User talk:UrusHyby

Welcome!

Hello, UrusHyby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, especially for the efforts to clean up the GPS article. One small note, for future reference: when you make a change to an article, please remember to provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps other users reading the edit history of the page, as well as preventing possible misunderstandings as to the nature of your edits. Thank you again. Ckatz^chat_spy 18:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok, deal. UrusHyby (talk) 06:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Thanks for uploading File:Gps tracking geofence.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, someone should have notified you before but didn't. Please see Wikipedia:Coin#Wialon, it would be useful if you could comment. Thanks Smartse (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

thank you for notifying, i'll give my comments. UrusHyby (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Make sure you understand what you are talking about. The best and most reliable references to the products or technologies are actually the homepage of the product. Most of the links in the GPS software are opensource products, and in fact the source and the pages are peer reviewed. Raysonho (talk) 00:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Whoa. The best sources for our articles are independent sources, not the product page of the manufacturer that's being discussed. Dawnseeker2000 00:48, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I think the NPOV applies to other areas, but a technical site does not have a POV. The independent sources mostly copy the technical spec. from the manufacturers homepage. Show me an independent source's page about a product that is more NPOV & correct than the manufacturer's site. Raysonho (talk) 01:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

We are not talking about a neutral-point-of-view issue here. NPOV is something separate from what I'm referring to. Independent sources are of higher value when added to any area of Wikipedia - technical, social, or whatever. We'd much rather have a secondary source in all circumstances of adding content. It's clear to me, and it seems pretty clear to UrusHyby. I always use secondary sources and I'd like to encourage you to also. Dawnseeker2000 01:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Generally references are needed in case if "Statements of opinion or materials challenged or likely to be challenged". Wikipedia:Verifiability so, there's no need of adding three commercial links to just one obvious sentence in an article GPS tracking unit, where already non-commercial ref. exists. And Dawnseeker2000 is absolutely right about sources policy of Wikipedia.UrusHyby (talk) 10:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

ok, will put more attention to it. UrusHyby (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 09:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

That's probably because i've made two edits on the same page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Old_Belarusian_language&diff=381888176&oldid=381854537

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Old_Belarusian_language&diff=382034461&oldid=381968602

But it's worth noticing that both times i've made reasonable comments on my edits, and those who reverted them said nothing, but "Actually, you're wrong".

Thanks for uploading File:Gps tracking geofence.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 14:25, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gps tracking software.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi UrusHyby. Thank you for your work on Fleet digitalization. Another editor, 11wallisb, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Many of the sources in this article are not reliable, see WP:RGATE. There are also bare URLs which are vulnerable to link rot. Please address these issues. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11wallisb}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, UrusHyby,

Thank you for creating Video telematics.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add categories in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fade258}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fade258 (talk) 12:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. An edit that you recently made to GPS tracking unit seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 16:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello Leonidlednev,

Thank you for your message regarding my recent edits to the GPS tracking unit page and for your diligence in maintaining Wikipedia's quality.

I'd like to be transparent about my editing process. You are correct that I used a large language model to assist with the edits, and in accordance with Wikipedia's guideline on large language models (WP:LLM). My use of the tool was strictly for improving the grammar, wording, and encyclopedic tone of the content, which is a permissible use of AI as an editing tool under WP:AI. I want to assure you that I take full responsibility for the content, as required by that policy.

My main motivation for the rewrite was that the article has had a "more citations needed" tag since January 2019 and contained significantly outdated information. My goal was to directly address these issues by introducing a large number of recent, reliable sources to create a modern, well-structured, and verifiable overview of the technology.

Crucially, all of the substantive information added was derived directly from the reliable, secondary sources provided in the citations, in full adherence with Wikipedia's core policies of Verifiability and No Original Research. I personally gathered and verified each source to ensure it supported the text, and the AI was not used to generate any unsourced facts or create fictitious citations, but to help me as a non-native english speaker.

If there are any specific sentences or claims you still find problematic or believe are not adequately supported by their citation, please let me know. I would be happy to refine them or discuss the sources further. Otherwise I will get revert it back to my version.

Best regards,

UrusHyby (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

WP:AI is not policy, also do not use an LLM to generate comments on talk pages, see WP:AITALK. There is strong evidence that you have used an LLM to generate content outright, one example being your most recent creation at Mikita Melkazioraŭ where all the references are hallucinated.

If your ability to use English is such that you cannot function without relying on an LLM, then the English Wikipedia is not the project for you. Consider editing on your native language's Wikipedia or the Simple English Wikipedia instead.

Regardless, stop copying and pasting LLM content into Wikipedia. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 13:16, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

thank you for your attention, I do believe that i follow the core concept of WP that AI is a proper tool, is it used carefully/. That is exactly what i was doing. Similarly the approach of WP:AICLEAN states "The purpose of this project is not to restrict or ban the use of AI in articles, but to verify that its output is acceptable and constructive, and to fix or remove it otherwise.". All the changes i do are goodwill based and supported by sources that i personally handpick Preferences (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Replied to at the LLMN discussion here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 14:51, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Apologies as I should have mentioned this before, but there does exist a guideline you should be aware of, WP:NEWLLM, which states Large language models should not be used to generate new Wikipedia articles from scratch. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 17:19, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

thanks for highlighting. I totally share your concerns, noone need incorrect statements in wiki. I've already explained my position above. For the topics that I'm well aware, and especially pages with problem tags hanging there for 5+ years usage of bots both saves time and makes wikipedia better. all about good faith WP:AGF Preferences (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

usage of bots both saves time and makes wikipedia better – No, it's just created more work and more subtle issues that are harder to detect and fix, and which other editors will now need to review and clean (more than 100 articles in this case). This is not saving time nor making Wikipedia better.

LLMs are highly unsuited for use on Wikipedia. They are predictive models, and predictions can be wrong. Sometimes these incorrect predictions are obvious as in **this edit**, other times they are more subtle such as with nonexistent journal articles in this edit. Models can introduce biases, either directly during text generation/modification, or indirectly by selectively making suggestions or returning sources. Models frequently violate the Manual of Style. These issues are core to how LLMs function, and can occur regardless of what prompts are used.

If you see a problem tag of 5+ years, but are unable to address it without using an LLM, then please just leave it unaddressed. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi UrusHyby. Thank you for your work on Video telematics. Another editor, 11wallisb, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Many of the sources used in this article are not reliable. Please find some reliable secondary sources that are not company websites advertising products. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|11wallisb}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

11WB (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jay8g. An edit that you recently made to Automatic vehicle location seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jay8g [V•T•E] 14:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bicycle-sharing system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digitalization. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mikola Yermalovich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belarusian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Slutsk uprising#Nuked article. --Altenmann >talk 20:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Reburial of Kastuś Kalinoŭski and January Uprising leaders - Vilnius Cathedral Basilica - 22 November 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard regarding an AI cleanup investigation which may be related to you. Mellk (talk) 11:38, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Mikita Melkazioraŭ. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. – bradv 15:25, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

In the article Mikita Melkazioraŭ I noticed two grave problems wiith your contributions

• overgeneralization ; e.g., you write "The project was cited for its influence within the Belarusian media landscape", but the reference is for a singlle citation. Someone else must write ""was cited for" and only then you can add this claim into wikipedia
• nonchalant treatment of references; you are adding statements not found in the refs cited, e.g., here.

Please review our policies WP:NOR, WP:CITE, WP:RS. --Altenmann >talk 21:00, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fuel level sensor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Lijil (talk) 04:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model, as you did at Mikita Melkazioraŭ. This edit contains apparent LLM-generated text with OR/SYNTH issues. You have been warned about this multiple times, including at WP:AINB § User:UrusHyby NicheSports (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

thank you for youк message. The edit you're referring to is clearly based on quote "But I am glad to see that more and more Belarusians are choosing to discuss interviews of Melkozerov, Chaly or Shraibman — instead of their Russian colleagues." that is available on the article in reference. https://tsikhanouskaya.org/en/news/cf1c661ca99af61.html I do not see what's wrong with the text I had for the article, can you please explain or provide better wording:

Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya also highlighted his influence, noting in 2023 that Belarusians were increasingly discussing interviews by Melkazioraŭ and other local figures instead of their Russian colleagues, marking a shift away from the "Russian cultural and information space. Preferences (talk) 10:55, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Altenmann, same question to you. Don't see why you're reverting this edit. Preferences (talk) 11:58, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Because you (or your AI tool) added conclusions not present in what is written in the source. In Wikipedia it is called "original research", see the policy WP:NOR. --Altenmann >talk 16:50, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm reading it back and forth... You believe the part "marking a shift away from the "Russian cultural and information space" is the one that is not supported in the text by Tsikhanouskaya https://tsikhanouskaya.org/en/news/cf1c661ca99af61.html ? UrusHyby (talk) 15:33, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

By the way, your new signature does not show your user name. This is not good for communication. --Altenmann >talk 16:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)