User talk:Vermont

Hi Ray. I am so happy to have a mentor! I am working on an article in the sandbox. I want to send it to review as soon as possible. However, the images have not been through the process of the "Declaration of consent". Can images be easily added to the article later? What would be the process as soon as the "declaration of consent" is through? Further, at what stage does the internal linking of the article to other wikipedia articles need to be? Kind regards, Michèle --Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 09:46, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics: welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for properly disclosing your COI. By "declaration of consent", are you referring to licensing? On Wikipedia, nearly all images must be freely licensed, typically under CC By-SA 4.0. If you have questions about how to release images under this license, let me know and I'd be happy to help. Re: internal linking, you don't need to worry about that much while you're drafting, that can come after. Best, Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 18:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@VermontThank you for your reply. We are going through the process of declaring that the images are freely licensed, however it is more difficult than we assumed. It is possible for us to add the images later, correct? Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 06:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vermont I apologise for misspelling your name in my first message. I published the article, in case you would like to have a look. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mich%C3%A8le_Uster_at_Advance_Metrics/sandbox/INTEGRA_Biosciences_AG Kind regards, Michèle Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Vermont my draft was declined within minutes, I am not sure what went wrong. The reviewer stated: "This is basically just a corporate brochure, it is (ultimately) the company telling the world about itself." Could you have a look and let me know what you think? I would really appreciate your help. Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Vermont I was wondering if responding in this manner is ok?

Thank you for reviewing this draft.

However, I respectfully disagree that the article as a whole reads like an advertisement. I would ask that you identify specific passages that you consider promotional, as Wikipedia's guidelines ask reviewers to be specific when raising neutrality concerns (see WP:NPOVN). The article:

• Uses no superlatives or marketing language in its own voice
• Attributes all evaluative statements to named sources (e.g., "SRF described INTEGRA Biosciences as an example of...")
• Covers factual milestones — founding, acquisitions, relocations, financials — sourced to independent regional and national media (Bündner Tagblatt, SRF, RTR) and industry publications (GenomeWeb, SelectScience, Analytica World)

I welcome specific line-by-line feedback if there are further neutrality concerns. Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 11:26, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

@Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics: hi, sorry my reply might be delayed a couple days, not feeling great. On a quick look I do roughly agree with the decline – the article relies on primary sources from the firm itself, and I'm not sure if there's sufficient independent coverage to support an article. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 02:12, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Vermont Thank you for your response. I have reworked the draft by adding more secondary references and revising the Products section to focus on functionality rather than specific products, in order to avoid a promotional tone. I retained one product mention that is covered by an independent source, but I am happy to remove it if that is still a concern. Could you please review the draft and let me know whether it would be worth submitting the article again? Thank you for your supprt!

Draft:Integra Biosciences Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 14:48, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

@Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics, hi! It's still almost entirely reliant on non-independent sources, and is quite promotional, reading more like a corporate website than an encyclopedia entry. At present, I don't think it's ready to resubmit. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 01:26, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vermont I did some research on the definition of an independent source on Wikipedia and I must admit I am still a bit confused. Based on my understanding, an independent source refers to an independent editor – which would mean that only 2 out of 21 sources are non-independent. Could you help me clarify this? I really appreciate your support on this. Thank you Michèle Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 13:30, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

@Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics, so, an independent source for our purposes is one whose author/creation/etc. is independent of the topic. This article, for example, is not independent because it is a press release: it was created by the topic. Unless I've misread, the only independent sources on that article are the industry awards (which are often paid/influenced anyways), and thus there is not the kind of significant coverage that can establish notability. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 13:36, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vermont Thank you for clarifying. Michèle Uster at Advance Metrics (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi! its my first time ever logging in after 10 days i never know about editing and i want to edit the 2026 pacific typhoon season! --Nahitsgood1 (talk) 08:54, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

@Nahitsgood1, yay! Check out Help:Introduction, a nice intro to editing Wikipedia. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 13:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

thank you vermont it helped me alot :> Nahitsgood1 (talk) 08:59, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Vermont is a reliable source a link from the article?? Nahitsgood1 (talk) 09:04, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Wiuuuu5847. I would want to know how do I create articles. Do I just write stuff and it'll be on Wikipedia what's the deal here? Is there any stuff for creating articles? --Wiuuuu5847 (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

@Wiuuuu5847: hello! Check out Help:Introduction. What do you want to write about? Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 19:12, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

I've already started a draft about Companyballs. I don't know how to get references. Wiuuuu5847 (talk) 19:16, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

@Wiuuuu5847, hi! For a topic to have an article on Wikipedia, it needs to meet our notability guideline, which this doesn't seem to. I'd recommend starting out by improving existing articles rather than creating new ones; have you checked the tasks on your homepage? Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 02:09, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 21:02, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello how do I create a citation --Bullet256 (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello how can I create a citation --Bullet256 (talk) 04:38, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

@Bullet256, hi! Check out Help:Citing sources. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 21:32, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

What is your name --Muneebulhassan647 (talk) 06:10, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi! Like most Wikipedia editors, I am pseudonymous. You can call me by my username, "Sdkb". Cheers, Sdkb ^talk 11:55, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

how do i make an article Cohen Teel (talk) --Muneebulhassan647 (talk) 06:14, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi! See Help:Your first article. Cheers, Sdkb ^talk 11:56, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

How do I create a citation? --Precious Anastasia (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi! See Help:Referencing for beginners. Cheers, Sdkb ^talk 11:57, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi Rae! Thank you for offering to help.

So far, I have done some basic edits re: tone and adding links, which have been a nice entry point!

I would like to edit articles where I feel I have more expertise - for example, I am a professional data scientist and would feel more confident finding sources for articles about statistics or computing topics. I was curious what you think the best way is for me to find pages in need of attention about more fine grained topics than the very broad filters available on the home page. --SRS-MOONLIGHT (talk) 16:31, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

@SRS-MOONLIGHT, hello! Welcome to Wikipedia :) I'm happy to hear you've liked the tone and link stuff. What area(s) of data science are you most interested in editing about? Maybe I could help find some articles that could use some love. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 02:42, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps Bayesian statistics, or causal inference - both are areas of interest for me and I think I know enough of the basics (Bayesics??) to help improve some articles. Thank you! SRS-MOONLIGHT (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

@SRS-MOONLIGHT, ooh!

Causal inference is my area of most knowledge, particularly in the OLS and OLS-adjacent set of methods (despite the section you see below this one :p), though I've not edited much in the topic area. I've been planning to (read: procrastinating on) rewrite synthetic control method for a little while, and may be up to collaborate on that if it's an area of interest for you. Otherwise, basically every article on causal inference methods could use either rewriting or updating. Instrumental variables is roughly 15-20 years behind on the literature, difference in differences is basically just the 2x2 setup (and does not cover post-Bacon advances in differential treatment timing or other areas), regression discontinuity design is similarly outdated, and afaict regression adjustment/selection on observables doesn't have its own article. There is much to be done, both big and small.

Sadly I would be mostly unhelpful for Bayesian stuff. Regardless of what you end up working on, let me know if you'd like help/feedback. And let me know if snippets/information from any of these books would be helpful :) Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 03:19, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Frisch–Waugh–Lovell theorem has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ShillAwayAsSeenOnTV -- ShillAwayAsSeenOnTV (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2026 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

September 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 September 2026, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin at a particularly important time for NPP. The backlog has now passed 30,000 unreviewed articles, a level that has been described in current NPP discussions as exceptionally high and potentially difficult to overcome through normal reviewing alone. Backlog drives are one of the few measures that have historically produced a noticeable reduction in the backlog, so the participation of as many active patrollers as possible will matter this month. If you can review during September, please make articles your priority. Every article that is reviewed is a meaningful reduction in the backlog. With the queue at its current size, even a relatively small increase in the number of articles each patroller reviews can add up to a substantial difference over the course of the month. This is a hybrid drive, so redirect reviewing is still included. Redirects can be a useful way for newer patrollers to get comfortable with NPP and can help people build up to reviewing articles. However, the main goal of this drive is to tackle the article backlog, and experienced patrollers are particularly encouraged to spend as much of their available reviewing time on articles as they can. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. If you have been thinking about doing more NPP, this is an especially good month to jump in. Whether you can review a few pages or hundreds, every review helps. And if you are already an active patroller, please consider whether you can put in some additional time during September to help bring the backlog back under control. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2026 (UTC)