User talk:V12U253

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, V12U253! Thank you for your contributions. I'm CaptainEek and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. I am always willing to help folks out! You can also check out the friendly Teahouse to ask any questions you might have. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

First of all, thank you for your kindness and warm welcome. And then admire your courage and bravery. Thank you. (V12U253 (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC))

March 2025

You posted the following to Tbhotch's Talk page: "Hello! @Tbhotch. Give me status! And explain about it and its functions!".

What status? What functions? What are you talking about?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I talked about getting a status. I was told by CapitanEek: 30 days and 500 edits. "rollback", extended confirmed users". Thanks. (V12U253 (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

If you know how extended-confirmed works, why are you asking Tbhotch? Why are you so anxious to become extended-confirmed and have rollback? You have a total of 46 edits since you began editing here. Only 5 of them are to article space. What you seem to be doing is WP:GAMING, meaning you are trying to make edits anywhere so you can be extended-confirmed? Generally, that results in it being removed because the edits are not legitimate. Do you have any other accounts at Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

I just want to find out for myself, and I would like to know what the functions of these statuses are. Thanks. (V12U253 (talk) 01:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't have another Wikipedia account, I edit with 1 account. (V12U253 (talk) 01:45, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Mary Harriman reversions

What is with the reversions with no explanation? The word "dollar" was redundant. The deathdates of her children are available. Rontrigger (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, this job is no longer refundable. (V12U253 (talk) 01:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, please stop making edits like this. We are all here to build an encyclopedia :). GoldRomean (talk) 18:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I understand you, I'll stop doing this, let me know if you need help. Thanks. (V12U253 (talk) 18:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. To the contrary, feel free to let me know if you have any questions. GoldRomean (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, thanks to you too, we will develop our encyclopedia to the world together! Thanks for your edits on Wikipedia. Thanks (V12U253 (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

You usally don't need to Wikilink nouns like "encyclopedia" or "tea", BTW :). GoldRomean (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

You mean what I wrote in the teahouse? yes excuse me. (V12U253 (talk) 18:36, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi V12U253! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 10:20, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

April 2025

Your editing and especially your comments continue to be bizarre. Regardless, you should not be commenting/responding to WP:Teahouse threads. You do not have enough experience to patrol the Teahouse. You can ask a legitimate question but don't participate in threads started by other editors.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I'm sorry, please don't block me? (V12U253 (talk) 18:42, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

What should I do to increase my experience and reach it? Thank you. I wish you success in your work! (V12U253 (talk) 18:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I wouldn't even think about that at the moment, or anything else that requires a lot of experience. You should focus on editing articles constructively, which, to date, you've done very little of.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Ok, what should I do, please tell me. (V12U253 (talk) 18:52, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Please edit articles constructively and stay away from the Teahouse until you have actual questions. Your Teahouse comments are very strange and unconstructive. GoldRomean (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I understand! Thanks for the reminder. (V12U253 (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm guilty too, but he wrote them as a joke! (V12U253 (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abduvaitov Sherzod 2 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abduvaitov Sherzod 2. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

V12U253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Your reason here V12U253 (talk) 01:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a valid unblock request. In any case, we don't unblock sock accounts, esp. of long-time troublemakers. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:49, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your thread has been archived

Hello V12U253! The thread you created at the Teahouse, An article about technologies, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles