic (Messages here) 06:37, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Marquess of Jamaica. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 14:55, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minister of Foreign Affairs (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in La hija del mariachi (2025 TV series). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Episode count is only updated after a new episode is aired per template documentation. The show airs at 11pm time in Colombia, which is when the episode number can be updated. WP:FUTURE. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 17:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Spain), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. please review WP:EPONCAT before creating Eponymous categories ^SMason_Garrison 21:47, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi TheRichic. Thank you for your work on List of ambassadors of Spain to South Africa. Another editor, Lynch44, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lynch44}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lynch44 12:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

TheRichic,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Buenas tardes Ricardo,

Primero de todo, como muestra mínima de educación, te pediría encarecidamente responder en la discusión de la página inglesa de Pedro Fernandes de Castro, por lo menos, antes de efectuar cualquier cambio.

Ya que no lo haces allí, espero que puedas hacerlo aquí. Los principales problemas:

1) Problemas históricos. El adelantamiento de la frontera de Galicia y Murcia NUNCA EXISTIÓ. Tampoco lo hizo el de Andalucía. El Adelantamiento de la Frontera fue un cargo EXCLUSIVO, que se circunscribió al ámbito fronterizo de los dominios del rey de Castilla con Granada (principalmente). El adelantamiento, o, adelantamiento mayor, SIN AÑADIDOS, sí existió para Murcia y Galicia, si bien para el último es recomendable usar el termino galaico-portugués (adiantamento mor) con el que se dirigía la monarquía la práctica totalidad de las veces a los oficiales de este reino hasta la entrada de los Trastámara (cronológicamente posteriores al artículo en cuestión). Y forma propia del idioma del personaje histórico que lo ostenta.

2) El uso de terceros idiomas. Esto es desde ridículo a nivel histórico y del buen uso de Wikipedia (la que recomienda usar los nombres "naturales") a abiertamente gallegofobo. Y siento hablar así de claro. La página en cuestión se trata de la Wikipedia inglesa, no la española, y, el personaje en cuestión, es gallego, no español. Esté donde esté hoy Galicia, España no existía en el siglo XIV (y por favor, por rigor y seriedad, evitemos discursos chovinistas de que España existía desde los romanos, pues nada tiene que ver con la España castellana de hoy en día). En consecuencia, el idioma castellano o español, no pinta nada en el artículo fuera de los nombres propios y cargos que sean específicamente propios de este idioma (Fernando Díaz de Haro, por ejemplo). Por ponerte una situación paralela, espero que concuerdes conmigo en que, Felipe II de Francia, no debe aparecer bajo ningún concepto en la Wikipedia inglesa como "Felipe II de Francia", si no como "Philip II of France" o "Philippe II". La misma lógica aplica a los personajes de origen galaico-portugués en una página de Wikipedia inglesa. Negar esto es afirmar que esta lengua, sus hablantes y su memoria histórica son merecedores de menos respeto que los hablantes de francés, inglés o castellano. Me gustaría hacerte notar aquí como, en tu última revisión, has decidido que si bien aceptabas el sobrenombre de "o da Guerra" en su forma nativa, has decidido colocarlo por detrás de su traducción al castellano (lengua que como vimos, no tiene sentido de ser en el artículo). Esto no para de hacerme pensar que, por alguna razón, consideras la lengua gallega(-portuguesa) como secundaria o menos valiosa y digna que la castellana. Me gustaría pedirte que te replanteases esta postura de ser el caso.

3) Coherencia nominal. La corrupción de nombres propios al castellano de personajes no castellanos en una página inglesa está llegando a tal punto de ridículo, que, ni siquiera es consistente. Si vamos a corromper unos nombres propios, hagámoslo con todos. Lo que no puede ser es que algunos de los hijos del personaje en cuestión aparezcan con una deturpación castellana, mientras que otros (Álvaro Pires o Inês de Castro) aparezcan en formas nativas si bien contemporáneas (en este caso siguiendo la normativa portuguesa, más próxima al galaico-portugués medieval en la escrita).

4) La problemática de la corrupción o deturpación de nombres propios en artículos históricos. Esta práctica, muy extendida en la academia española, y que bebe directamente de ideologías anexas al supremacismo castellano, supone, no solo un problema a nivel de convivencia y respeto a la dignidad de comunidades enteras, si no a nivel del estudio historiográfico. Como imagino que ya sabrás es práctica comúnmente aplicada sobre nombres gallegos y catalanes. La estructura nominal medieval genera una amplia cantidad de individuos con el mismo nombre, patronímico y, en muchos casos oficio u origen. Esto lleva a que si se traducen nombres a lenguas extranjeras a los individuos, como hace la academia española (y españolista) nos encontremos quizás, con tres "Juan Rodríguez Panadero", uno en Burgos en 1379, otro en Barcelona en 1245 y otro en Compostela en 1306, facilitando confusiones innecesarias. Otra de las consecuencias que esta mala praxis acarrea, es la de imposibilitar estudios más profundos. Por ejemplo en una obra llamada "Galicia en el comercio marítimo medieval" la autora traduce al castellano los nombres de navíos e individuos, imposibilitando averiguar el origen de los navíos o sus capitanes y armadores, el porcentaje de embarcaciones de uno u otro lugar en determinados puertos etc. (afectando en este ejemplo concreto incluso a lenguas más respetadas por el españolismo como lo es el inglés). Además de esta práctica invisibilizar grupos étnicos y comunidades culturales de reconocimiento internacional, efectivamente robando o borrando su historia. Otro gran problema, cuando esta corrupción se aplica a nombres de lugares, es la imposibilidad de encontrar el lugar en cuestión. Más allá de tu nacionalismo evidente por la propia definición de tu perfil (y esto no pretendo que se lea como un insulto), no creo (o no quiero creer) que tengas mala fe al corromper los nombre propios gallegos, por lo que me gustaría invitarte a reflexionar sobre las consecuencias que esto trae para Galicia, su historia, cultura y gente, y, como esto puede ser visto e interpretado por los gallegos. Además de sí supone o no, una falta de respeto a esta comunidad humana. Simplemente imagina que se tradujesen al gallego o al francés los nombres de los reyes de Castilla en su página inglesa.

5) Sé que que Pardo Guevara, entre otros muchos historiadores españolistas, traducen los nombres propios. Como he explicado antes esto es una mala praxis del medievalismo español y es algo que deja su imagen internacional notablemente afeada. No creo que por que un puñado de historiadores que destaquen por su pobre metodología y rigor lo hagan, debamos replicar aquí el mismo error. De modo que, por favor, no utilices la traducción de nombres propios por estos historiadores como "fuente" de que el nombre debe escribirse en castellano, pues ni todos los historiadores los traducen, de hecho la mayoría no lo hacen (Sotto Mayor, también citado en el artículo), ni la corrupción de Guevara es el nombre original de estos personajes (con lo que a efectos prácticos nos estaríamos inventando individuos que nunca existieron). Te animo a sumergirte en recursos como el Corpus Xelmirez o el Gallaecia Monumenta Historica para profundizar en la onomástica gallega medieval.

6) Si bien ciertos títulos podríamos escribirlos en castellano, como el de adelantado de la frontera (por ser exclusivos de la monarquía, aparecer en esta lengua en las fuentes y ser de territorios o reinos castellanos), otros, que aplican a territorio, ciudades y gestiones gallegas en las que la corona poco o casi nada tenía que ver, como el de pertigueiro mor (pertiguero mayor en castellano) de Santiago deben mantenerse pues en la lengua o bien del artículo (inglés) o bien del personaje que lo ostenta (galaico-portugués), o, de ser el caso, en su forma dominante en las fuentes primarias (de lo que no hay ningún estudio estudio por lo obvio de su conclusión, pero, atendiendo al origen e idioma de las fuentes, puedes hacerte una idea de la respuesta).

Puede que ignores este mensaje como decides ignorar la discusión de la página de Wikipedia en cuestión (lo que no me deja de transmitir por tu parte un cierto desdén moral), sinceramente espero que no sea así. En caso de serlo, solo hacerte notar que para los dos es muy fácil restaurar versiones anteriores de Wikipedia entrando en un bucle sin sentido y sin fin. Por lo que te apremio a que mantengas conmigo una discusión educada y honesta sobre el tópico.

Un caluroso saludo, Miguel. Migdeub (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Buenas tardes @Migdeub. Entiendo tu punto de vista y preocupaciones, pero no estás añadiendo nada que demuestre tus afirmaciones. Si una institución existió o no, compete a los historiadores, no a nosotros. Por otra parte, puede ser que el nombre esté castellanizado, pero es el nombre que se ha utilizado en todas las lenguas de la Wikipedia (lo que facilita su búsqueda), incluida la portuguesa y gallega. Cambiarlo porque a ti no te guste, porque en algunos textos aparezca con su nombre en gallego/portugués u otro motivo, también puede ser un revisionismo histórico por tu parte. En cuanto a la traducción de nombres, yo tiendo a dejar los enlaces de la Wikipedia, es decir, puede ser que uno esté en gallego porque así se creo y otros en castellano porque el que la creo usó fuentes castellanas. También es probable que, como por aquel entonces formaba parte de la Corona castellana, muchas de las fuentes que han llegado a nuestros días estén en castellano, esto no es minimizar grupos étnicos ni nada parecido, no estamos nosotros aquí para salvar lenguas o pueblos, sino para contar historia. La historia de la persona está contada, si en su tiempo se llamaba Pedro o Pere, no es relevante para lo que hizo.

Si eres historiador y sabes sobre el tema, podrás encontrar las fuentes adecuadas para cambiar aquellos aspectos que consideres erróneos, pero si un usuario ha creado un artículo a partir de una fuente, no puedes simplemente cambiarlo todo porque a ti no te guste o consideres que está equivocado. Si insistes en actuar así, seguirás provocando encontronazos con otros usuarios. TheRichic (Messages here) 18:41, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Por cierto, he integrado tus preocupaciones cambiando algunos nombres, y tu insistes en hacer un revisionismo nominal de todos los personajes que hay en el artículo e imponer tu voluntad. Al final, volverá todo a su estado previo a que decidieras modificarlo todo y tus sugerencias se perderán del todo. Un saludo. TheRichic (Messages here) 18:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Vamos a ir por partes Ricardo. Y adelanto la importancia de una discusión honesta. Cosa que me parece, evitas.

1) "Si una institución existió o no, compete a los historiadores, no a nosotros." Sin entrar en debate sobre este argumento ni nuestras ocupaciones personales, ningún historiador habla del adelantamiento de la frontera de Galicia o Murcia. Si bien el adelantamiento de la frontera de Andalucía es un termino usado por conveniencia, pues muchos de sus territorios se encuentran en la moderna Andalucía, el nombre para esta institución es simplemente Adelantamiento de la Frontera.

Como habrás observado no hay ninguna cita en el artículo que respalde ningún adelantamiento de la frontera para Galicia. Así que como tu dices, no nos compete inventarnos instituciones. Como creo que podrás entender, por ponerte un ejemplo, el trabajo de un arqueólogo no consiste en buscar pruebas de que los alienígenas no construyeron las pirámides, consiste en investigar sobre la construcción de las pirámides. Lanzar afirmaciones evidentemente falsas (adelantamiento mayor de la frontera de Galicia), aunque sean veladas (que los gallegos no hablaban gallego - y por lo tanto sus nombres no eran gallegos, si no, curiosamente, castellanos) y pedir que sean tumbadas con evidencias es un ejercicio de desgaste y guerrilla dialéctica que sinceramente prefería evitar (no te va a conducir a ti a nada, ni a mí).

2) "porque en algunos textos aparezca con su nombre en gallego/portugués". Estos textos son todos los textos no castellanos y muchos textos castellanos. "Algunos" es un calificativo muy deshonesto aquí. Casi tanto como tildar de revisionismo histórico usar el nombre propio de un personaje en su propio idioma.

3) Dices que este cambio es "por que a mi me guste", asumo que no has leído el mensaje previo, donde se exponen razones de rigor histórico, honestidad intelectual, y respeto a la historia de una comunidad humana. Creo que estás reduciendo razones de mucho peso y significado en un espectro muy amplio, a un capricho personal.

4) "muchas de las fuentes que han llegado a nuestros días estén en castellano". Estaría bien que ciertas afirmaciones se realizasen con conocimiento de causa para evitar incurrir en falsedades, si bien entiendo por tu comentario que, no eres historiador y por lo tanto no cuentes con cierta base.

Las fuentes principales son la documentación notarial, en gallego-portugués, el "Livro das Linhagens" en gallego-portugués, las Crónicas de Fernão Lopes, en gallego-portugués. Ciertamente hay documentos en castellano que nos hablan de Pedro Fernandes, si bien estos son en comparativa la menor parte, ninguno, que yo conozca por lo menos, opera como fuente primaria en este contexto ni es contemporáneo del personaje, a diferencia de las fuentes galaico-portuguesas que han llegado a nuestros días (las ya mencionadas).

La corona castellana, como entiendo que sabrás, no era ni un estado nación, ni castellana. ¿Qué significa esto? La corona, un término contemporáneo que usamos por conveniencia es el conjunto de estados patrimoniales de un príncipe. Estos estados pueden ser de una diversa composición étnica e incluso legal, y sus cancillerías emitir documentación en una amplia variedad de lenguas (como hizo la Corona castellana). Nos referimos generalmente al conjunto de estados por tan solo uno de ellos, generalmente (no siempre) aquel en el que por lo general, descansaba la corona (es decir, el rey), que a veces tenía una cierta preminencia institucional, o aquel que tenía más antigüedad dentro de los dominios familiares del príncipe (el caso castellano). Que usemos solo el título de uno de estos estados (por conveniencia), no quiere decir que la documentación de la monarquía se emitiese en el idioma mayoritario o propio de este estado (como es el caso de la Corona de Aragón en el Reino de Aragón o la corona Galaico-Leonesa con el latín), ni que este tuviese una suerte de "idioma oficial".

5) "revisionismo nominal de todos los personajes que hay en el artículo e imponer tu voluntad". No, no es revisionismo nominal, es no inventarse personajes. Es decir, poner el nombre correspondiente a cada individuo.

Me gustaría además pedirte que no mintieses. Por lo menos no de una manera tan obvia. Afirmas que he modificado el nombre de todos los personajes en el artículo. Te invito a leerlo de nuevo. Podrás observar que no se han modificado los nombres traducidos al inglés, pues se trata de la página inglesa, como no se han traducido tampoco los nombres castellanos de personajes castellanos, pues como te he expresado, me preocupo en mi edición por el rigor histórico y el respeto a la historia de comunidades humanas sean o no la mía.

Velar por la memoria histórica y el rigor histórico en un artículo sobre historia para una enciclopedia pública con el calado de Wikipedia no es imponer mí voluntad, es conferir seriedad a dicha enciclopedia y mejorar un artículo con errores históricos de grano grueso.

6) Te pediría que, de requerir a los demás fuentes y citas, aplicases las mismas exigencias a tus "correcciones", pues no son solo errores discretos los que estás decidido a mantener, si no de gran calado, y todos ellos sin fuentes que los respalden (adelantamiento de la frontera de Galicia).

7) "esto no es minimizar grupos étnicos ni nada parecido, no estamos nosotros aquí para salvar lenguas o pueblos, sino para contar historia. La historia de la persona está contada, si en su tiempo se llamaba Pedro o Pere, no es relevante para lo que hizo." Creo que esto debería responderse por si mismo. Más allá del trato de desprecio que exhibe esta frase por una comunidad humana que te es ajena, su historia y sus personajes, pareces pretender coronarte con un halo de neutralidad.

Sí importa como se llamaba, Juan no es Pedro, Pedro no es Marco, Pere no es Pedro. Si esto es el respeto que tienes por la historiografía, probablemente no debieras estar editando artículos de historia. Por otra parte, ¿si no te importa como se llamaban, a que tanto emperrarte con que no puedan llevar su nombre en su lengua en un artículo internacional en inglés teniendo que castellanizarlos? Como pedí antes, por favor, evitemos la mentira. Te importa, o no estarías obcecado en castellanizar sus nombres sin fuentes que los respalden (la castellanización de Guevara no es ninguna fuente, es una doble mala praxis que se desmonta en los propios extractos documentales que incorpora a su trabajo. Una doble mala praxis por Guevara y por quien, al cogerlo de fuente, ha escogido la castellanización sobre los nombres presentes en los documentos asociados). Tampoco parecen valerte las formas en portugués moderno propuestas por Sotto Mayor, lo que no deja de ser escoger formas a tu conveniencia (y si realmente solo velas por la fosilización del artículo te recomiendo leer las fuentes citadas en el). Quien y lo que hizo tiene muchas dimensiones de importancia y ninguna merece ser desechada. La identidad de los personajes históricos es una parte muy relevante de su historia. Y merece ser contada.

8) Por rigor histórico y discusión honesta no pasa por aplicar el Efecto Bandwagon, sesgos de status quo o falacias argumentum ad antiquitatem. Y siento usar palabros pero es la única manera de definir lo estás haciendo. Por que algo se haya hecho mal y dañinamente hasta ahora, no es justificación para perpetuar un error.

7) Sintiéndolo mucho, no puedo dejar de leer tu último comentario como una amenaza. Me parece en extremo desagradable, que, después de proponer un debate honesto que inicialmente me pareció, ignoraste, tu respuesta ahora contenga mentiras (pto.5) , falacias (pto.8) y, para más inri, una amenaza.

Sí, soy historiador, y que el artículo usa las fuentes que cita, es definitorio de que alguien en la cadena de creación del artículo, no ha leído las fuentes que menciona. Recientemente has castellanizado los nombres gallego-portugueses en la forma presentada por Sotto Mayor en las páginas de su libro (no me acuerdo ahora del título) citado en el artículo. Todo, absolutamente todo, en la última versión propuesta que has decidido castellanizar nuevamente estaba referenciado siguiendo la propia bibliografía del artículo (¿y me pregunto, por que dices que no esté usando una fuente, lo que sabrías falso de haber leído la bibliografía, pero no lo dices de los nombres castellanizados? ¿A que este doble rasero?).

Me gustaría pese a lo que percibo de deshonesto en tu interacción (pto. 7), dar una oportunidad al sentido común, para que esto deje de ser el artículo con importantes agujeros que es tras tu revisión.

Los arreglos que propongo, que creo que se fundamentan en el respeto y rigor son:

A) Los títulos de Adelantamiento serán correctamente referidos (no como hasta ahora para lo que además no constan de cita bibliográfica). El Adelantamiento de la Frontera podrá contener un hipervínculo a Andalucía por la evidente conexión histórica. Los títulos de adelantamiento de Murcia y la Frontera se escribirán en castellano, el de Galicia, en gallego. El titulo de pertigueiro de la ciudad de Santiago se escribirá en el idioma de la ciudad de Santiago, quien lo ostenta y el del personaje de este artículo (forma normalizada del gallego-portugués). Para estos dos últimos habilitaré una cita a un fondo documental de la USC que está esta semana en mantenimiento (así que tardará) si así te pareciese más razonable.

B) Los títulos de la corte castellana irán en ambos idiomas (en el del monarca y en el de quien lo ostente). Aquí estoy abierto a modificar la propuesta, pero deberíamos dejar claro para el lector internacional que es qué.

C) Los nombres personales se escribirán en una forma normalizada del idioma de los susodichos individuos, a excepción de aquellos en inglés. Así los personajes castellanos tendrán su nombre castellano, y los gallego-portugueses la forma referida en el artículo de Sotto Mayor de la bibliografía (sea cual sea el idioma recogido en el hipervínculo a sus respectivas páginas de Wikipedia - no vamos a perpetrar un error o mala praxis si no a mejorar el artículo).

D) Como comprenderás, no voy a justificar con bibliografía que los individuos galaico-portugueses tenían nombres galaico-portugueses, como no le estás tu pidiendo a nadie que justifique que los individuos castellanos tenían nombres castellanos (no veo ninguna referencia por ningún lado a que el de Haro tuviese un nombre castellano, en cambio si la veo a que dona Joana se llamaba dona Joana en dos fuentes citadas en el artículo). Supongo que entiendes lo ridículo de semejante exigencia y que, en pro de un artículo riguroso, debe usarse la misma vara de medir en todos caso.

PD.: Te pediría que no confundieses "imponer la voluntad" con velar por el rigor de un artículo en consonancia con las fuentes citadas. Y abstengámonos de amenazas, si no te importa. Migdeub (talk) 21:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of ambassadors of Spain to Guatemala, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi TheRichic. Thank you for your work on List of ambassadors of Spain to Lithuania. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the careful work you've done putting together this list from one key source, supplemented by others. Clearly written and with formatting consistent with the page type.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 15:44, 8 February 2026 (UTC)