Wasei-kango
Japanese words formed from Chinese-derived morphemes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wasei-kango (Japanese: 和製漢語; lit. 'Japanese-made Chinese words') are words formed in Japan from Chinese-derived morphemes. In their central sense, they are written in kanji and read with the on'yomi pronunciations of the characters, and are classified within the Japanese Sino-Japanese vocabulary known as kango.[1]: 217–218 The category includes words whose written form was created in Japan and, in broader treatments, Chinese forms that acquired a new structure or specialized meaning in Japanese. Its boundaries therefore vary among scholars.[2]: 94–96
| 和製漢語 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Simplified Chinese | 和制汉语 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Traditional Chinese | 和製漢語 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literal meaning | Japanese-made Chinese words | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vietnamese name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vietnamese alphabet | Hòa chế Hán ngữ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chữ Hán | 和製漢語 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Korean name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hangul | 화제한어 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hanja | 和製漢語 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Japanese name | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kanji | 和製漢語 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hiragana | わせいかんご | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wasei-kango and Japanese loanwords are defined by different relationships. Wasei-kango are identified by their formation and history within Japanese. Only those that were subsequently borrowed into Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, or another language are loanwords in the receiving language. Conversely, Chinese has borrowed Japanese elements that are not wasei-kango, including written forms of native Japanese words, European loanwords transmitted through Japanese, and words transcribed from Japanese pronunciation.[3]: 163–167, 174
Definition and scope
Japanese vocabulary is commonly divided by origin into native Japanese words (wago), Sino-Japanese words (kango), other loanwords (gairaigo), and hybrids. Wasei-kango are normally grouped with kango rather than with wago or gairaigo.[4]
Liwei Chen classifies wasei-kango by both form and meaning. His account distinguishes three types created independently in Japan from two types based on forms already attested in Chinese.[1]: 217–218
| Broad group | Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent formation in Japan | Change from a native to a Sino-Japanese reading | A Japanese expression written in kanji is reanalysed and read with on'yomi | おほね → 大根; ではる → 出張 |
| Distinctive Japanese combination or spelling | Characters are combined or respelled within Japanese | 焼亡, 量見, 選考 | |
| Translation terms from the late Edo and Meiji periods | A new compound is made for a foreign concept | 抽象, 哲学 | |
| Based on a Chinese form | Different internal structure or meaning | The written form is attested in Chinese but is interpreted through a different Japanese compound structure | 激動, 安置, 洋行 |
| Classical form applied to a foreign concept | An older Chinese expression is assigned a modern technical meaning; these are also called "semi-wasei-kango" | 社会, 経済, 文化 |
The breadth of this classification is disputed. Chen treats phonological form, morphology, and meaning together, and discusses some native, mixed-reading, and jukujikun forms within a broader account of Japanese-made Chinese-character vocabulary. Tajima argues that a Sino-Japanese reading is a necessary condition for kango and objects to including clearly established native or mixed readings merely because their written form consists of kanji.[2]: 94–95 There is similar variation in the treatment of semantic change. Some studies include Chinese forms that developed new meanings in Japanese, while Chen excludes gradual semantic change accompanying ordinary borrowing but includes cases in which Japanese compound structure produced a distinct meaning.[2]: 95–96
Identification therefore draws on three kinds of evidence: the form and reading of the compound; comparison of its Chinese and Japanese meanings and internal structure; and dated evidence from dictionaries, translations, and ordinary texts. An early occurrence of the written form establishes an attestation, but does not by itself identify a coiner, the modern meaning, or the direction in which the word later spread.[5]
Meiji era
The Meiji era was an especially productive period for Chinese-character translation terms. Japanese writers formed new compounds and assigned new technical senses to older expressions while translating European works in politics, philosophy, law, and science. Examples include the newly formed tetsugaku (哲学; philosophy) and denwa (電話; telephone), as well as older forms such as shakai (社会; society), keizai (経済; economy), and bunka (文化; culture) that acquired modern conceptual meanings.[1]: 218–220
From the late nineteenth century into the early twentieth, many terms used in modern Japanese entered Chinese through translations and the work of Chinese students in Japan. Because the written form could be retained and read with Chinese pronunciations, the words were readily integrated into written Chinese.[3]: 161–163 Their apparent familiarity can obscure their route of transmission: a word may already have an old Chinese form, a modern meaning standardized in Japan, and a later return to Chinese.
Wasei-kango were not created in a single direction. Chinese works on Western learning, Chinese–English dictionaries, Japanese translations, and Japanese bilingual dictionaries all contributed to the vocabulary. Japanese scholars purchased and consulted nineteenth-century dictionaries produced in China, including Robert Morrison's A Dictionary of the Chinese Language (1822), An English and Chinese Vocabulary in Court Dialect (1844), and Justus Doolittle's Vocabulary and Handbook of the Chinese Language (1872).[6] Miyata re-examined 91 modern words previously classified as wholly Japanese in origin and concluded that 49 originated in Chinese sources, while seven remained unresolved.[6]: 167–188 Modern etymological research consequently studies each word's attestations, meanings, translations, circulation, and establishment rather than assigning the entire vocabulary to one national source.[5]
History
Pre-Meiji period
Since antiquity, the Japanese have supplemented their native vocabulary, known as yamato kotoba, by borrowing many words from Chinese. After integrating Chinese words into their vocabulary, Japanese speakers also created local kango.
One source of wasei-kango was the reinterpretation of a native expression through the on'yomi readings of its written characters. The word for daikon, 大根, changed from the native reading おおね (ōne) to だいこん (daikon). The meaning expressed by 腹が立つ (hara ga tatsu, "to become angry") was condensed into the Sino-Japanese compound 立腹 (rippuku, "anger"). Terms were also formed for Japanese institutions, occupations, and cultural practices, including 芸者 (geisha) and 介錯 (kaishaku).[7]
Meiji Restoration
As Western influence intensified during the nineteenth-century Meiji Restoration, Japanese scholars required terminology for books and disciplines imported from Europe. They created some expressions within Japanese, redefined classical Chinese forms, and adopted terms recorded in Chinese works and Chinese–Western dictionaries. These processes operated together rather than as separate national vocabularies.[1]: 218–220 [6]
Some existing words were repurposed. 世界, for example, was a Classical Chinese Buddhist expression before becoming the ordinary modern word for "world". Other forms were new Japanese creations, including tetsugaku (哲学; philosophy) and denwa (電話; telephone). The Meiji period greatly expanded this translated vocabulary, but a word's presence in Meiji Japanese does not alone demonstrate that it was coined in Japan.[5]
Following the Meiji Restoration, Japanese printed works and bilingual dictionaries helped standardize and circulate these terms. From the late nineteenth century, many forms used in Japanese spread into modern Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese, generally retaining their characters or character-based morphemes while receiving local Sino-Xenic pronunciations.[8]: 580–581
Transmission to Chinese
Chinese borrowings from Japanese include newly created compounds and established Chinese forms that returned with a modern meaning. They also include Japanese items outside the category of wasei-kango. Taiwan Mandarin, for example, borrowed the written form and meaning of the native Japanese word 物語 (monogatari), European loanwords represented in Japanese with characters, and phonetic forms such as ōbāsan and ichiban.[3]: 163–167, 174 The history of a Japanese loanword in Chinese is therefore a question of transmission, while classification as wasei-kango is a question about its formation inside Japanese.
Chinese-language etymological research also uses the concept of an "activated word" for a form that existed earlier in Chinese at low frequency but became common under Japanese influence. This category separates the existence of an older written form from the later increase in use or establishment of a specialized meaning.[9]
Transmission to Korean and Vietnamese
The shared use of Chinese characters in modern East Asia allowed terms used in Japan to be borrowed through their written form. They were generally pronounced with Sino-Korean or Sino-Vietnamese readings rather than Japanese pronunciation. The timing, scale, and route of transmission differed between Korea and Vietnam.[8]: 580–581
In Korean, Japanese-made terms are attested before the formal annexation of Korea. Wonjae Chang examined 3,621 kango in the 1895–1896 Kukmin sohak tokpon school reader and The Independent newspaper. Of these, 2,393 (66.0 percent) had the same written form as words in contemporary Japanese sources. After comparing the use of 2,290 same-form, same-meaning items in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean materials, Chang judged 229 (10.0 percent) likely to have been made in Japan.[10] The figures also show that a shared written form is not sufficient evidence of Japanese origin.
Contact during the Japanese colonial period further expanded the use of modern character vocabulary. Japanese 社会, 警察, and 主義 are read in Korean as 사회 (sahoe), 경찰 (gyeongchal), and 주의 (juui). The native Japanese reading 組合 (くみあい, kumiai) was likewise borrowed through its written form and read 조합 (johap). Such Japanese-source character words are broader than wasei-kango in the narrow sense.[8]: 587–589
Vietnamese already had a large layer of Sino-Vietnamese vocabulary borrowed from earlier Chinese. A new wave of character terms in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries included forms created in Japan or assigned modern meanings there. Examples include tự do (自由, "freedom"), xã hội (社会, "society"), khoa học (科学, "science"), and nguyên tử (原子, "atom"). Although modern Vietnamese normally writes them in the Vietnamese alphabet, their syllables preserve Sino-Vietnamese readings.[8]: 591–593
Some terms passed directly from Japanese, while others reached Vietnamese through Chinese. cộng hòa (共和, "republic"), kinh tế (経済, "economy"), and mỹ thuật (美術, "fine art") have been identified as examples of the Chinese-mediated route. Direct Japanese influence was smaller than in Chinese or Korean because of French colonial language policy, French-language education, and the spread of the Vietnamese alphabet.[8]: 591–593 [11] Meaning could change after borrowing: bác sĩ (博士) means a medical doctor in Vietnamese, while the corresponding form can refer to a doctoral degree in Japanese, Chinese, and Korean.[8]: 593
Examples
The following table preserves commonly compared modern Chinese-character forms across four languages. The entries illustrate how a written form or its morphemes can receive local readings. A matching form does not by itself establish that the word was coined in Japan: individual items may have earlier Chinese attestations, modern meanings established in Japanese, or different routes into Korean and Vietnamese.[8]: 580–581 [10]
| Chinese | Japanese | Korean | Vietnamese | Meaning | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional/ Simplified |
Mandarin (Pinyin) |
Kanji | Rōmaji | Hangul | Revised Romanization | ||
| 中將, 中将 | zhōngjiàng | 中将 | chūjō | 중장 | jungjang | trung tướng | lieutenant general; vice admiral |
| 革命 | gémìng | 革命 | kakumei | 혁명 | hyeogmyeong | cách mạng/mệnh | revolution |
| 民主 | mínzhǔ | 民主 | minshu | 민주 | minju | dân chủ | democracy |
| 共和國, 共和国 | gònghéguó | 共和国 | kyōwakoku | 공화국 | gonghwaguk | cộng hòa[a] | republic |
| 主義, 主义 | zhǔyì | 主義 | shugi | 주의 | juui | chủ nghĩa | ideology; -ism |
| 世界 | shìjiè | 世界 | sekai | 세계 | segye | thế giới | world |
| 國際, 国际 | guójì | 国際 | kokusai | 국제 | gukje | quốc tế | international |
| 出超 | chūchāo | 出超 | shutchō | 출초 | chulcho | xuất siêu | trade surplus |
| 銀行, 银行 | yínháng | 銀行 | ginkō | 은행 | eunhaeng | ngân hàng | bank |
| 電話, 电话 | diànhuà | 電話 | denwa | 전화 | jeonhwa | điện thoại | telephone |
| 廣告, 广告 | guǎnggào | 広告 | kōkoku | 광고 | gwanggo | quảng cáo | advertisement |
| N/A[b] | N/a | 病院 | byōin | 병원 | byeongwon | bệnh viện | hospital |
| 哲學, 哲学 | zhéxué | 哲学 | tetsugaku | 철학 | cheolhak | triết học | philosophy |
| 物理 | wùlǐ | 物理 | butsuri | 물리 | mulli | vật lí | physics |
| 工業, 工业 | gōngyè | 工業 | kōgyō | 공업 | gongeop | công nghiệp | industry |
See also
- Classical compounds in English and other Indo-European languages
- Sino-Xenic vocabulary
- Wasei-eigo