User talk:Unknown FG

@Unknown FG, I notice you are continuing to make edits such as this one that lack a reliable source. I don't know if you are aware of the need for reliable sources when adding information to articles, but I will ask that you cease such edits unless you can provide reliable sources within those edits. Thank you. 11WB (talk) 01:09, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star [[User talk:Star Mississippi|< {{subst:vw7style="color:#ff33da;">Mississippi]] 02:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Unknown FG I have indefinitely blocked you from mainspace as per the consensus at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#WP:CIR:_@Unknown_FG. Your conduct has been disruptive, but mostly limited to mainspace. Should that change, a broader block can be in play. Please spend the time learning about reliable sources and how to use them should you wish to edit mainspace again in the future. Star Mississippi 02:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

I beseech you to please unblock me. Unknown FG (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

I have learnt my lesson. Unknown FG (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm afraid you're going to have to prove that to us. You are only blocked from mainspace -- articles themselves -- and can still edit at article talk pages. You can make edit requests using Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/Protected. Make good edit requests for a while -- I'd suggest maybe a hundred over a period of at least a month -- then come back here and show us that your edit requests are without exception well-sourced, and neither the request nor the suggested edit are generated using AI. Valereee (talk) 12:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 03:22, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey there. Just a quick note to let you know that I've userfied your unfinished WP:AELECT3 candidate page. You can find it at User:Unknown FG/AELECT3. Feel free to use it to help you plan for a future AELECT, or you can tag it for deletion by adding {{Db-author}} to the top of it. Hope that helps. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:25, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

is declined and user is redirected here to make their unblock request. In the UTRS request, the user indicates they were framed. In order for that to be true, they would have to have not used alternate accounts. The findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unknown FG indicate they have used alternate accounts, so Unknown FG will have to specifically account for that discrepancy, if they make an unblock request here. --Yamla (talk) 12:26, 25 December 2025 (UTC)