User talk:The Account 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is The Account 2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Merger
Your nomination of Ding Xuexiang is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Ding Xuexiang is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kisseran -- Kisseran (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ding Xuexiang has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Ding Xuexiang has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kisseran -- Kisseran (talk) 13:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Xi Jinping has failed
Your good article nomination of the article Xi Jinping has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ElijahPepe -- ElijahPepe (talk) 23:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| hard-working barnstar | |
| Thanks for your contributions in the Portal of China. GrandCeres (talk) 03:30, 28 July 2026 (UTC) |
- Thank you! The Account 2 (talk) 10:35, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Intelligence Bureau (Japan), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikkei was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Original Barnstar | ||
Barnstar for your well-sourced, in depth additions to China related articles. Badly needed on this site. Much of the articles you've edited have been very misleading before your contributions. Also good article creation on America against America. I read parts of the book frequently as he was very spot on. Justanotherguy54 (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
|
Thanks for the fishies
Hello! I will be taking a break from Wikipedia after repeated conflicts with admins on this site who refuse to protect page/checkuser blatant socks/ban persistent vandals and defend against coordinated shilling on Chinese (and other) pages here. It has certainly proved quite the Sisyphean endeavour, even though I have been merely an infrequent contributor over these past 20+ years. Best of luck to you, @Amigao, and the others against the intensifying storm. It has been a pleasure editing and learning with you all, even if at times there were conflicts between us which were still resolved objectively and professionally. Cheers! Top5a (talk) 13:17, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your efforts and good luck in your new endeavors. The Account 2 (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
I do not know why "New section" is adding this under your Barnstar. Apologies. Interesting, the auto-generated space after double equals apparently causes this error. Fixed? Oh, there was not a trailing pipe and close brace, and "New section" does not check for proper closure prior to appending! Maybe it will be fixed in phabricator at some point... well, not my problem (¬‿¬)! Sorry about the mangling!
Good article nominations RfC
Hi The Account 2,
There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.
By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.
Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)