User talk:Tserton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Closure for RfC in Talk:Uğur Şahin

Just wanted to let you know I requested closure for the RfC. Bogazicili (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Bogazicili, sorry for not responding - I genuinely didn't intend to ghost you, I just had some personal stuff going on and haven't been on Wikipedia for a few months. I'm sorry the precise wording I chose for the RfC wasn't what you would have used. But I think it wouldn't have made much difference. This is a question that's difficult to cleanly answer by appealing to policy or sources. It simply divides Wikipedia editors and will probably continue to do so for a long time.
I'm open to trying again to work out a compromise for the first sentence, though, if you'd like. Tserton (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bogazicili (talk) 04:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Bogazicili (talk) 04:56, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Tserton. Thank you for your work on Gotion. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this helpful page for a large company, based in China. Appropriately sourced and clear.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI