User talk:UNI279
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A note on astronomical object notability
Hi,
I noticed that you've been recently changing astronomical object redirect pages into new articles. However, I've reverted your edits (namely the two asteroid articles you made) because the subjects of the articles you've been creating are not noteworthy enough to warrant standalone articles. I recommend that you take a look at what objects should have articles and what shouldn't at Wikipedia:Notability (astronomical objects). Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 19:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 4511 has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:55, 25 January 2026 (UTC){{reflist|refs=…}} vs <references>…</references>
Hi, you've changed the references wrapper at LHS 1903 from <references>…</references> to {{reflist|refs=…}} – let's not do that, there was a Wikipedia talk:Citing sources discussion where it was decided not do use {{reflist|refs=…}} & a RfC to replace all instances of it due to the compatibility issues with the VisualEditor. Slovborg (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 3264 has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 15:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Agaricus lanipes has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Sophisticatedevening(talk) 01:37, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Sculptor Void has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Agent 007 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2026 (UTC)March 2026
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:59, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Talk
Hey @UNI279, I am seeing you recently creating many articles but i think you should once review your all recently created articles. Abdullah1099 (talk) 04:58, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of PGC 93125 for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PGC 93125 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)